Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06342518
Other study ID # MU ESWT
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date December 1, 2020
Est. completion date December 1, 2021

Study information

Verified date March 2024
Source Istanbul Medeniyet University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aimed to check and compare how well shock wave therapy works for tennis elbow, both in terms of symptoms and what we can see on ultrasound.


Description:

42 patients with tennis elbow were split into two groups by chance: one group received shock wave therapy (ESWT), while the other received a fake treatment (Sham-ESWT) for comparison. Both groups underwent wrist exercises, splint usage, and ice application. Grip strength, pain levels, and how well they could move their wrist (functionality) were measured before, after, and one month post-treatment using tests. Additionally, the thickness of a common extensor tendon (CET) was evaluated using ultrasound. The patient, the doctor checking the patient, and the doctor doing the ultrasound didn't know which group the patient was in.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 42
Est. completion date December 1, 2021
Est. primary completion date September 1, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 60 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - experiencing pain and tenderness in the lateral epicondyle while extending their wrist and fingers against resistance for at least 3 months Exclusion Criteria: - Patients who are pregnant or have a coagulation disorder, cervical radiculopathy, peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vasculopathy in the upper extremity, complex regional pain syndrome, local infections, systemic inflammatory disease, fibromyalgia syndrome, arthritis (including rheumatoid arthritis, spondylarthritis, and crystal-induced arthropathies), malignancy, or those who have been treated with corticosteroids, PRP, or autologous blood injection, as well as those who have received physical therapy agents, undergone upper-extremity surgical interventions, or have a history of direct trauma to the elbow or a history of fracture,

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT)
The ESWT group received radial ESWT each session with a total of 2000 pulses at a frequency of 10 Hz. A gel was used at the interface, and the air pressure was set at 1.8 bar per session.
Sham ESWT
The Sham-ESWT group received Sham radial ESWT each session, but without actual contact of the applicator. To enhance the illusion of treatment, gel was applied, and the device emitted sound at every shock
Behavioral:
Resting Splint , Exercises and ice
Ensuring proper usage of the wrist resting splint by the patient was confirmed during follow-up visits. The physician instructed the patients on stretching and strengthening exercises for wrist extensors, which they were asked to perform three times a day. Application of ice for 20 minutes every 3-4 hours during painful periods was recommended. During follow-up visits patients confirmed that they adherence to exercises and recommendations.

Locations

Country Name City State
Turkey Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department Istanbul

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Istanbul Medeniyet University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Hand Grip Strength measured using the Jamar hand dynamometer Baseline, post-treatment(4th week), and one-month post-treatment (8th week)
Primary Pain severity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) which was scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extremely severe). Baseline, post-treatment(4th week), and one-month post-treatment (8th week)
Primary Functionality the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE)
The PRTEE allows patients to rate their levels of tennis elbow pain and disability from 0 to 10, and consists of 2 subscales:
PAIN subscale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable) Pain - 5 items
FUNCTION subscale (0 = no difficulty, 10 = unable to do) Specific activities - 6 items Usual activities - 4 items In addition to the individual subscale scores, a total score can be computed on a scale of 100 (0 = no disability).
Pain Score = Sum of the 5 pain items(out of 50) Best Score = 0, Worst Score =50 Function Score = Sum of the 10 function items, Divided by 2 (out of 50) Best Score = 0, Worst Score = 50
Computing the Total Score Total Score = Sum of pain + function scores Best Score = 0, Worst Score = 50 Best Score = 0, Worst Score = 100
Baseline, post-treatment(4th week), and one-month post-treatment (8th week)
Primary Quality of life score Short Form-12 (SF-12), Patients are provided with the SF-12 questionnaire, which consists of 12 questions covering physical and mental health domains.
The scoring yields two summary measures: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS).
PCS mean score: 56,5 MSC mean score: 60.7 Scores above mean indicate a better-than-average health-related quality of life, while scores below mean suggest below-average health.
Baseline, post-treatment(4th week), and one-month post-treatment (8th week)
Primary deep muscular tissue sensitivity pain pressure threshold (PPT) Pain pressure threshold (PPT) is used to measure deep muscular tissue sensitivity. The test determines the amount of pressure over a given area in which a steadily increasing nonpainful pressure stimulus turns into a painful pressure sensation. A varying pressure is applied from 0.5 to 1 kg/sec in a perpendicular direction relative to the muscle. Baseline, post-treatment(4th week), and one-month post-treatment (8th week)
Primary thickness of the common extensor tendon (CET) During ultrasonography for LE, the elbow is positioned in 90 degrees of flexion and the wrist in pronation. The ultrasound probe is placed longitudinally on the radial surface of the elbow. And common extensor tendon thickness was measured sonographically. Baseline, post-treatment(4th week), and one-month post-treatment (8th week)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT02308514 - Does Adding Cryostimulation to Conservative Care Help in Managing Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis? a Pilote Study N/A
Completed NCT02596659 - Effectiveness of Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Tennis Elbow N/A
Completed NCT00674622 - Prolotherapy for the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT06206109 - The Effect of Tendon Tears on Lateral Epicondylitis
Completed NCT06301152 - Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment High Intensive Laser Therapy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04382144 - Levobupivacaine Versus Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel®) for Treatment of Pain and Disability in Lateral Epicondylitis Phase 4
Recruiting NCT03863847 - A Neurofeedback Treatment for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT05648032 - PLT and Steroid in Lateral Epicondylopathy and Supraspinatus Calcific Tendinopathy Phase 3
Completed NCT06300749 - Effectiveness of Chiropractic Cervical Manipulation in Lateral Epicondylitis N/A
Completed NCT00794976 - Dexamethasone Iontophoretic Patch for the Treatment of Pain Associated With Lateral Epicondylitis Phase 2
Completed NCT00888225 - Tennis Elbow Trial N/A
Completed NCT06087081 - Mills Manipulation and Mulligan PRP Affect Pain, Grip Strength and Function on Lateral Epicondylitis N/A
Completed NCT05602571 - The Effectiveness of the Combination of PRP and ESWT in Lateral Epicondylitis N/A
Completed NCT05566418 - Immediate and Longterm Effects of Mulligan Mobilization With and Without Myofascial Release on Pain,Grip Strength and Function in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03279796 - Treatment of Tendon Disease Using Autologous Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Phase 2
Completed NCT04687943 - Comparison of PELOID Therapy and Kinesio Tape Effectiveness in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis
Recruiting NCT05947968 - Scapular PNF Versus Shoulder Strengthening Exercises in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis. N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06438328 - Effectiveness of Scapular Muscle Training in Improving Grip Strength Among Lateral Epicondylitis Patients N/A
Completed NCT06317545 - Effects of Nerchal Exercises on Lateral Epicondylitis. N/A
Completed NCT05070559 - Active Release Technique and Graston Technique in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis N/A