View clinical trials related to Leg Ulcer.
Filter by:The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical benefit of CureXcell® as adjunct to Standard of Care in the treatment of Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers. CureXcell® is a cell based therapy, containing activated homologous white blood cells prepared from donated healthy whole blood. A total of 252 patients will be randomized to receive either CureXcell® or Placebo.
Evaluation of the non-inferiority of TulleGras M.S.® versus Urgotul® in pain associated with removal of wound dressing during care of venous leg ulcer
Given the propensity for venous leg ulcers to become refractory, long standing lesions, incorporating active biologic grafts into the standard compression therapy, has shown to accelerate wound healing. The two products to be compared in this study are both commonly used for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Apligraf is considered a medical device by the FDA, and was cleared for the treatment of venous leg ulcers in 1998. It is a staple for the treatment of venous leg ulcers, and is widely used throughout the United States. It is composed of a type 1 collagen matrix in which human foreskin-derived neonatal fibroblasts are grown, and over which human foreskin-derived neonatal keratinocytes are then cultured and allowed to stratify. TheraSkin is composed of a split thickness skin graft harvested within 24 hours post-mortem, from an organ donor who has cleared the standard safety screenings. It is classified by the FDA as a donated tissue. Once harvested, the graft is sanitized according to FDA specifications, and cryopreserved, until it is delivered to the clinic for application to the foot ulcer. It is also a widely used treatment for diabetic foot ulcers. TREATMENT RATIONALE FOR THIS STUDY Chronic wounds of the lower extremities affect a substantial proportion of the population. Venous leg ulcers (VLU) account for 40-70% of lower extremity wounds. The standard of care for treatment of VLU's in wound centers in the United States is compression therapy combined with application of biologic graft materials to the wound bed. This study may assist physicians who treat VLU's by comparing efficacy and costs of two commonly used biologic graft materials for VLU's in a randomized prospective study. In addition to standard compression therapy, this investigation will be a head-to-head study comparing widely used bio-engineered skin substitute (Apligraf) to cryopreserved, human skin allograft (Theraskin). There is no randomized, prospective data comparing these two graft options in the treatment of VLU's.
Wound healing rate is higher when contact ultrasound therapy is followed by noncontact ultrasound therapy on sub-acute and chronic lower extremity ulcers of various etiologies requiring selective debridement, as compared to either Sonoca-180 or MIST Therapy alone.
The main objective of this study is to assess the safety and the efficacy of EscharEx in preparing the wound's bed in patients with hard to heal venous leg ulcers, diabetic lower extremity ulcers and traumatic/post operative wounds. This study will be a multi-center, assessor blinded, randomized, controlled study intended to demonstrate superiority of EscharEx debriding treatment over the Gel Vehicle control treatment in patients with hard to heal wounds. 72 + 24 adults with >50% necrotic/slough/fibrin non-viable tissue on a hard to heal wound (venous leg ulcer, diabetic lower extremity ulcer or traumatic/ post operative wound) between 5 cm2 and 200 cm2 (surface area in stage 1) or 3 cm2 - 150 cm2 (in stage 2), will be enrolled into the study. Patients will undergo a 1 week screening period (2 visits) which will include: record of demographics, medical history and concomitant medications, vital signs, physical examination, clinical laboratory tests, wound photography and assessments and questionnaires (wound status and quality of life). During this period wounds will be treated by standard treatment per the decision of the physician. During this screening period, subjects whose study wound size (surface area) decreases by more than 20 percent will be excluded. Following completion of the screening process, eligible patients will be randomized to either EscharEx or Gel vehicle debridement treatments. In stage 1 (72 patients): Treatment will be performed for up to 10 applications or until complete debridement is achieved, whichever occurs first. In stage 2 (24 patients): Treatment will be performed for up to 8 applications or until complete debridement is achieved, whichever occurs first. Following each application the wound will be washed, photographed and assessed for wound size, removal of nonviable tissue and change in granulation tissue (by digital planimetry software), wound status, and safety parameters. Subsequent to each debridement treatment the wound will be dressed with moist-to-moist saline gauze (except when successive 24h or 48h treatments are performed, in the second stage). Following completion of the debridement treatment period, patients will be treated according to standard procedures and evaluated (wound assessments) once a week until complete wound closure for up to 12 weeks from last application (up to 12 visits). Only during the first stage of the study, for patients who achieved wound closure, additional 3 monthly (3 visits) follow- up visits of wound closure recurrence will be conducted. Quality of life (QoL) will be evaluated at the last follow-up visit - 3 months post wound closure follow-up period. For patients who didn't achieve wound closure only the 3 months FU visit will be conducted. For patients enrolled at the second stage, if wound closure was achieved at the 12 weeks follow-up, additional visit will be performed 2 weeks later to confirm wound closure.
The objective of the study is to demonstrate that treatment with Apligraf reduces venous leg ulcer (VLU)-related pain and improves the quality of life (QOL) of patients with a painful VLU.
The overall objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of dehydrated human amnion/ chorion membrane (dHACM) in reducing time to complete wound closure in patients with venous leg ulcers (VLUs).
The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of VitroGro® combined with standard care in the treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers (VLUs) compared to Placebo with standard care over the course of the 8-week treatment phase.
This observational safety follow-up study enrolled subjects from the 802-247-09-032 study with the investigational product HP802-247 for venous leg ulcers, who received at least one application of HP802-247 or Vehicle (Placebo). This study is being done for the following purposes: 1. to identify new adverse events, 2. to examine ongoing adverse events not resolved in subjects who participated in the 802-247-09-032 trial, 3. to record wound status, and 4. to determine if there are differences in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) associated with the treatment assignment from the 802-247-09-032 Trial. About 440 subjects were to participate depending upon subject enrollment from the previous study, 802-247-09-032. The study was conducted in approximately 50 sites in Europe.
The purpose of this reseach study is to determine Mölnlycke Health Care´s Leia dressing performance properties is fulfilled and that the dressing is safe when used on wound types such as pressure ulcer, leg ulcer, and diabetic foot ulcer.