Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Leukemia Clinical Trial

Official title:

ALinC 17: Protocol for Patients With Newly Diagnosed High Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) - Evaluation of the Augmented BFM Regimen: A Phase III Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00005603
• Other study ID #: 9906
• Secondary ID: COG-P9906POG-990
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• First received: May 2, 2000
• Last updated: February 18, 2014
• Start date: March 2000

Study information

• Verified date: February 2014
• Source: Children's Oncology Group
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: United States: Federal Government
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one chemotherapy drug may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective for acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

PURPOSE: Phase III trial to determine the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating children who have newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Description:

OBJECTIVES:

• Determine whether augmented BFM therapy is superior to ALinc 14/15 therapy in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

• Determine whether minimal residual disease after induction therapy is predictive of an inferior prognosis in this patient population.

• Determine the correlation between event-free survival, minimal residual disease, and early response in this patient population treated with this multiple drug regimen.

OUTLINE: Patients are stratified by CNS or testicular disease (yes vs no).

• Induction therapy (weeks 1-5): Patients receive oral prednisone 3 times daily on days 1-29; vincristine IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; daunorubicin IV on days 8, 15, 22; and asparaginase intramuscularly (IM) on days 2, 5, 8, 12, 15, and 19. Patients also receive methotrexate intrathecally (IT) on days 1 and 8. Patients with CNS 2 or 3 disease also receive methotrexate IT on days 15 and 22.

Patients with M1 bone marrow proceed to consolidation therapy. Patients achieving M2 bone marrow on day 29 receive oral prednisone 3 times daily on days 29-42; vincristine IV and daunorubicin IV over 15 minutes on days 29 and 36; and asparaginase IM on days 29, 32, 36, and 39. If bone marrow is M3 on day 29 or M2 on day 43, then patient is off study.

• Consolidation therapy (weeks 6-14): Patients receive cyclophosphamide IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 29; cytarabine subcutaneously (SC) or IV on days 2-5, 9-12, 30-33, and 37-40; oral mercaptopurine daily on days 1-14 and 29-42; vincristine IV on days 15, 22, 43, and 50; asparaginase IM on days 15, 17, 19, 22, 24, 26, 43, 45, 47, 50, 52, and 54; and methotrexate IT on days 1, 15, 29, and 43.

Patients then proceed to interim maintenance and delayed intensification on weeks 15-46. Courses repeat every 16 weeks.

• Maintenance I and II (weeks 15-22 and 31-38): Patients receive vincristine IV and methotrexate IV on days 1, 11, 21, 31, and 41; asparaginase IM on days 2, 12, 22, 32, and 42; and methotrexate IT on days 1 and 31.

• Delayed Intensification (weeks 23-36 and 39-42): Patients receive vincristine IV on days 57, 64, and 71; methotrexate IT on day 57; oral dexamethasone 2-3 times daily on days 57-63 and 71-77; doxorubicin IV over 15 minutes 3 times weekly on days 57, 64, and 71; and asparaginase IM on days 60, 62, 64, 67, 69, and 71.

• Delayed Intensification-Reconsolidation (weeks 27-30 and 43-46): Patients receive oral thioguanine on days 85-98; methotrexate IT on day 85; cyclophosphamide IV over 30 minutes on day 85; cytarabine IV or SC on days 86-89 and 93-96; asparaginase IM on days 99, 101, 103, 106, 108, and 110; and vincristine IV on days 99 and 106.

• Continuation therapy (weeks 47-130): Patients receive vincristine IV on days 1, 29, and 57; oral dexamethasone twice daily for 5 consecutive days on days 1-5, 29-33, and 57-61; oral mercaptopurine on days 1-84; oral methotrexate on days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, and 78; and methotrexate IT on day 1.

Patients with CNS 3 disease or who are within 24 months of diagnosis with an initial WBC ≥ 100,000/mm^3 undergo whole brain radiotherapy (omit or discontinue mercaptopurine and IT methotrexate) on day 1. Testicular radiotherapy also begins on day 1.

Patients may receive oral methotrexate on day 1 of each course (if IT methotrexate is not administered).

