Iron Fortification Trail Using NaFeEDTA in Iron Deficient Lead-exposed Children

Iron Deficiency Clinical Trial

Official title: Interactions of Lead Intoxication and Iron Deficiency in Morocco: The Effects of Iron Fortification With and Without NaEDTA on Lead Burden, Iron Status and Cognition in Children

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

In a cross-sectional study allotted by the ethical committee of the ETH Zurich, we are investigating the extent of anemia, iron deficiency and lead intoxication in young children. For this purpose an assessment of body lead burden and iron status was conducted in a cohort of individuals residing in areas of presumed high lead exposure. Associations between lead burden and iron status will be investigated in the near future (current status of the study).

In a follow-on intervention study, the effect of iron fortification with and without NaEDTA on blood lead levels in lead-exposed children will be evaluated; and the relative impact of these two strategies on child growth, motor and cognitive test performance will be compared.

This study will investigate the potential use of iron fortification to not only combat anemia but also reduce body lead burden in lead-exposed populations; it specifically investigates whether iron fortification with NaFeEDTA could have additional beneficial effects to iron alone.

Clinical Trial Description

Introduction Coexisting chronic lead poisoning and iron deficiency anemia (IDA) are common in urban areas in developing regions, particularly in young children. In urban Morocco, anemia affects more than 1/3rd of schoolchildren and lead exposure is high. Lead poisoning and IDA both impair cognitive development and educability and may therefore have substantial health, social and economic costs on developing countries.

Iron status alters susceptibility to gastrointestinal lead exposure; absorption of lead is sharply increased in children with IDA. IDA upregulates the divalent metal transporter trans-port protein (DMT-1) and increases lead absorption. Thus, iron fortification to reduce IDA may also reduce lead absorption and be an effective strategy to accompany environmental lead abatement. The optimal iron compound for wheat flour is currently debated, and although elemental iron compounds are commonly used, they may be only poorly absorbed in the face of inhibitory compounds found in wheat flour.

A form of chelated iron, NaFeEDTA, is a promising iron fortificant that is recommended for wheat flour fortification. It is also a lead chelator. It may be superior to other iron fortificants in its ability to reduce body lead burden, due to:

1. its iron is highly bioavailable in the face of dietary inhibitors (such as phytic acid in wheat flour); and

2. potentially, its ability to chelate lead in the gut and bloodstream. Thus, it may be a good choice for fortification of wheat flour in Morocco, particularly in urban areas, to both reduce IDA and lower body lead.

Study aims and objectives:

1. Assessment of body lead burden and iron status in a cohort of individuals residing in areas of presumed high lead exposure. Investigation of associations between lead burden and iron status.

2. Comparison of effect of iron fortification with and without NaEDTA on body lead and iron status in lead-exposed children; and the relative impact on cognition.

Study hypotheses:

The prevalence of iron deficiency and elevated blood lead will be high in children in this region.

2) Body lead burden, as assessed by blood lead levels and urinary lead and delta-aminolevulinic acid (ALA), will be higher in individuals with poorer iron status.

3) Poor iron status will be associated with low intakes of bioavailable iron. 4) Greater severity of iron deficiency and/or higher body lead in children will predict poorer performance on cognitive and motor tests, and these conditions will interact to predict poorer performance.

Study design:

Our studies will be carried out in one of the four sub-economic areas, that were previously used in the baseline assessment in and near Marrakesh, Morocco (exact site still needs to be determined according to extend of lead contamination on the level of human population). Body lead burden and iron status will be determined, and associations between these examined using a cross-sectional design. For this purpose, blood and urine samples will be collected from two groups (preschool and school-aged children), residing in an area of high lead exposure.

Study design:

An 8-month intervention study in iron deficient, lead-exposed school children (n=500) will be designed to investigate whether iron fortification to reduce IDA may also reduce lead absorption and be an effective strategy to accompany environmental lead abatement.

For this purpose these children will be divided into four groups to receive a daily fortified baked snack containing either: 1) 66.4 mg NaFeEDTA ; 2) 52.2 mg Na2EDTA dehydrate; 3) 27.1 mg FeSO4 ; or 4) no fortificants. ;

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Health Services Research

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Anemia, Iron-Deficiency
• Iron Deficiency
• Lead Poisoning
• Poisoning

• NCT number: NCT01573013
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: September 2011
• Completion date: June 2012