mDOT for Immunosuppressant Adherence in Adolescent Liver Transplant Recipients

Liver Transplantation Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Pilot Study of Mobile Directly Observed Therapy (mDOT) for Immunosuppressant Adherence in Adolescent Liver Transplant Recipients

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03781830
• Other study ID #: IRB00177456
• Status: Withdrawn
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: June 18, 2020
• Est. completion date: November 12, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: August 2021
• Source: Johns Hopkins University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The investigators are interested in whether or not the use of a mobile health (mHealth) application increases the rate of immunosuppression medication adherence among adolescent liver transplant recipients. The investigators aim to test this by recruiting adolescent (ages 14-21) liver transplant recipients to use an mHealth application to record themselves taking their immunosuppression medications, and tracking medication adherence over time. The study population will be approximately 25 adolescent liver transplant recipients at the Johns Hopkins Hospital.

Description:

Non-adherence to immunosuppressive medications among organ transplant recipients is associated with a range of short- and long-term complications, and non-adherence is almost 4 times higher in pediatric and adolescent patients compared to adult transplant recipients. Previous studies have reported rates of non-adherence in this population ranging from 50-70%. Medication non-adherence in adolescents is associated with increased disease frustration, poor regimen adaptation/cognitive issues, difficulty with ingestion (e.g., number of medications, taste), and lack of parental monitoring and involvement. Among pediatric transplant recipients, psychosocial variables (e.g., psychiatric co-morbidities; child responsibility for medication) are strong determinants of nonadherence. Medication adherence is a key concern in the transition from pediatric to adult-centered transplant care, and transition planning should be prioritized in these transplant patients. Therefore, the investigators believe that the use of mobile health (mHealth) technology has the potential to allow clinicians and researchers to better understand nonadherence in pediatric transplant recipients, and increase immunosuppressive medication adherence.

The investigators will use a mobile health platform that enables users to track dose-by-dose medication adherence through asynchronous, video directly observed therapy (DOT). This helps patients take their medication as prescribed and gives providers the assurance that their patients are supported and successful in treatment. DOT is the practice of watching a patient take every dose of medicine in-person, and has typically only been done in extreme cases because it can be both costly and burdensome: DOT is the standard of care for Tuberculosis treatment and has proven high-adherence rates. Through mHealth technology, DOT can be used more broadly and without added burden; emocha's technology allows this through enabling patients to use their mobile application to view their regimen, record themselves taking every dose of their medication, report side effects or symptoms, visualize their treatment progress, and access educational content. This information is encrypted and transmitted to a HIPAA-secure web portal for providers to review. The aim of this study is to understand medication adherence in adolescent liver transplant recipients using the mHealth application.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Withdrawn
• Enrollment: 0
• Est. completion date: November 12, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: November 12, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 14 Years to 21 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Adolescents (14-21 years old)

• Have received a liver transplant at the Johns Hopkins Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

• Non-English speaking

• International

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Liver Transplantation
• Medication Adherence

Intervention

Other:
• mHealth Intervention
The video DOT app will allow transplant recipients to see their medication regimen, record themselves taking every dose, report side effects or symptoms, visualize their treatment progress, access educational content, and track appointments. This information is encrypted and transmitted to a HIPAA-secure web portal for providers to review.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Johns Hopkins Hospital	Baltimore	Maryland

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Johns Hopkins University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (20)

Annunziato RA, Emre S, Shneider B, Barton C, Dugan CA, Shemesh E. Adherence and medical outcomes in pediatric liver transplant recipients who transition to adult services. Pediatr Transplant. 2007 Sep;11(6):608-14. — View Citation

Berquist RK, Berquist WE, Esquivel CO, Cox KL, Wayman KI, Litt IF. Adolescent non-adherence: prevalence and consequences in liver transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant. 2006 May;10(3):304-10. — View Citation

Burra P, Germani G, Gnoato F, Lazzaro S, Russo FP, Cillo U, Senzolo M. Adherence in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl. 2011 Jul;17(7):760-70. doi: 10.1002/lt.22294. Review. — View Citation

Butler JA, Roderick P, Mullee M, Mason JC, Peveler RC. Frequency and impact of nonadherence to immunosuppressants after renal transplantation: a systematic review. Transplantation. 2004 Mar 15;77(5):769-76. — View Citation

Chisholm MA, Lance CE, Williamson GM, Mulloy LL. Development and validation of the immunosuppressant therapy adherence instrument (ITAS). Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Oct;59(1):13-20. — View Citation

De Geest S, Borgermans L, Gemoets H, Abraham I, Vlaminck H, Evers G, Vanrenterghem Y. Incidence, determinants, and consequences of subclinical noncompliance with immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1995 Feb 15;59(3):340-7. — View Citation