Patients are followed every 2 months for 2 years, every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 260 patients will be accrued for this study within 3.1 years.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 276
• Est. primary completion date: September 2005
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 1 Year to 21 Years

Eligibility

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

• Diagnosis of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

• Registered on POG-9900 Classification Study

• Registered within 7 days of documenting complete response after induction on day 29 or, if 2 more weeks of induction are required, no later than day 49

• Classified as high risk:

• No simultaneous trisomy 4 and 10

• No TEL-AML1 gene

• Meets criteria for 1 of the following:

• Any age with WBC > 100,000/mm^3

• CNS and bone marrow evaluations required for those patients with WBC > 100,000/mm^3 who are within 24 months of initial diagnosis

• Age over 12 (boys) or 16 (girls)

• If younger, WBC must be 1 of the following:

• Greater than 80,000/mm^3 (for boys age 8 or girls age 12)

• Greater than 60,000/mm^3 (for boys age 9 or girls age 13)

• Greater than 40,000/mm^3 (for boys age 10 or girls age 14)

• Greater than 20,000/mm^3 (for boys age 11 or girls age 15)

• At least one of the following:

• CNS 3 disease (CSF WBC at least 5/microliter with blasts present)

• Testicular leukemia

• MLL gene rearrangements

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age:

• 1 to 21

Performance status:

• Not specified

Life expectancy:

• Not specified

Hematopoietic:

• See Disease Characteristics

Hepatic:

• Not specified

Renal:

• Not specified

Other:

• Not pregnant or nursing

• Fertile patients must use effective contraception

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy:

• Not specified

Chemotherapy:

• See Disease Characteristics

Endocrine therapy:

• Not specified

Radiotherapy:

• Not specified

Surgery:

• Not specified

Other:

• See Disease Characteristics

Study Design

Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Leukemia
• Leukemia, Lymphoid
• Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

Intervention

Drug:
• asparaginase

• cyclophosphamide

• cytarabine

• daunorubicin hydrochloride

• dexamethasone

• doxorubicin hydrochloride

• mercaptopurine

• methotrexate

• prednisone

• thioguanine

• vincristine sulfate

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Dana-Farber Cancer Institute	Boston	Massachusetts
United States	Albert Einstein Clinical Cancer Center	Bronx	New York
United States	Children's Hospital Medical Center - Cincinnati	Cincinnati	Ohio
United States	University of Texas Medical Branch	Galveston	Texas
United States	Baylor College of Medicine	Houston	Texas
United States	University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center	Houston	Texas
United States	Indiana University Cancer Center	Indianapolis	Indiana
United States	University of Mississippi Medical Center	Jackson	Mississippi
United States	Children's Hospital Los Angeles	Los Angeles	California
United States	Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center	New York	New York
United States	Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford	Palo Alto	California
United States	Saint Jude Midwest Affiliate	Peoria	Illinois
United States	Children's Hospital of Philadelphia	Philadelphia	Pennsylvania
United States	Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh	Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania
United States	Doernbecher Children's Hospital	Portland	Oregon
United States	Mayo Clinic Cancer Center	Rochester	Minnesota
United States	UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center	San Francisco	California
United States	Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center - Seattle	Seattle	Washington
United States	State University of New York - Upstate Medical University	Syracuse	New York
United States	Children's National Medical Center	Washington	District of Columbia

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Children's Oncology Group	National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (17)

Borowitz MJ, Devidas M, Bowman WP, et al.: Prognostic significance of minimal residual disease (MRD) in children with high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL): a Children's Oncology Group study. [Abstract] Blood 106 (11): A-85, 2005.

Borowitz MJ, Devidas M, Hunger SP, Bowman WP, Carroll AJ, Carroll WL, Linda S, Martin PL, Pullen DJ, Viswanatha D, Willman CL, Winick N, Camitta BM; Children's Oncology Group. Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its relationship to other prognostic factors: a Children's Oncology Group study. Blood. 2008 Jun 15;111(12):5477-85. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-132837. Epub 2008 Apr 3. — View Citation

Borowitz MJ, Devidas M, Hunger SP, et al.: Prognostic signficance of end consolidation minimal residual disease (MRD) in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): A report from the Children's Oncology Group (COG). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-10000, 2008.

