Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06309342
Other study ID # VGRFOU-278257
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date August 2024
Est. completion date December 2026

Study information

Verified date May 2024
Source Göteborg University
Contact Lena Bornhöft, PhD
Phone +46761408320
Email lena.bornhoft@vgregion.se
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this randomised controlled trial is to examine the effects of functional examinations and feedback/support on healthy 40-year-olds. The main questions it aims to answer are: • Does feedback and motivational interviewing after testing physical function motivate inactive middle-aged people to increase their physical activity level? • Does the intervention lead to health benefits over time - less pain, better function, higher health-related quality of life, fewer risk factors for lifestyle-related illness? Participants will: • undergo medical and functional health examinations, • their physical activity level will be measured, • receive feedback and advice based on both parts of the examinations, • receive a functional profile, • be supported in goalsetting for lifestyle changes. Researchers will compare with a control group who, after the examinations, receive feedback only from the medical examination to see if participants become more physically active, achieve better function, become more motivated to make lifestyle changes, reduce risk factors for lifestyle-related illness, achieve health benefits and better health-related quality of life.


Description:

Relatively healthy 40-year-olds will be examined at baseline and 1 year with both standard medical and newly developed functional examinations and physical activity level will be measured with accelerometers. The intervention group will receive feedback on all their results. A functional profile will be compiled and explained to each participant and they will receive support in setting relevant goals for lifestyle changes and making realistic plans to achieve them. The control group will also be examined as above but will receive feedback and advice based only on the standard medical examination.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 250
Est. completion date December 2026
Est. primary completion date December 2026
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 39 Years to 40 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - 40 years of age - Relatively normal general mobility - can walk without support and have no self-reported difficulties with using all four extremities - in order to be able to perform standardised functional performance tests. - Self-assessed as physically inactive (level 1 or 2 on the Saltin Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale) as inactive people stand to gain most from this intervention. Exclusion Criteria: - Verbally self-reported physical activity at level three or four on Saltin Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale. - Severe mental illness or intellectual impairment, as participants will be expected to fill out questionnaires and should have the ability to follow healthcare advice independently should they choose to do so. - Pregnancy and/or on-going treatment requiring hospital-based services, to increase probability of baseline values which reflect usual capacity. - No language restrictions are planned but participants needing interpreter help should arrange this themselves.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
PREVFUNKTION
Functional profile and advice concerning cardiovascular fitness level, strength, mobility, balance and posture. Motivational interview and support in goalsetting to make lifestyle changes.
Control
Physical activity measured with accelerometers. Functional examination. Medical examination and advice concerning weight measures, blood pressure and standard blood tests.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Lena Bornhoft Göteborg University, Vastra Gotaland Region

