Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04641923
Other study ID # LIVER-SEPRAFILM
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date November 2022
Est. completion date June 2025

Study information

Verified date April 2021
Source University of Calgary
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

There has been an increase in the need for repeat hepatic surgery, especially for patients with colorectal liver metastasis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Adhesions at the time of repeat surgery can lead to increased operative times, higher blood loss and even increased perioperative morbidity. Not much data exists regarding use of anti-adhesion barriers at the time of index hepatectomy and their effect on adhesions at repeat hepatectomy. This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of a hyaluronan and cellulose based antiadhesive topical film at index hepatectomy in reducing perihepatic adhesions at the time of repeat hepatic surgery.


Description:

Peritoneal adhesions develop in up to 93% of patients following abdominal surgery.1 Mesothelial injury, inflammation and unbalanced fibrinolysis have been described as the primary factors leading to adhesion formation.2 Within hepatic surgery, the degree to which adhesions pose a significant challenge at the time of repeat resection often depends upon the extent of hepatectomy, hilar dissection, number of preceding liver resections, and the location of the proposed repeat partial hepatectomy. More specifically, peri-hepatic adhesions can lead to increased operative time, an increased risk of bleeding, injury to adjacent intra-abdominal organs and even higher perioperative morbidity.3 Similar to other diseases, repeat hepatectomy is often required in instances of both primary and metastatic liver cancers. This need will likely only increase in the future with continuously improving systemic chemotherapy and novel multimodality treatments. Not surprisingly, the necessary lysis of peri-hepatic adhesions has also been shown to increase operative times, by consuming as much as 50% of the operative procedure, during a repeat hepatectomy as well.4 Numerous anti-adhesion materials and barriers have been studied in colorectal,5,6,7 gynecological,8,9 neurosurgery,10 cardiac surgery,11 and otolaryngology.12 There is some data that these barriers can also be helpful in reducing operative times for repeat hepatectomy as well.13 More specifically, in a rat model, an Alg bilayer sponge application was effective in preventing peri-hepatic adhesions following a crush hepatectomy model.14 Unfortunately, there has been limited data regarding the effectiveness of any antiadhesion barriers in reducing peri-hepatic adhesions to date. SEPRA-C2T15 concluded that barrier film is helpful in reducing abdominal and perihepatic adhesions. This was done in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastasis who underwent two stage hepatectomy and the median time to second hepatectomy was only 2 months. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a topical anti-adhesion barrier film in reducing the severity of subsequent peri-hepatic adhesions at the time of repeat hepatic surgery.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 40
Est. completion date June 2025
Est. primary completion date December 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients undergoing partial hepatectomy with high likelihood of needing repeat hepatectomy (e.g. those with colorectal liver metastasis and hepatocellular carcinoma) 2. Patients = 18 years of age. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients unable to provide informed consent. 2. Patients with hypersensitivity to Seprafilm and/or to any components of the Seprafilm. 3. Patients who are found to have unresectable disease during surgery (additional hepatic lesions or extrahepatic metastatic disease precluding liver resection

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Adhesion barrier
Adhesion barrier application at the time of first surgery

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Foothills Medical Centre Calgary Alberta

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Calgary

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (15)

Ahmad G, O'Flynn H, Hindocha A, Watson A. Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 30;(4):CD000475. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000475.pub3. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 M — View Citation

Arung W, Meurisse M, Detry O. Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov 7;17(41):4545-53. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i41.4545. Review. — View Citation

Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, Beck DE, Stryker SJ, Wexner SD, Wolff BG, Roberts PL, Smith LE, Sweeney SA, Moore M. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-bl — View Citation

Caylan R, Bektas D. Preservation of the mastoid aeration and prevention of mastoid dimpling in chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma surgery using hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Apr;264(4):377-80. E — View Citation