Bowman WP, Larsen EL, Devidas M, Linda SB, Blach L, Carroll AJ, Carroll WL, Pullen DJ, Shuster J, Willman CL, Winick N, Camitta BM, Hunger SP, Borowitz MJ. Augmented therapy improves outcome for pediatric high risk acute lymphocytic leukemia: results of C — View Citation

Chen IM, Harvey RC, Mullighan CG, Gastier-Foster J, Wharton W, Kang H, Borowitz MJ, Camitta BM, Carroll AJ, Devidas M, Pullen DJ, Payne-Turner D, Tasian SK, Reshmi S, Cottrell CE, Reaman GH, Bowman WP, Carroll WL, Loh ML, Winick NJ, Hunger SP, Willman CL. Outcome modeling with CRLF2, IKZF1, JAK, and minimal residual disease in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group study. Blood. 2012 Apr 12;119(15):3512-22. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-11-394221. Epub 2012 Feb 24. — View Citation

Davies SM, Borowitz MJ, Rosner GL, Ritz K, Devidas M, Winick N, Martin PL, Bowman P, Elliott J, Willman C, Das S, Cook EH, Relling MV. Pharmacogenetics of minimal residual disease response in children with B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Blood. 2008 Mar 15;111(6):2984-90. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-09-114082. Epub 2008 Jan 8. — View Citation

Harvey RC, Chen IM, Ar K, et al.: Identification of novel cluster groups in high-risk pediatric B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR-ALL) by gene expression profiling: correlation with clinical and outcome variables a Children's Oncology Group (COG) study. [Abstract] Blood 112 (11): A-2256, 2008.

Harvey RC, Davidson GS, Wang X, et al.: Expression profiling identifies novel genetic subgroups with distinct clinical features and outcome in high-risk pediatric precursor B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). A Children's Oncology Group study. [Abstra

Harvey RC, Mullighan CG, Chen IM, Wharton W, Mikhail FM, Carroll AJ, Kang H, Liu W, Dobbin KK, Smith MA, Carroll WL, Devidas M, Bowman WP, Camitta BM, Reaman GH, Hunger SP, Downing JR, Willman CL. Rearrangement of CRLF2 is associated with mutation of JAK — View Citation

Kang H, Bedrick EJ, Chen IM, et al.: Molecular classifiers for prediction of minimal residual disease (MRD) and event free survival (EFS) improve risk assignment at diagnosis in pediatric high-risk B precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): a Childre

Kang H, Chen IM, Wilson CS, Bedrick EJ, Harvey RC, Atlas SR, Devidas M, Mullighan CG, Wang X, Murphy M, Ar K, Wharton W, Borowitz MJ, Bowman WP, Bhojwani D, Carroll WL, Camitta BM, Reaman GH, Smith MA, Downing JR, Hunger SP, Willman CL. Gene expression cl — View Citation

Mullighan CG, Morin R, Zhang J, et al.: Next generation transcriptomic resequencing identifies novel genetic alterations in high-risk (HR) childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): A report from the Children's Oncology Group (COG) HR ALL TARGET Projec

Rabin KR, Gramatges MM, Borowitz MJ, Palla SL, Shi X, Margolin JF, Zweidler-McKay PA. Absolute lymphocyte counts refine minimal residual disease-based risk stratification in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Sep;59(3):468-74. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23395. Epub 2011 Nov 18. — View Citation

Yang JJ, Cheng C, Yang W, Pei D, Cao X, Fan Y, Pounds SB, Neale G, Treviño LR, French D, Campana D, Downing JR, Evans WE, Pui CH, Devidas M, Bowman WP, Camitta BM, Willman CL, Davies SM, Borowitz MJ, Carroll WL, Hunger SP, Relling MV. Genome-wide interrogation of germline genetic variation associated with treatment response in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. JAMA. 2009 Jan 28;301(4):393-403. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.7. — View Citation

Yang JJ, Yang W, Cheng C, et al.: Genetically defined racial differences underlie risk of relapse in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. [Abstract] Blood 112 (11): A-14, 2008.

Zhang J, Mullighan CG, Harvey RC, et al.: Mutations in the RAS signaling, B-cell development, TP53/RB1, and JAK signaling pathways are common in high risk B-precursor childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): A report from the Children's Oncology Grou

Zhang J, Mullighan CG, Harvey RC, Wu G, Chen X, Edmonson M, Buetow KH, Carroll WL, Chen IM, Devidas M, Gerhard DS, Loh ML, Reaman GH, Relling MV, Camitta BM, Bowman WP, Smith MA, Willman CL, Downing JR, Hunger SP. Key pathways are frequently mutated in hi — View Citation

* Note: There are 17 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Augmented Berlin Frankfurt Muenster (BFM) therapy is superior to ALinC 14/15 therapy	To determine for patients at high risk for treatment failure if the augmented Berlin Frankfurt Muenster (BFM) therapy is superior to ALinC 14/15 therapy, on the basis of historical controls.		Yes