View clinical trials related to Leukemia, Biphenotypic, Acute.
Filter by:This is a Phase II study following subjects proceeding with our Institutional non-myeloablative cyclophosphamide/ fludarabine/total body irradiation (TBI) preparative regimen followed by a related, unrelated, or partially matched family donor stem cell infusion using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), sirolimus and MMF GVHD prophylaxis.
This is a single arm pilot study for patients with hematologic malignancies receiving unrelated or haploidentical related mobilized peripheral stem cells (PSCs) using the CliniMACS system for alpha/beta T cell depletion plus CD19+ B cell depletion with individualized ALC-based dosing of ATG to study impact on engraftment, GVHD, and disease free survival
This Phase 1 study will assess the safety, tolerability, and preliminary antileukemic activity of ziftomenib in combination with venetoclax and azacitidine (ven/aza), ven, and 7+3 for two different molecularly-defined arms, NPM1-m and KMT2A-r.
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the safety and feasibility of allogeneic transplantation with bone marrow from a deceased donor in patients with acute leukemias. Patients will either receive myeloablative conditioning or reduced intensity conditioning regimen prior to the transplant. Patients will be followed for 56 days for safety endpoints and remain in follow-up for one year.
GVHD prevention using a combination of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in combination with abatacept, vedolizumab and calcineurin inhibitor in children and young adults with hematoloblastosis after myeloablative conditioning regimen with treosulfan/TBI, cyclophosphamide/etoposide, fludarabine after HSCT from matched unrelated and haploidentical donors
Multicenter single arm study to assess the safety and efficacy of allogeneic transplantation using cryopreserved bone marrow from deceased MMUD and PTCy, sirolimus and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis.
This is a multi-phase, multi-center, single arm, prospective study designed to establish the safety and efficacy of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched unrelated cryopreserved deceased donor bone marrow transplantation (BMT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for patients with hematologic malignancies.
HSCT from an allogeneic donor is the standard therapy for high-risk hematopoietic malignancies and a wide range of severe non-malignant diseases of the blood and immune system. The possibility of performing HSCT was significantly limited by the availability of donors compatible with the MHC system. However, modern ex-vivo and in vivo technologies for depletion of T lymphocytes have made it possible to improve the outcomes of HSCT from partially compatible related (haploidentical) donors. In representative groups, it was shown that the success of HSCT from haploidentical donors is not inferior to standard procedures of HSCT from HLA-compatible unrelated donors. HSCT from haploidentical donors in children associated with the deficit of the adaptive immune response, which persists up to 6 months after HSCT and can be an increased risk of death of the patient from opportunistic infections. To solve this problem, the method of infusion of low doses of donor memory T lymphocytes was introduced. This technology is based on the possibility of adoptive transfer of memory immune response to key viral pathogens from donor to recipient. Such infusions have been shown to be safe and to accelerate the recovery of the pathogen-specific immune response. The expansion of virus-specific T lymphocytes in the recipient's body depends on exposure to the relevant antigen in vivo. Thus, in the absence of contact with the viral antigen, the adoptive transfer of memory T lymphocytes is not accompanied in vivo by the expansion of virus-specific lymphocytes and does not form a circulating pool of memory T lymphocytes, that can protect the patient from infections. Therefore the investigators assume that ex-vivo priming of donor memory lymphocytes with relevant antigens can provide optimal antigenic stimulation and may solve the problem of restoring immunological reactivity in the early stages after HSCT. Technically ex-vivo primed memory T lymphocytes will be generated by short incubation of CD45RA-depleted fraction of the graft (a product of T lymphocyte depletion) with a pool of GMP-quality peptides representing a number of key proteins of the viral pathogens. The following are proposed as targeted antigens: CMV pp65, EBV EBNA-1, EBV LMP12A, Adeno AdV5 Hexon, BKV LT, BKV VP1. An infusion of donor memory lymphocytes will be performed on the day +1 after transplantation. Parameters of the assessment will be safety and efficacy (immune response by day 60 and stability (responses by day 180).
This phase II trial studies the effects of venetoxlax in combination with decitabine and cedazuridine in treating patients with acute myeloid leukemia that has come back (relapsed) or does not respond to treatment (refractory). Chemotherapy drugs, such as venetoclax and decitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Cedazuridine may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Giving venetoxlax in combination with decitabine and cedazuridine may help to control acute myeloid leukemia.
Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation irrespective of the conditioning and graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis is associated with high frequency of primary and secondary graft failure. Different technologies of with replete or depleted graft are associated with 10-20% of graft failures. Fludarabine and busulfan conditioning is the most commonly used approach for a variety of disease. Furthermore combination of fludarabine and bendamustine was sufficient to facilitate engraftment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and lymphomas. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether addition of bendamustine to fladarabine and busulfan conditioning reduces the risk of primary graft failure after haploidentical allograft.