View clinical trials related to Laser Burn.
Filter by:Timely and accurate estimation of the surface area and depth of a burn injury is essential for determining an appropriate treatment modality. Inappropriate or inadequate treatment may result in complications and increased societal costs. Burn depth is determined by subjective assessing the characteristics of burn injury. Some objective methods are available (e.g., biopsy and histology, thermography and laser doppler imaging), but these are cumbersome. In assessing burn wounds, laser Doppler imaging (LDI) which has a good correlation with histology, is currently the most widely used and validated noninvasive measurement tool. In addition, it is the only technique that has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, the use of LDI is accompanied by some disadvantages. The current commercial available LDI device is rather costly, cumbersome and has a poor spatial resolution. Another laser-based technique, laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI), works with a similar principle and might become an alternative for LDI. LSCI has some advantages over LDI such as higher spatial resolution, much easier to position, no valuable time wasted on setting up the instrument, easy to take several images of burns that have a large surface area and/or much curvature, faster measurements, fraction of the time needed for getting a high-quality measurement, able to follow changes in the perfusion in real time. In contrast to the LDI, the LSCI has not been validated in terms of a diagnostic tool for stratifying the severity of a burn (based on LDI color coding). Consequently, we will compare the LSCI with LDI to improve burn care by providing cheaper, faster and higher resolution imaging technique.
Female patients with either stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or vaginal wall weakness and prolapse will be evaluated for vaginal elasticity using vaginal tactile imaging both before and after Carbon Dioxide laser treatment.