View clinical trials related to Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute.
Filter by:Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a haematological malignant disease characterized by an uncontrolled proliferation of immature hematopoietic cells. Over the last two decades, clinical trials have demonstrated an improved response rate in younger adult AML. Aggressive induction plus more potent intensification programs with chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus stem cell transplantation (SCT) has improved treatment results. Advances in understanding disease biology, improvements in induction and consolidation program, and better supportive care have also all contributed. A number of clinical and laboratory characteristics influence the response to treatment and, thus, the survival of patients with AML. Among them, cytogenetic at diagnosis represents the most important prognostic variable. However, other factors may have a prognostic value and may influence patient's outcome. Anaemia and thrombocytopenia are cardinal manifestations of AML. Over the last decades, it has become apparent that the frequency of allogeneic blood transfusions can modify host immunity and clinical outcomes. Anaemia has long been recognized as an adverse prognostic factor in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), which represents a pre-leukemic disease. Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion need was identified as a strong and independent risk factor for survival in MDS, for which the presence and severity of anaemia were attributed to a clonally advanced and biologically more aggressive disease. Based on these data, the investigators retrospectively assessed the prognostic value of RBC and platelet transfusions at the time of diagnosis and the frequency of transfusions during the first induction course of chemotherapy in a large unselected group of patients with previously untreated AML.
Patients aged ≥70 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have a poorer prognosis than those aged 60 to 69 years. The poor outcome is the result of treatment-related toxicity in elderly patients, owing to comorbidities, the greater possibility of other hematopoietic disorders, and a biologically poor risk prognosis. Anthracycline- and cytarabine-based therapy, administered for 3 and 7 days respectively (3 +7), remains the standard induction therapy for this patient population. This approach improved survival compared with supportive care (median, 5 vs. 3 months) for adults aged ≥ 65 years. However, the overall view has been that the results of intensive chemotherapy in elderly patients remain poor. Although complete remission (CR) rates of 40% to 80% can be achieved in highly selected populations, long-term survival has been poor. Furthermore, most clinical trials have only enrolled patients with an adequate performance status (PS). Prognostic models have been developed from clinical trial data to predict the outcomes for older patients. However; each model relies on chronologic age. Age is a surrogate measure for both changes in tumor biology and patient characteristics. Understanding which patients are likely to benefit from intensive therapies versus low-intensity therapies or supportive care is critical. The definition of "fit" to undergo intensive induction therapy has not been established, and the therapeutic choice is mainly determined by physician and patient decision. In older patients, low-dose cytarabine (LD-AraC) has been demonstrated to be more beneficial than best supportive care and hydroxyurea. The recent availability of new drugs that could have an improved side effect profile and, in some cases, bioavailability might offer future improvement for this patient population. In this setting, the investigators have tended to consider, since 2007, patients aged ≥70 years as potential candidates for alternative lower intensity therapy (LD-AraC, hypomethylating agents) even when they presented in good physical condition. The investigators goal was to determine whether age ≥ 70 years could represent a useful and simple cut off for treatment decision-making in clinical practice and whether low-intensity therapy could be an alternative therapeutic approach to intensive chemotherapy even for patients aged ≥ 70 years who were theoretically "fit" (WHO /ECOG/ PS of ≤ 2).
This is an open label study of the dose and duration of an orally administered lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) inhibitor, bomedemstat, in patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Some participants may also receive all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA; also known as tretinoin and Vesanoid®) in combination with bomedemstat. This study investigates the following: - The safety and tolerability of bomedemstat with and without ATRA - The pharmacodynamic effect of different doses of bomedemstat and treatment durations, as well as bomedemstat administered in combination with ATRA - The pharmacokinetics of bomedemstat with and without ATRA
This is a post-authorization, retrospective multicentre observational nationwide study (PAS-OD). It will be conducted by reviewing medical records and database of patients who participated in the validation of the psychometric properties of the GAH study (CEL-GAH-2011-01). In all cases, only data prior to the start date of the study will be collected to ensure its retrospective nature, thereby reflecting routine clinical practice and non-interference in the physician's clinical practice
Over recent decades, improvements have been made in the treatment of adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This has been mainly attributed to improvements in supportive therapy and to intensification of treatment strategies. The introduction of a post-induction myeloablative regimen followed by allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) has reduced the relapse rate in younger adults. However, this procedure is limited by the availability of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical donors and conventional SCT preparative regimens according to patient age. In the absence of a compatible donor, myeloablative chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood (PB) SCT remains one treatment strategy in adult patients with AML, allowing 35 - 50% long-term survivors. Despite several advantages of the CD34+ cell mobilization procedure, recent data have shown that relapse was higher and leukemia-free survival (LFS) shorter compared with bone marrow (BM) autografts. Higher doses of CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are collected to ensure engraftment and possibly reduce the incidence of treatment-related mortality (TRM). Although there is a threshold CD34+ cell dose below which engraftment is delayed in AML, the positive linear correlation of the number of CD34+ cells and kinetics of engraftment reaches a limit above which an increase in the number of progenitor cells does not provide any additional benefit. Relapse has been shown to be higher and survival shorter for those who receive the highest CD34+ PB doses. Although highly active against the leukemia bulk, intensive chemotherapy often spares the hardiest leukemia stem cells (LSCs) responsible for relapse. Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in autologous PBSC products may reflect inadequate in vivo purging, at least in part responsible for relapse. Although representing a heterogeneous cell population including both normal and leukemia cells, and despite that recent data have challenged the CD34+ CD38- phenotype of LSCs in AML, the CD34+ CD38- cell population generally remains considered enriched for LSCs. In this setting, MRD remaining during morphological complete remission (CR) should be relatively enriched in CD34+ CD38- leukemia cells, and their persistence after CR achievement should correlate with disease recurrence. This was investigated in a cohort of 123 patients with AML following apheresis procedures after CR achievement. The investigators also studied the impact of the infused dose of subpopulations of CD34+ PB cells on the outcome of a subset of 71 patients who further underwent autologous PBSCT.
The purpose of this study is to characterize the regimen limiting toxicities (RLT) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of indoximod in patients with newly diagnosed AML receiving remission induction chemotherapy with cytarabine and idarubicin.
This is a phase 1b, dose escalation, study of quizartinib to evaluate the safety profile, the pharmacokinetics, and the recommended dose of quizartinib for subsequent clinical studies of the combination of quizartinib and induction and consolidation chemotherapy.
The purpose of this study is to see whether HLA-mismatched donor cells infusion with chemotherapy (microtransplantation，MST) could increase complete remission (CR) and improve survival in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)，the investigators conducted a prospective, multicenter clinical trial of HLA-mismatched MST to estimate outcomes and toxicities.
The purpose of this study is to determine the activity of tamibarotene in participants with relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML (administered as a monotherapy or in combination with azacitidine), R/R higher-risk MDS (HR-MDS) (administered as a monotherapy or in combination with daratumumab), newly diagnosed treatment naïve AML participants who are unlikely to tolerate standard intensive chemotherapy (administered as a monotherapy or in combination with azacitidine), or lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) (administered as a monotherapy).
A Phase 2 study to investigate the antitumor activity in terms of overall response rate (ORR) of tipifarnib in approximately 36 eligible subjects with Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasias (MDS/MPN), including Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML), and 36 eligible subjects with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Subjects (amendment 3 Cohorts 1-4) will receive tipifarnib administered at a dose of 400 mg, orally with food, twice a day (bid) for 21 days in 28 day cycles.