Dobbels F, Ruppar T, De Geest S, Decorte A, Van Damme-Lombaerts R, Fine RN. Adherence to the immunosuppressive regimen in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review. Pediatr Transplant. 2010 Aug;14(5):603-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01299.x. Epub 2010 Feb 28. Review. — View Citation

Dobbels F, Van Damme-Lombaert R, Vanhaecke J, De Geest S. Growing pains: non-adherence with the immunosuppressive regimen in adolescent transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant. 2005 Jun;9(3):381-90. Review. — View Citation

Douglas S, Blixen C, Bartucci MR. Relationship between pretransplant noncompliance and posttransplant outcomes in renal transplant recipients. J Transpl Coord. 1996 Jun;6(2):53-8. Review. — View Citation

Foster BJ, Dahhou M, Zhang X, Platt RW, Samuel SM, Hanley JA. Association between age and graft failure rates in young kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2011 Dec 15;92(11):1237-43. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31823411d7. — View Citation

Fredericks EM, Dore-Stites D, Well A, Magee JC, Freed GL, Shieck V, James Lopez M. Assessment of transition readiness skills and adherence in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant. 2010 Dec;14(8):944-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01349.x. — View Citation

Fredericks EM, Lopez MJ, Magee JC, Shieck V, Opipari-Arrigan L. Psychological functioning, nonadherence and health outcomes after pediatric liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2007 Aug;7(8):1974-83. — View Citation

Kahana SY, Frazier TW, Drotar D. Preliminary quantitative investigation of predictors of treatment non-adherence in pediatric transplantation: a brief report. Pediatr Transplant. 2008 Sep;12(6):656-60. — View Citation

Mehta P, Steinberg EA, Kelly SL, Buchanan C, Rawlinson AR. Medication adherence among adolescent solid-organ transplant recipients: A survey of healthcare providers. Pediatr Transplant. 2017 Nov;21(7). doi: 10.1111/petr.13018. Epub 2017 Jul 2. — View Citation

Nahid P, Dorman SE, Alipanah N, Barry PM, Brozek JL, Cattamanchi A, Chaisson LH, Chaisson RE, Daley CL, Grzemska M, Higashi JM, Ho CS, Hopewell PC, Keshavjee SA, Lienhardt C, Menzies R, Merrifield C, Narita M, O'Brien R, Peloquin CA, Raftery A, Saukkonen J, Schaaf HS, Sotgiu G, Starke JR, Migliori GB, Vernon A. Official American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines: Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 1;63(7):e147-e195. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw376. Epub 2016 Aug 10. — View Citation

Pai AL, McGrady M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions to promote treatment adherence in children, adolescents, and young adults with chronic illness. J Pediatr Psychol. 2014 Sep;39(8):918-31. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu038. Epub 2014 Jun 20. Review. — View Citation

Shaw RJ, Palmer L, Blasey C, Sarwal M. A typology of non-adherence in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant. 2003 Dec;7(6):489-93. — View Citation

Simons LE, Blount RL. Identifying barriers to medication adherence in adolescent transplant recipients. J Pediatr Psychol. 2007 Aug;32(7):831-44. Epub 2007 May 23. — View Citation

Simons LE, McCormick ML, Devine K, Blount RL. Medication barriers predict adolescent transplant recipients' adherence and clinical outcomes at 18-month follow-up. J Pediatr Psychol. 2010 Oct;35(9):1038-48. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsq025. Epub 2010 Apr 20. — View Citation

Watson AR. Non-compliance and transfer from paediatric to adult transplant unit. Pediatr Nephrol. 2000 Jun;14(6):469-72. — View Citation

* Note: There are 20 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	12-week immunosuppression adherence	After 12 weeks in the study, patients will complete the 4-item immunosuppressant therapy adherence instrument (ITAS) to determine self-reported medication adherence (scores range from 0-12 with 0 indicating very poor adherence and 12 indicating perfect adherence). Additionally, immunosuppression level trends will be tracked via electronic medical record review to determine medication adherence.	12 weeks
Secondary	Feasibility of using the mHealth Application as Assessed by a Semi-Structured Interview and a 17-Item Survey	After 12 weeks in the study, participants will be asked to participate in a semi-structured phone interview in which they will answer questions regarding their medication adherence habits and their thoughts on how our mHealth technology was or was not helpful. They will also complete a 17-question post-satisfaction survey assessing their satisfaction levels with the mhealth technology. Responses in the 17-item survey are on a 7-item Likert scale, ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree.	12 weeks