Dupré A, Lefranc A, Buc E, Delpero JR, Quenet F, Passot G, Evrard S, Rivoire M. Use of bioresorbable membranes to reduce abdominal and perihepatic adhesions in 2-stage hepatectomy of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: results of a prospective, rando — View Citation

Fazio VW, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, van Goor H, Bauer JJ, Wolff BG, Corman M, Beart RW Jr, Wexner SD, Becker JM, Monson JR, Kaufman HS, Beck DE, Bailey HR, Ludwig KA, Stamos MJ, Darzi A, Bleday R, Dorazio R, Madoff RD, Smith LE, Gearhart S, Lillemoe K, Göhl J — View Citation

Kaneko Y, Hirata Y, Achiwa I, Morishita H, Soto H, Kobayahsi J. Adhesion barrier reduces postoperative adhesions after cardiac surgery. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2012 Jun;20(3):257-62. doi: 10.1177/0218492311435154. — View Citation

Kobayashi Y, Shindoh J, Igata Y, Okubo S, Hashimoto M. A novel scoring system for evaluating the difficulty of lysis of adhesion and surgical risk at repeat hepatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Apr;27(4):191-199. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.708. Epub 202 — View Citation

Kumar S, Wong PF, Leaper DJ. Intra-peritoneal prophylactic agents for preventing adhesions and adhesive intestinal obstruction after non-gynaecological abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD005080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005080 — View Citation

Mumert ML, Altay T, Couldwell WT. Technique for decompressive craniectomy using Seprafilm as a dural substitute and anti-adhesion barrier. J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Mar;19(3):455-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.09.004. Epub 2012 Jan 14. — View Citation

Ohta S, Toda T, Inagaki F, Omichi K, Shimizu A, Kokudo N, Hasegawa K, Ito T. The Prevention of Hepatectomy-Induced Adhesions by Bilayer Sponge Composed of Ultrapure Alginate. J Surg Res. 2019 Oct;242:286-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.063. Epub 2019 May — View Citation

Schnüriger B, Barmparas G, Branco BC, Lustenberger T, Inaba K, Demetriades D. Prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions: a review of the literature. Am J Surg. 2011 Jan;201(1):111-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.02.008. Review. — View Citation

Shimizu A, Hasegawa K, Masuda K, Omichi K, Miyata A, Kokudo N. Efficacy of Hyaluronic Acid/Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Based Bioresorbable Membranes in Reducing Perihepatic Adhesion Formation: A Prospective Cohort Study. Dig Surg. 2018;35(2):95-103. doi: 10.1 — View Citation

Ten Broek RPG, Stommel MWJ, Strik C, van Laarhoven CJHM, Keus F, van Goor H. Benefits and harms of adhesion barriers for abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014 Jan 4;383(9911):48-59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61687-6. Epub — View Citation

Weibel MA, Majno G. Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery. A postmortem study. Am J Surg. 1973 Sep;126(3):345-53. — View Citation