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change in objectively measured physical activity Mean daily minutes in moderate-to-very vigorous physical activity measured with accelerometers for 1 week Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Primary Change in objectively measured sedentary behaviour Mean daily minutes of sedentary behaviour measured with accelerometers for 1 week Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in cardiovascular fitness Fitness level measured in ml/kg/min using the Ekblom Bak submaximal ergometer test Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in motivation level Motivation to make lifestyle changes to improve health on an 11-point numerical rating scale. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Proportion achieved goals Proportion of goals achieved of the goals set by the intervention group at baseline Measured only at 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in fitness level Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for fitness where points are given for grade of deviation from norm. Minimum -2, maximum +2. Higher scores indicate better fitness level. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in strength upper extremity Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for strength upper extremity where points are given for grade of deviation from norm. Minimum -2, maximum +2. Higher scores indicate better strength. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in strength lower extremity Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for strength lower extremity where points are given for grade of deviation from norm. Minimum -2, maximum +2. Higher scores indicate better strength. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in strength trunk muscles Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for strength trunk where points are given for grade of deviation from norm. Minimum -2, maximum +2. Higher scores indicate better strength. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in balance Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for balance where points are given for grade of deviation from norm. Minimum -2, maximum +2. Higher scores indicate better balance. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in mobility Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for mobility where points are given for grade of deviation from norm. Minimum -2, maximum 0. Lower score indicates mobility dysfunction, 0 indicates normal mobility. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in posture Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for posture where points are given for grade of deviation from norm. Minimum -1, maximum 0. Lower score indicates postural deviations, 0 indicates normal postural measurements. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in weight measures Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for weight where points are given for grade of deviation from recommended values. Minimum -2, maximum 0. Lower score indicates overweight (or underweight), 0 indicates normal weight. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in pain Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for pain where points are given for number of pain locations, score on the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire and on the pain question on Euroqol-5 dimensions-3 levels. Minimum -2, maximum 0. Lower score indicates more pain, 0 indicates no pain. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in physical activity Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for physical activity where points are given for grade of deviation from recommended values when objectively measured with accelerometers. Minimum -2, maximum +2. Increased point value indicates higher physical activity level. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in handgrip strength Measured with Jamar handdynamometer (kg) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in biceps strength Measured with 30-second biceps test (number repetitions) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in leg strength Measured with 30-second chair-stand test (number repetitions) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in calf strength Measured with single-foot heel rises (number repetitions) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in ventral trunk strength Measured with plank test (seconds) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in dorsal trunk strength Measured with back endurance test (seconds) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in lower trunk strength Measured with supine bridge test (seconds) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in static balance - 1 Measured with stand-on-one-leg-eyes-open test (seconds) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in static balance - 2 Measured with stand-on-one-leg-eyes-closed test (seconds) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in static balance - 3 Measured with sharpened Romberg test (seconds) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in dynamic balance Measured with functional reach test (centimeters) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in mobility - 1 Measured with sit-rise test (points) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in mobility - 2 Measured with finger-floor test (centimeters) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in mobility - 3 Measured with lateral flexion test (centimeters) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in hypermobility score Measured with Beighton hypermobility score with point values between 0 and 9 where score over 4 indicate general hypermobility. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in neck mobility Measured with occiput-to-wall test (points) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in foot pronation Measured with navicular drop test (millimeters) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in habitual stance Measured with patella mobility test (points) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in health-related quality of life assessed with EQ5D index Measured with index values for Euroqol-5 dimensions-3 levels. Minimum -0.59, maximum +1. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in health-related quality of life assessed with EQ5D VAS Measured with the 100-point barometer for Euroqol-5 dimensions-3 levels. Minimum 0, maximum 100. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in self-reported physical activity assessed with Swedish questionnaire Measured with Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare questionnaire with 2 questions on physical activity and exercise measured in minutes. Minimum 0, maximum measured value 540. Increasing values indicate higher levels of physical activity. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in self-reported physical activity assessed with Saltin Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale (SGPALS) Measured with SGPALS with point values between 1 and 4 where increasing values indicate higher level of physical activity. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in self-reported sedentary time Measured in hours per day with SED-GIH questionnaire with values between 0 and 24 where increasing sedentary time is considered to have a negative impact on health. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in risk for chronic pain and sickness absence assessed with Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire Measured with Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire with scores between 1 and 100 where increasing values indicate higher risk for chronic pain and sickness absence. