Clinical Trials Logo

Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03723681 Completed - Clinical trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Study of Quizartinib in Combination With Standard Therapies in Chinese Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Start date: November 5, 2018
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

20 mg or 40 mg of quizartinib will be given to Chinese patients who were just diagnosed with AML. The study drug will be given to them along with standard therapies. The purpose is to find out the highest dose they can stand.

NCT ID: NCT03723135 Approved for marketing - Clinical trials for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)

Expanded Access for CC-486

Start date: n/a
Phase:
Study type: Expanded Access

This is an expanded access program (EAP) for eligible participants designed to provide access to CC-486.

NCT ID: NCT03720366 Completed - Clinical trials for Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

A Study of Perpetrator Drug Interactions of Enasidenib in AML Patients

Start date: October 4, 2018
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

This is a 2-part, open-label, interventional study conducted in approximately 42 subjects with AML harboring an IDH2 mutation. The overall study is a 3-arm investigation of the PK effects of enasidenib at steady state on the probe compounds. (Part 1), followed by treatment continuation up to 28 months (Part 2). Each arm utilizes different probe compounds; enrolls a separate cohort of approximately 14 subjects; and consists of 2 parts - investigation of the PK effects of enasidenib on the respective probe compound(s) (Part 1), followed by an enasidenib treatment extension (Part 2).

NCT ID: NCT03719534 Completed - Clinical trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Haplo HCT vs Haplo-cord HCT for Patients With AML

Start date: June 1, 2017
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Patients who have acute myeloid leukemia and will undergo haplo-identical donor hematopoeitic cell transplantation (haplo HCT) are potential candidates of this trial. Participants will randomized into two arms: Arm A will undergo a typical haplo HCT, while Arm B will receive an coinfusion of an unrelated cord blood unit (haplo-cord HCT) in addition to Arm A. Progression-free survival, overall survival, cumulative incidence of relapse and nonrelapse mortality will be recorded as endpoints.

NCT ID: NCT03719183 Completed - Clinical trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Comparison of Diagnostic Yield Among M-FISH, FISH Probe Panel and Conventional Cytogenetic Analysis in AML

Start date: January 1, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Conventional cytogenetic studies have been the gold standard for more than five decades for detecting genetic alterations that are greater than 10 Mb (mega base pairs) in size. Conventional cytogenetic studies have paved the way in identifying specific chromosomal aberrations associated with clinically and morphologically definitive subsets of hematological neoplasms. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has become a reliable and rapid complementary test in targeting critical genetic events associated with diagnostics and prognosis in hematological neoplasms. In the current health care environment, which increasingly focuses on value and efficiency, it is critical for pathologists and clinicians to effectively navigate this environment and judiciously incorporate these high-complexity and expensive techniques into routine patient care. While conventional karyotyping provides a comprehensive view of the genome, FISH can detect cryptic or submicroscopic genetic abnormalities and identify recurrent genetic abnormalities in nondividing cells. As a consequence, it is commonly extrapolated that FISH will improve the sensitivity of detecting all genetic abnormalities compared with conventional karyotyping analysis. This assumption has then been translated in clinical practice to having clinicians and pathologists routinely ordering both conventional karyotyping and FISH studies in patients with hematological neoplasms. Depending on how comprehensive the FISH panel is, the cost for this testing may be quite expensive, and its additive value remains questionable. It is common practice for laboratories to use FISH panels in conjunction with karyotyping both in diagnostic specimens and during follow-up to monitor response to therapy. Multiplex FISH (M-FISH) represents one of the most significant developments in molecular cytogenetics of the past decade. In tumor and leukemia cytogenetics, two groups have been targeted by M-FISH to identify cryptic chromosome rearrangements not detectable by conventional cytogenetic studies: those with an apparently normal karyotype (suspected of harboring small rearrangements not detectable by conventional cytogenetics) and those with a complex aberrant karyotype (which are difficult to karyotype accurately due to the sheer number of aberrations).

NCT ID: NCT03718143 Terminated - Clinical trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

AZD1775 in Advanced Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Myelofibrosis

Start date: May 8, 2019
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

A phase II study testing the efficacy of combined AZD1775 with AraC or single agent activity of AZD1775 in three arms: Arm A has subjects age 60 years or older who are newly diagnosed with AML receiving the combination of the drugs; Arm B has subjects who are have relapsed/refractory AML and HMA failure MDS patients being allocated to either the combination Arm B or single agent AZD1775 Arm C.

NCT ID: NCT03715621 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Prognostic Values of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients With Allo-HSCT

Start date: October 15, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a genetically heterogeneous disease and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a curative treatment option for AML except for AML-M3. Relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure after allo-HSCT. Molecular residual disease has been shown to be a strong risk factor for relapse after HSCT. In this study, the investigators will detect mutations before/after allo-HSCT by using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technique to measure residual disease and evaluate the prognostic impact of molecular residual disease in a cohort of AML participants receiving allo-HSCT.

NCT ID: NCT03709758 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Venetoclax in Combination With Intensive Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy in Treatment Naïve AML

Start date: October 17, 2018
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

This research study is studying the combination of venetoclax and chemotherapy as a possible treatment for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). The drugs involved in this study are: - Venetoclax - Daunorubicin - Cytarabine

NCT ID: NCT03709576 Terminated - Clinical trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Pevonedistat and Azacitidine as Maintenance Therapy After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Non-Remission AML

Start date: July 18, 2018
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This research is being done to find out the toxicity and efficacy of a combination of Pevonedistat and Azacitidine as post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant maintenance therapy for non-remission AML and to see the overall diseases free survival, relapse, and GVHD after treatment.

NCT ID: NCT03705858 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Actinium-225-Lintuzumab in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Start date: February 28, 2019
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to see what dose of 225Ac-lintuzumab is safest to give to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who are in remission but still have minimal residual disease (MRD). About 12 subjects will be asked to take part in this phase 1, 3+3 dose-escalation study. In addition to confirming the safety profile of postremission therapy with 225Ac-lintuzumab, preliminary evidence of efficacy will be assessed by estimating progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and serially evaluating for MRD using cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), or flow cytometric assays, as applicable.