* Note: There are 15 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Incidence of peri-hepatic adhesions at the time of repeat liver surgery Evaluation will be performed at second surgery as follows:
Calgary Scoring System Grade1-No adhesions, Grade2-Mild, Grade3-Moderate, Grade4-Severe adhesions, Grade5-severe adhesions with injury to other organs
TORanomon Adhesion score (TORAD score):
Hepatic Hilum
1-Easy: Easy for encircling the hepatoduodenal ligament (HDL)
2-Hard: Additional maneuver for encircling HDL
3-Extreme: Safe encircling of HDL is impossible
Liver Surface
1-Easy: No adhesion
2-Hard: Presence of dense fibrosis or scarring tissue- hard dissection
3-Extreme): Dense scar with unclear boundary with the surrounding organs.
0-4 years from initial surgery, time of repeat surgery will vary from patient to patient
Secondary Operating time Operating time will be measured in minutes. Hypothesis is that increased adhesions will increase the operating time. 0-4 years from initial surgery, unpredictable - time of repeat surgery will vary from patient to patient
Secondary Estimated blood loss Estimated blood loss will be measured in milliliters. Increased adhesions lead to increase estimated blood loss. 0-4 years from initial surgery, unpredictable - time of repeat surgery will vary from patient to patient
Secondary Transfusion of blood or blood products Will be measured in # of units, increased adhesions lead to increased blood loss and therefore increased need for blood/blood product transfusion 0-4 years from initial surgery, unpredictable - time of repeat surgery will vary from patient to patient
Secondary Duration of hepatic pedicle clamping Will be measured in minutes. Increased adhesions and blood loss may prompt clamping of hepatic pedicle to decrease blood flow to the liver to decrease active blood loss. 0-4 years from initial surgery, unpredictable - time of repeat surgery will vary from patient to patient
Secondary Postoperative length of stay Will be measured in days, increased adhesions may mean longer surgery and longer recovery time which will increase length of stay in the hospital for the patients 0-4 years from initial surgery, unpredictable - time of repeat surgery will vary from patient to patient
Secondary 30-day mortality and morbidity 30-day postoperative morbidity will be classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (I-V). I being any deviation from normal postoperative course to V being death of patient. Postoperative morbidity will include liver failure (defined according to the International Study Group of Liver Surgery criteria), ascites, intra-abdominal fluid collection, bile leak, hemorrhage, pleural effusion, pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis. Medical complications including acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident/transient ischemic attack, acute kidney injury will also be recorded. Infectious complications will include pneumonia, urinary tract infection, bloodstream infection, and surgical site infection. 30 days after the repeat surgery which may be anywhere from 0-4 months after initial surgery
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT03651154 - Hypovolemic Phlebotomy to Reduce Blood Transfusions in Major Hepatic Resections N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03592550 - The eValuation of Image Guidance of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Ultrasound: Assessment in Liver
Not yet recruiting NCT02521129 - A New Track Ablation Device for Liver Biopsy: A Feasibility Study Phase 1/Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT02168608 - Remote Ischemia Precondition (RIPC) for Hepatic Protection in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT01465425 - Extracolonic Findings on Computed Tomography (CT) Colonography
Active, not recruiting NCT01177007 - Intra-arterial Y-90 TheraSpheres for Hepatic Metastases From Solid Tumors Phase 2
Completed NCT00788697 - SonoVue®-Enhanced Ultrasound Versus Unenhanced US for Focal Liver Lesion Characterization Phase 3
Recruiting NCT01564810 - Cetuximab in Combination With Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Phase 4
Completed NCT00094003 - Study of NS-9 in Patients With Liver Metastases Phase 1
Terminated NCT00051532 - Seocalcitol Versus Placebo in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma N/A
Completed NCT00001587 - A Phase I Study of Isolated Hepatic Portal and Arterial Perfusion (IHP) With Escalating Dose Melphalan for Primary or Metastatic Unresectable Cancers of the Liver Phase 1
Completed NCT00222664 - Qidong Hepatitis B Intervention Study Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04518852 - TACE, Sorafenib and PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody in the Treatment of HCC Phase 2
Completed NCT03289273 - Observational Study to Evaluate, Under Real-world Practice Conditions, the Safety and Effectiveness of Regorafenib in Patients Diagnosed With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (uHCC)
Terminated NCT03349255 - Clinical Study of ET1402L1-CAR T Cells in AFP Expressing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05068180 - Low-dose Neuroleptanalgesia for Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Phase 4
Recruiting NCT03715517 - Spinal Anesthesia For Enhanced Recovery After Liver Surgery N/A
Terminated NCT03685591 - PF-06952229 Treatment in Adult Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1
Terminated NCT01744054 - Microsphere Localization Using PET/MRI or PET/CT in Patients Following Radioembolization Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT02969096 - Clinical Study of Targeted Cryoablation Therapy in the Treatment of Hepatic Carcinoma Phase 2