Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
Change in objectively measured physical activity |
Mean daily minutes in moderate-to-very vigorous physical activity measured with accelerometers for 1 week |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Primary |
Change in objectively measured sedentary behaviour |
Mean daily minutes of sedentary behaviour measured with accelerometers for 1 week |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in cardiovascular fitness |
Fitness level measured in ml/kg/min using the Ekblom Bak submaximal ergometer test |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in motivation level |
Motivation to make lifestyle changes to improve health on an 11-point numerical rating scale. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Proportion achieved goals |
Proportion of goals achieved of the goals set by the intervention group at baseline |
Measured only at 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in fitness level |
Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for fitness where points are given for grade of deviation from norm. Minimum -2, maximum +2. Higher scores indicate better fitness level. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in strength upper extremity |
Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for strength upper extremity where points are given for grade of deviation from norm. Minimum -2, maximum +2. Higher scores indicate better strength. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in strength lower extremity |
Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for strength lower extremity where points are given for grade of deviation from norm. Minimum -2, maximum +2. Higher scores indicate better strength. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in strength trunk muscles |
Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for strength trunk where points are given for grade of deviation from norm. Minimum -2, maximum +2. Higher scores indicate better strength. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in balance |
Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for balance where points are given for grade of deviation from norm. Minimum -2, maximum +2. Higher scores indicate better balance. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in mobility |
Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for mobility where points are given for grade of deviation from norm. Minimum -2, maximum 0. Lower score indicates mobility dysfunction, 0 indicates normal mobility. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in posture |
Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for posture where points are given for grade of deviation from norm. Minimum -1, maximum 0. Lower score indicates postural deviations, 0 indicates normal postural measurements. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in weight measures |
Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for weight where points are given for grade of deviation from recommended values. Minimum -2, maximum 0. Lower score indicates overweight (or underweight), 0 indicates normal weight. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in pain |
Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for pain where points are given for number of pain locations, score on the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire and on the pain question on Euroqol-5 dimensions-3 levels. Minimum -2, maximum 0. Lower score indicates more pain, 0 indicates no pain. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in physical activity |
Point level on the study-specific functional profile arm for physical activity where points are given for grade of deviation from recommended values when objectively measured with accelerometers. Minimum -2, maximum +2. Increased point value indicates higher physical activity level. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in handgrip strength |
Measured with Jamar handdynamometer (kg) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in biceps strength |
Measured with 30-second biceps test (number repetitions) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in leg strength |
Measured with 30-second chair-stand test (number repetitions) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in calf strength |
Measured with single-foot heel rises (number repetitions) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in ventral trunk strength |
Measured with plank test (seconds) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in dorsal trunk strength |
Measured with back endurance test (seconds) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in lower trunk strength |
Measured with supine bridge test (seconds) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in static balance - 1 |
Measured with stand-on-one-leg-eyes-open test (seconds) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in static balance - 2 |
Measured with stand-on-one-leg-eyes-closed test (seconds) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in static balance - 3 |
Measured with sharpened Romberg test (seconds) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in dynamic balance |
Measured with functional reach test (centimeters) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in mobility - 1 |
Measured with sit-rise test (points) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in mobility - 2 |
Measured with finger-floor test (centimeters) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in mobility - 3 |
Measured with lateral flexion test (centimeters) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in hypermobility score |
Measured with Beighton hypermobility score with point values between 0 and 9 where score over 4 indicate general hypermobility. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in neck mobility |
Measured with occiput-to-wall test (points) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in foot pronation |
Measured with navicular drop test (millimeters) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in habitual stance |
Measured with patella mobility test (points) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in health-related quality of life assessed with EQ5D index |
Measured with index values for Euroqol-5 dimensions-3 levels. Minimum -0.59, maximum +1. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in health-related quality of life assessed with EQ5D VAS |
