View clinical trials related to Leishmaniasis.
Filter by:The objectives of the study are to evaluate the safety and efficacy of open label treatment with WR 279,396 (topical paromomycin & gentamicin) in patients with non-complicated, non-severe cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL).
This study is designed to determine the efficacy of Fexinidazole as an oral treatment in Visceral Leishmanisasis sudanese adults patients. The results of this proof of concept study will allow to make a decision on whether to proceed with clinical development of Fexinidazole for visceral leishmaniasis.
We hypothesize that PKDL develop after SSG as well as after Miltefosine mono-therapy for VL; anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10, TGF-β, serum lipids play key role for its pathogenesis & PKDL patients are genetically predisposed; diagnostic tool based on immunofluorescence technique will be more sensitive than slit skin examination for diagnosis of PKDL.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic response to fluconazole in patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by and L.(V.)guyanensis and L.(V.) braziliensis.
The aim of this work was to investigate the healthcare professionals' knowledge about leishmaniasis in Divinópolis, an endemic county of Minas Gerais state, Brazil.
This study is a single-site trial assessing the specificity of CL Detect™ Rapid Test versus the gold standard for Leishmania diagnosis in the US which is microscopic identification of Leishmania amastigotes in a stained lesion sample. Subjects will be patients who present for dermatology consultation with a primarily ulcerated lesion. After informed consent is obtained and the subject is screened for eligibility, 2 diagnostic samples will be collected from the subject's lesion in the following order: 1) one sample will be obtained with a dental broach for use with the CL Detect™ Rapid Test and 2) a second sample will be obtained by scraping for use in the microscopic identification of amastigotes. Samples will be analyzed by microscopy and CL Detect™ Rapid Test. The CL Detect™ Rapid Test will be performed by different operators who are clinical staff members. These staff members, blinded to each other's results, will evaluate the samples from each method independently. Each of the 150 study subjects will be followed administratively to the point where a diagnosis is established (if possible) for their tested lesion, even if that diagnosis is not cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). If a specific diagnosis cannot be determined for a non-CL lesion, the investigator will assign a "likely etiology" (eg, infectious, oncological, immunological, vascular, or "undetermined/other" origin). Based on the diagnosis determined for each lesion, subjects will be referred for appropriate treatment.
The proposed study encompasses a two-step approach. The first aiming to determine the safety of Topical 3% Amphotericin B Cream when applied three or two times per day for 4 weeks in subjects with un-complicated Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) whilst the second focusing in having and indication of the efficacy of the two above mentioned regimens of Topical 3% Amphotericin B Cream For the first step, 30 subjects will be randomly assigned to receive direct observed treatment (DOT) with Topical 3% Amphotericin B Cream applied either three or two times per day for 4 weeks. Enrolment will be temporarily halted until all 30 subjects (15 in each group) have been enrolled and completed the 28 day treatment course. An interim analysis of all safety (Adverse Events, including local reactions and lab parameters) and pharmacokinetics collected on subjects who were randomized will be performed by data safety monitoring board. If no serious adverse events (SAEs) related to the study drug are identified on the first 30 subjects by the end of the treatment course, 50 additional subjects will be randomly allocated to receive Topical 3% Amphotericin B Cream either three or two times per day for 28 days Subjects will have a follow-up visit at the end of therapy, on Day 45± 5 days, Day 63± 5 days and on Days 90± 14 days and on Day 180, minus 14d, plus 4 weeks to assess efficacy, as measured by the number of subjects who fulfil the cure criteria: 100% re-epithelialization of the lesion(s) by Day 90 and no relapse by Day 180. All subjects will be followed up to Day 180 for final analysis of efficacy.
This study is a pivotal Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, 3-site, two-group trial assessing the efficacy and safety of WR 279,396 Topical Cream and Paromomycin Alone Topical Cream in subjects with CL in Panama. The primary objective of this study is to determine if WR 279,396 results in statistically superior final clinical cure rates of an index lesion when compared with Paromomycin Alone for the treatment of CL in Panama expected to be caused by L panamensis.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of CL Detect, in subjects with suspected CL in Tunisia.
Tropical fevers have been a diagnostic challenge from the antiquity. Nowadays, despite the availability of good diagnostic capacities, undifferentiated febrile illnesses continue to be a thorny problem for travel physicians. In developing countries, the scarcity of skilled personnel and adequate laboratory facilities makes the differential diagnosis of fevers even more complex. Health care workers must often rely on syndrome-oriented empirical approaches to treatment and might overestimate or underestimate the likelihood of certain diseases. For instance Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD) contribute substantially to the burden of persistent (more than 1 week) fevers in the Tropics, causing considerable mortality and major disability. These diseases are however rarely diagnosed at primary health care (PHC) level. The difficulty in establishing the cause of febrile illnesses has resulted in omission or delays in treatment, irrational prescriptions with polytherapy, increasing cost and development of drug resistance. In resource-limited settings, clinical algorithms constitute a valuable aid to health workers, as they facilitate the therapeutic decision in the absence of good laboratory capacities. There is a critical lack of appropriate diagnostic tools to guide treatment of NTDs. While clinical algorithms have been developed for some NTDs, in most cases they remain empirical. Besides, they rarely take into account local prevalence data, do not adequately represent the spectrum of patients and differential diagnosis at the primary care level and often have not been properly validated. The purpose of the study is to develop evidence-based Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT)-supported diagnostic guidelines for patients with persistent fever (≥ 1 week) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Sudan, Cambodia and Nepal.