Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02480413
Other study ID # KEK-ZH-Nr. 2015-0191 - Part 1
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received June 21, 2015
Last updated April 6, 2016
Start date July 2015
Est. completion date March 2016

Study information

Verified date April 2016
Source University Children's Hospital, Zurich
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Switzerland: Ethikkommission
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this prospective single center study is to investigate if a developed algorithm is more accurate than the pediatric emergency tape (Alpha 1 Werbedesign e.K., Falkenberg, Germany). For this study 500 patients are required to collect anonymized data (length, weight, age, anaesthesia material used during anaesthesia) for achieving a power of 80% during statistical analysis. The main hypothesis ist that the algorithm has a better accuracy than the pediatric emergency tape (53% are in a +/- 10% interval).


Description:

This prospective single center study is performed at the university children's hospital zurich. Patients planned for surgery in general anaesthesia with intubation, aged 0 to 16 years and with a body length suitable for the emergency tapes can be included in this study. Patient and parental information is performed during the pre-anaesthetic visit. After written consent the patient will be included. Patient´s length and weight will be measures earliest one day before data collection. Data collection during anaesthesia has no influence on the daily anaesthesia routine and has no impact on patient safety and anaesthesia. Patient's data is made anonymous for further inspection.

Data is documented in Microsoft Excel and statistical analysis calculated with SPSS. 500 patients are needed for a power of 80%. Primary outcome parameter is length-based weight estimation, secondary outcome parameters are length-based age estimation and the correctness of recommended anaesthesia material (endotracheal tube, laryngeal mask, oropharyngeal mask and face mask). Both tools (algorithm and pediatric emergency tape) will be compared with eachother regarding primary and secondary outcome parameters.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 492
Est. completion date March 2016
Est. primary completion date March 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Both
Age group N/A to 16 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- body length suitable with the investigated emergency tapes

- all patients aged 0 -16 years

- receiving general anaesthesia with intubation

Exclusion Criteria:

- Already included in this study once

- missing patient or parental consent

Study Design

Observational Model: Case-Only, Time Perspective: Prospective


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Accuracy of an algorithm and the pediatric emergency tape.
No intervention

Locations

Country Name City State
Switzerland University Childrens Hospital Zurich

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University Children's Hospital, Zurich

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Switzerland, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary length based weight estimation by algorithm during anaesthesia No
Secondary length based age estimation during anaesthesia No
Secondary size of endotracheal tube during anaesthesia No
Secondary size of laryngeal mask during anaesthesia No
Secondary size of facemask during anaesthesia No
Secondary size of oropharyngeal tube during anaesthesia No