Laryngeal Masks Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of the Air-Q® Self-Pressurizing (SP) Intubating Laryngeal Airway With the Air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway and I-gel for Airway Maintenance in Adults Under General Anesthesia
The air-Q Self-Pressurizing Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA SP) is a modification of the air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA). Besides the i-gel, it is the only breathing tube that sits above the vocal cords that does not require inflation of a cuff with air. The purpose of this study is to compare the ability of the aILA-SP to maintain patency of a patient's airway during general anesthesia with that of the aILA and i-gel devices. As a measure of this ability, we hypothesized that the airway sealing pressures will be equal between the aILA-SP and aILA, but superior when comparing the aILA-SP to the i-gel (i-gel will be lower).
Laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) are a group of airway devices, alternatively referred to as
supraglottic airways (SGAs), used in anesthesia that are positioned in the back of the
throat (pharynx) above (supra) the glottis (windpipe opening) and the vocal cords. This is
in contradistinction to a tracheal tube, which is an airway device that is placed through
the vocal cords and extends to a position below the glottis (infraglottic) and resides in
the trachea (windpipe). Since their first approval for use in the United States by the US
Food and Drug Administration in the early 1990s, the application of SGAs has become more
widespread. Initially, they were only used in anesthetized patients who were breathing on
their own (i.e., spontaneously ventilating). This was, in large part, due to a relatively
low airway seal pressure, the pressure with which the device seals against the throat,
thereby, keeping the air pushed in by a breathing machine (ventilator) from getting into the
stomach or leaking out around the device and out through the mouth - in either case, not
going into the patient's lungs. The relatively low airway seal pressure (18 - 20 cmH2O) did
not allow for the use of muscle relaxant (paralyzing) drugs and positive pressure
ventilation. Successive generations of SGAs by a variety of manufacturers have overcome and
continue to attempt to overcome limitations of earlier devices. In addition, accumulated
clinical experience has made anesthesia providers more comfortable with their use. No SGA,
however, is yet ideal, and incremental changes continue to appear to improve airway
management and reduce airway morbidity (e.g., sore throat, jaw pain, etc.).
The air-Q® Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA, Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL) is a newer,
commercially-available, SGA designed for use as a primary airway and as an intubation
conduit. It is available in polyvinyl chloride (PVC)-based, single use and silicone-based,
reusable models. Information on its safety and effectiveness from a randomized, controlled
trial in adults, undergoing general anesthesia, compared to that of the silicone-based,
reusable aILA versus the LMA-Prosealâ„¢ (pLMA, North America, San Diego, CA), the current
"gold standard" for SGA airway seal pressure, is available.
The air-Q® Self-Pressurizing (SP) Intubating Laryngeal Airway (aILA-SP, Mercury Medical,
Clearwater, FL) is a commercially-available, modification of the silicone-based, reusable
aILA. Its overall design is identical to the aILA, but incorporates a communication orifice
between the air tube and cuff, which regulates airflow into and from the cuff during periods
of positive pressure and spontaneous ventilation. As such, it incorporates a
self-pressurizing cuff that does not require manual inflation. Such a cuff may be
advantageous insofar as it dynamically adjusts its intra-cuff pressure and fit with the
patient's pharyngeal and periglottic anatomy, which may lead to a reduction in airway
morbidity, while still providing the high seal pressure afforded by the aILA design.
Lastly, the i-gel (Intersurgical Inc., Liverpool, NY) is a commercially-available SGA that
uses a thermoplastic elastomer to create a non-inflating, anatomically-conforming,
periglottic cuff. Studies have shown it to be an easily inserted, effective airway device
with a lower incidence of sore throat and neck complaints. With exception to the aILA-SP, it
is the only other commercially-available SGA that does not require cuff inflation.
To date, no reports are available on the clinical performance of the aILA-SP in relation to
other SGAs. Thus, the primary purpose of this study is to compare the airway seal pressure
(ASP) of the aILA-SP against the aILA and i-gel in adults undergoing general anesthesia.
Airway seal pressure is the most common surrogate for ventilatory capacity used in SGA
studies.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03619057 -
Voice Tessitura and Size of the Required Laryngeal Mask
|
||
Completed |
NCT04206592 -
Comparison of the Ambu AuraGain and Intersurgical i-Gel Laryngeal Masks in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03725540 -
Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure Monitoring Using Baska Versus I-gel Laryngeal Mask Airway
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03528590 -
Ventilation Efficacy of Size 3 or Size 4 I-gel in Female Patient Weighing 50 to 60 Kilograms
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03118596 -
Fibre-optic Guided Tracheal Intubation Through SADs
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03139292 -
Comparative Evaluation of Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask and Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02938039 -
I-Gel vs Ambu Laryngeal Mask Airways in Infants and Children Undergoing Surgical Procedures
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04872881 -
Comparison of Effectiveness of Different Airway Management Methods During Percutaneous Tracheostomy
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03852589 -
The Effect of Placement of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway With C-Mac Videolaryngoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02816463 -
RCT:Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP) - Ambu AuraGain vs LMA Supreme
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03140228 -
Postoperative Sore Throat in Children: Comparison Between Two Supraglottic Devices, Ambu® AuraOnceâ„¢ Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) and I-Gel®.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03247803 -
Air-Q® SP Versus Williams Intubating Airway for Single-Operator FOI
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03257800 -
Laryngeal Mask Insertion Conditions And Hemodynamic Effects
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03502590 -
IGEL Laryngeal Mask Airway Device Effectiveness in Irradiated Necks
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01704118 -
Comparison of Size 1 I-gel and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02618525 -
Supraorbital Pressure Versus Jaw Thrust for Assessing the Adequate Depth of Anesthesia for LMA Insertion in Children
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04229862 -
Effect of Head Elevation on LMA Insertion
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03931122 -
Comparison of Weight-based Versus External Ear-size Based Technique for Selection of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Pediatric Surgical Patients.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03006250 -
The Effect of Desflurane vs Sevoflurane on Perioperative Respiratory Complications in Laryngeal Mask Airway Anesthesia
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03028896 -
90° Rotation Technique for LMA FlexibleTM Insertion
|
N/A |