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in number of pain locations Measured with a pain diagram Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in proportion smokers Proportion smokers in each group Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in proportion acceptable level blood glucose Proportion with blood glucose levels within recommended limits (4.0-6.0 mmol/L) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in proportion acceptable level serum cholesterol Proportion with cholesterol levels within recommended limits (3.3-6.9 mmol/L) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in proportion acceptable level triglycerides Proportion with triglyceride levels within recommended limits (0,45-2.6) Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in proportion acceptable blood pressure Proportion of participants with blood pressure within recommended limits Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in proportion normal body mass index (BMI) Proportion of participants with BMI within recommended limits Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in proportion acceptable waist circumference Proportion of participants with waist circumference below recommended level Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in stress symptoms assessed with Stress and Crisis Inventory-93 Measured with Stress and Crisis Inventory-93 questionnaire. Minimum 0, maximum 140, with higher values indicating higher stress levels. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in depression and anxiety symptoms assessed with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Measured with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Minimum 0, maximum 42 with 21 as maximum for anxiety and 21 maximum for depression. Increasing values indicate more severe symptoms. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Correlation between self-assessed and objectively measured fitness Correlation between fitness self-assessed on a 5-point Likert scale and point value on the fitness arm on the study-specific functional profile. Minimum -1, maximum +1. Higher values indicate better correlation between the 2 measures. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Correlation between self-assessed and objectively measured fitness - 2 Correlation between fitness self-assessed on a 5-point Likert scale and fitness grade on the Ekblom Bak fitness test (5 point Likert scale). Minimum -1, maximum +1. Higher values indicate better correlation between the 2 measures. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Correlation between self-assessed and objectively measured strength upper extremity Correlation between upper extremity strength self-assessed on a 5-point Likert scale and point value for the strength upper extremity arm on the study-specific functional profile. Minimum -1, maximum +1. Higher values indicate better correlation between the 2 measures. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Correlation between self-assessed and objectively measured strength lower extremity Correlation between lower extremity strength self-assessed on a 5-point Likert scale and point value for the strength lower extremity arm on the study-specific functional profile. Minimum -1, maximum +1. Higher values indicate better correlation between the 2 measures. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Correlation between self-assessed and objectively measured balance Correlation between balance self-assessed on a 5-point Likert scale and point value on the balance arm on the study-specific functional profile. Minimum -1, maximum +1. Higher values indicate better correlation between the 2 measures. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Correlation between self-assessed and objectively measured physical activity Correlation between self-assessed walking ability on a 5-point Likert scale and point value on the physical activity arm on the study-specific functional profile. Minimum -1, maximum +1. Higher values indicate better correlation between the 2 measures. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Correlation between self-assessed and objectively measured physical activity - 2 Correlation between self-assessed walking ability on a 5-point Likert scale and number of daily minutes in moderate-to-very vigorous physical activity measured with accelerometers. Minimum -1, maximum +1. Higher values indicate better correlation between the 2 measures. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in relative physical activity Mean daily minutes of moderate-to-very vigorous physical activity measured with accelerometers for 1 week where moderate is individually calculated in relation to fitness level (46% of VO2max). Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
Secondary Change in sufficient physical activity Number of mean daily minutes of physical activity measured with accelerometers for 1 week above a known health-promoting level based on a fitness level of 31.5 ml/kg for women and 35 ml/kg for men. Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02800616 - The Healthy Elementary School of the Future N/A
Completed NCT01323283 - Study of Omega-3 Fatty Acids Regarding Ergogenic, Anti-inflammatory and Obesity Inhibitory Effects in 8 Year Old Children N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03661931 - Dietary Quality Photo Navigation (DQPN) Preliminary Validation Study N/A
Completed NCT03430141 - A Nutritarian Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Lifestyle Changes in Chronic Disease Prevention, Especially Cancer N/A
Completed NCT03553173 - So-Lo-Mo Intervention Applied to the Smoking Cessation Process N/A
Completed NCT02753491 - The Effect of Motivational Short Interview Model in Type 2 Diabetic Patient in Primary Care in TURKEY N/A
Recruiting NCT02999503 - Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Nutrition and Environment N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02428582 - Covered Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents N/A
Completed NCT06158191 - Long-term Benefits of Abdominal Fat Loss in Abdominally Obese Dyslipidemic Patients (SYNERGIE Study) N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03146156 - Lifestyle Intervention in Preparation for Pregnancy (LIPP) N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05770362 - Lifestyle Changes by the COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) Pandemic in Children With Developmental Delays
Recruiting NCT05654337 - Obesity Pathway Intervention Among Overweight and Obese Adults at Primary Care Centers in Hail, Saudi Arabia N/A
Recruiting NCT06425042 - Nicotinamide Riboside Supplementation and Exercise Training to Promote Healthy Longevity N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04827615 - Evaluation of the Ambuja Cement Foundation Noncommunicable Disease Program in Bathinda District of Punjab, India N/A
Completed NCT03115645 - Evaluation of the Dynamic Work Intervention for Office Workers to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour N/A
Completed NCT04683588 - The Effect of Coaching Strategy on Some Patient Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT05999136 - Effects of Pulses Through the Gut Microbiome and Bioavailability of Bioactive Compounds N/A
Completed NCT02832453 - Metabolic Risk Management, Physical Exercise and Lifestyle Counselling in Low-active Adults; Controlled Randomized Trial N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04488289 - The Föllinge Hypertension and Lifestyle Study N/A
Completed NCT04710108 - Testing Message Modality of Culturally Appropriate Nutrition Communication for Mexican American Women N/A