Clinical Trials Logo

Limb Length Discrepancy clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Limb Length Discrepancy.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06173557 Completed - Clinical trials for Limb Length Discrepancy

Intraoperative Measurement Technique

THR
Start date: March 23, 2015
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

This retrospective cohort study included 50 consecutive patients who underwent THR. All surgeries were performed by the same orthopedic surgeon, using posterior approach. In all patients, the same technique of intraoperative measurement of the femoral offset and limb length was used, entailed calculation of the distances between reference points on the ischium, greater trochanter, and the screwdriver. Measurements were collected from radiographic imaging data and surgical reports.

NCT ID: NCT01738113 Completed - Bone Deformity Clinical Trials

Open Versus Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises in Tibial Distraction Osteogenesis by Ilizarov's METHOD

Start date: July 2014
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The Ilizarov external fixator is an external skeletal fixator that is used to stabilize or lengthen the limb bones. Bone lengthen bone occurs through mechanical distraction on the long axis of the bone, thus the method of lengthening is called distraction osteogenesis. This method has been shown successful. Unfortunately, it has also been associated with a substantial number of complications. Muscle shortening and persistent weakness are among the most common complications seen in this procedure. Muscle shortening usually occurs in strong muscle groups such as the planter flexor muscles, as a result of strength imbalance between the opposing muscle groups. Shortening may persist for more than a year after the removal of the fixator and may require surgical intervention. Fortunately, muscular shortening can be prevented by splinting and physiotherapy in the form of stretching and strengthening exercise and functional training. The use of different exercises in rehabilitation can help accomplishing different therapeutic goals. Thus, the choice to use one or the other should depend on the desired treatment goals. Weight bearing (CKC) and non weight bearing (OKC) exercise has been incorporated into rehabilitation; however, the effects of these two types of exercises particularly on muscle flexibility and mechanics have never been studied systematically. Therefore, the purpose of this is to compare the effects of OKC and the CKC exercise on muscle strength, architecture and flexibility. General Hypothesis: The use of open kinetic or closed kinetic chain exercises will have no different effects on muscle function or internal organization during tibial distraction osteogenesis by Ilizarov's method Specific hypotheses 1. There will be no difference between the effects of OKC and CKC on muscle flexibility. 2. There will be no difference between the effect of OKC and CKC exercises on muscle strength. 3. There will be no difference between the effect of OKC and CKC on the internal organization of muscle specifically the pennation angle, muscle thickness and fiber length. 4. There will be no difference between the overall of OKC and CKC exercise on the functional performance of patients.