View clinical trials related to Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to find out if oral decitabine-cedazuridine (Inqovi®) is effective, safe, and able to be tolerated without severe side effects when given with thioguanine (Tabloid®) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) whose disease has returned or did not respond to treatment (relapsed or refractory). This is a "phase II trial with a safety lead-in." The goal of the lead-in portion of the study is to make sure participants are getting the highest dose of medications that are safe. If too many serious side effects are seen with the dose previously studied, some additional patients may be treated with a lower dose to make sure that this dose is safe.
Investigator proposed to apply the new dosage form of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposomes to the clinical treatment of AML, while combining with cytarabine and azacitidine to form the MA+AZA treatment regimen(Mitoxantrone liposome +Ara-Cytarabine+Azacitidine), which would provide an optimal induction treatment regimen for patients with primary AML by comparing with the traditional chemotherapy regimen, DA+AZA (Daunorubicin+Ara-Cytarabine+Azacitidine).
The goal of this clinical trial] is to evaluate mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposomes, subcutaneous injection of cytarabine and G-CSF combined with Venetoclax (CMG+Ven) in adult secondary acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome with increased primordial cells type 2(MDS-IB2) or elderly acute myeloid leukemia]. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Evaluation of the efficacy - Evaluation of the safety
This study is a clinical trial aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of the VHEA（Venetoclax with Homoharringtonine，Etoposide，Cytarabine）regimen in the treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with MLL gene abnormalities. This study includes the induction and consolidation phases of AML treatment.
Chemo-induced mucositis is a common complication in patients treated for hematologic malignancies. They can manifest itself as a simple local irritation with erythema and inflammation but can also progress to erosions and ulcerations of the entire oral mucosa and are also responsible for an increased risk of infection in these immunocompromised patients. The only therapies currently offered are local care and intravenous analgesics. Studies in pediatric hematology show the effectiveness of prevention and low-dose laser treatment in chemo-induced mucositis, both in terms of reducing the number of mucositis developed but also in terms of reducing the grade of mucositis. This currently results in a recommendation for the use of photobiomodulation by international bodies such as ESMO (European Society for Medical Oncology).
The purpose of the study is to observe the outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia who do not receive an immediate second round of chemotherapy after undergoing a standard mid-induction bone marrow biopsy.
This phase II MyeloMATCH treatment trial compares the usual treatment of azacitidine and venetoclax to the combination treatment of azacitidine, venetoclax and gilteritinib in treating older and unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia and FLT3 mutations. Azacitidine is a drug that is absorbed into DNA and leads to the activation of cancer suppressor genes, which are genes that help control cell growth. Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Gilteritinib is in a class of medications called kinase inhibitors. It works by blocking the action of a certain naturally occurring substance that may be needed to help cancer cells multiply. This study may help doctors find out if these different approaches are better than the usual approaches. To decide if they are better, the study doctors are looking to see if the study drugs lead to a higher percentage of patients achieving a deeper remission compared to the usual approach.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of avapritinib in relapsed or refractory pediatric core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia with KIT mutation.
The goal of this study is to determine the safety and antitumor effects of REM-422, a MYB mRNA degrader, in people with Higher Risk MDS and relapsed/refractory AML
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignant disorder of the bone marrow and the most common form of acute leukemia in adults. Patient with AML have the shortest survival compared to other forms of leukemia. In the past 6 years, several new therapies have been approved. Biomarkers are in urgent need to guide therapeutic regimen selection in order to maximize the benefit of available therapies and minimize treatment toxicity. Current standard practice is to perform bone marrow biopsy at end of treatment cycle (each cycle around 28 days), and based on bone marrow finding, to decide further treatment plan. It is invasive and time consuming. The research we are proposing here is to investigate whether tracking leukemia stem cells (LSC) in peripheral blood during early treatment cycle may provide a non-invasive method to predict therapeutic outcome at end of treatment cycle. Our retrospective study have found that LSC fractional change, defined by two LSC markers, named CLL1 and CD45RA, is highly correlated with therapeutic outcome. Further more, CLL1 and CD45RA positive LSC fraction demonstrates a high concordance between bone marrow and peripheral blood, offering the opportunity to track CLL1 and CD45RA positive LSC fraction non-invasively in peripheral blood during treatment. This pilot study will allow us to decide whether testing CLL1 and CD45RA positive LSC in peripheral blood during leukemia treatment is feasible in clinical practice. This result will lay the foundation for designing future trials using CLL1 and CD45RA positive LSC fractional change to optimize therapeutic strategy for patients with AML.