Clinical Trials Logo

Leg Length Inequality clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Leg Length Inequality.

Filter by:
  • Not yet recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06156384 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Leg Length Inequality

Study to Assess the Pain, Satisfaction, and Quality of Life of Patients With FITBONE® Lengthening Nail

FitForFrance
Start date: May 15, 2024
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This study is a prospective observational non-interventional multi-centre cohort study of patients, 12 years or older, initiating a lower limb lengthening procedure with FITBONE and who have a length discrepancy of 30mm or more between the limbs. The following parameters will be assessed for up to 24 months. - Pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Patient Global Assessment (PGA) and Clinical Observer Global Assessment (COGA) - Patient satisfaction using the Patient Global Impression of change (PGI-C) scale - QoL using the 36-Item Short Form Survey/Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (SF-36/PedsQL)

NCT ID: NCT02793973 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Leg Length Discrepancy, Shoe Lifts

The Development and Clinical Verification of Intelligent Rehabilitation System for Leg Length Discrepancy Patients

Start date: May 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

A structural leg length discrepancy (SLLD) is a common clinical problem. Its prevalence has been estimated at 40-70%. Those who have been suffered from limping for a long time may lead to follow-up low back pain and lower limb musculoskeletal disorders. Although lower limb triple view of x-ray is considered to be the current technique for determining LLD, it is costly and time consuming that not every hospital can afford it, and in case of radiograph, the patient is exposed to radiation. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a rapid clinical assessment method by gathering exterior parameters to build up a Regression model for measuring the discrepancy and determining LLD accurately. While using shoe lifts to correct discrepancy is the easiest conservative intervention for LLD, there are still many controversies on how much height should be added clinically and academically. The optimal height should be added depends on feedbacks from users and gait performance. The best gait performance can be measured from kinematic performance of center mass of body during walking. Therefore, this project wants to compare treatment responses between two kinds of shoe lift height correction methods for LLD: given 80% discrepancy in shoe lift height correction through triple view of x-ray and given optimal shoe lift height correction through analyzing kinematic performance of center mass of body.