Measured with the 100-point barometer for Euroqol-5 dimensions-3 levels. Minimum 0, maximum 100. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in self-reported physical activity assessed with Swedish questionnaire |
Measured with Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare questionnaire with 2 questions on physical activity and exercise measured in minutes. Minimum 0, maximum measured value 540. Increasing values indicate higher levels of physical activity. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in self-reported physical activity assessed with Saltin Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale (SGPALS) |
Measured with SGPALS with point values between 1 and 4 where increasing values indicate higher level of physical activity. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in self-reported sedentary time |
Measured in hours per day with SED-GIH questionnaire with values between 0 and 24 where increasing sedentary time is considered to have a negative impact on health. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in risk for chronic pain and sickness absence assessed with Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire |
Measured with Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire with scores between 1 and 100 where increasing values indicate higher risk for chronic pain and sickness absence. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in number of pain locations |
Measured with a pain diagram |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in proportion smokers |
Proportion smokers in each group |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in proportion acceptable level blood glucose |
Proportion with blood glucose levels within recommended limits (4.0-6.0 mmol/L) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in proportion acceptable level serum cholesterol |
Proportion with cholesterol levels within recommended limits (3.3-6.9 mmol/L) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in proportion acceptable level triglycerides |
Proportion with triglyceride levels within recommended limits (0,45-2.6) |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in proportion acceptable blood pressure |
Proportion of participants with blood pressure within recommended limits |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in proportion normal body mass index (BMI) |
Proportion of participants with BMI within recommended limits |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in proportion acceptable waist circumference |
Proportion of participants with waist circumference below recommended level |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in stress symptoms assessed with Stress and Crisis Inventory-93 |
Measured with Stress and Crisis Inventory-93 questionnaire. Minimum 0, maximum 140, with higher values indicating higher stress levels. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in depression and anxiety symptoms assessed with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale |
Measured with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Minimum 0, maximum 42 with 21 as maximum for anxiety and 21 maximum for depression. Increasing values indicate more severe symptoms. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Correlation between self-assessed and objectively measured fitness |
Correlation between fitness self-assessed on a 5-point Likert scale and point value on the fitness arm on the study-specific functional profile. Minimum -1, maximum +1. Higher values indicate better correlation between the 2 measures. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Correlation between self-assessed and objectively measured fitness - 2 |
Correlation between fitness self-assessed on a 5-point Likert scale and fitness grade on the Ekblom Bak fitness test (5 point Likert scale). Minimum -1, maximum +1. Higher values indicate better correlation between the 2 measures. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Correlation between self-assessed and objectively measured strength upper extremity |
Correlation between upper extremity strength self-assessed on a 5-point Likert scale and point value for the strength upper extremity arm on the study-specific functional profile. Minimum -1, maximum +1. Higher values indicate better correlation between the 2 measures. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Correlation between self-assessed and objectively measured strength lower extremity |
Correlation between lower extremity strength self-assessed on a 5-point Likert scale and point value for the strength lower extremity arm on the study-specific functional profile. Minimum -1, maximum +1. Higher values indicate better correlation between the 2 measures. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Correlation between self-assessed and objectively measured balance |
Correlation between balance self-assessed on a 5-point Likert scale and point value on the balance arm on the study-specific functional profile. Minimum -1, maximum +1. Higher values indicate better correlation between the 2 measures. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Correlation between self-assessed and objectively measured physical activity |
Correlation between self-assessed walking ability on a 5-point Likert scale and point value on the physical activity arm on the study-specific functional profile. Minimum -1, maximum +1. Higher values indicate better correlation between the 2 measures. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Correlation between self-assessed and objectively measured physical activity - 2 |
Correlation between self-assessed walking ability on a 5-point Likert scale and number of daily minutes in moderate-to-very vigorous physical activity measured with accelerometers. Minimum -1, maximum +1. Higher values indicate better correlation between the 2 measures. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in relative physical activity |
Mean daily minutes of moderate-to-very vigorous physical activity measured with accelerometers for 1 week where moderate is individually calculated in relation to fitness level (46% of VO2max). |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|
Secondary |
Change in sufficient physical activity |
Number of mean daily minutes of physical activity measured with accelerometers for 1 week above a known health-promoting level based on a fitness level of 31.5 ml/kg for women and 35 ml/kg for men. |
Change between baseline and 1-year follow-up |
|