Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04672421 |
Other study ID # |
UMT2009-SP-ASMC-0301 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
April 18, 2011 |
Est. completion date |
May 9, 2012 |
Study information
Verified date |
September 2021 |
Source |
Shin Poong Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of MEDICURTAIN. Patients who
underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomly assigned either into Medicurtain®
treatment group or non-treatment control group. Adhesion formations at 8 weeks after the
index surgery were compared between the two groups by using the well-defined grade scale and
image recording.
Description:
This study was designed as multi-center, randomized, evaluator-blinded, comparative study.
Subjects were woman between 20~80 years of age reserved with total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Subject screening was conducted for the subject who signed an informed consent form. Subjects
who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned into either treatment (Medicurtain®) or
control group.
Each subject visit clinic for follow-up examination 1week (Visit 2) and 8 weeks (Visit 3)
after the index surgery and before the visit subjects were received phone calls. Since the
target population was the patient who scheduled elective total laparoscopic hysterectomy,
subjects who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria after the examination for the surgery
signed on the informed consent at Visit 1 (Baseline: 0 day) and randomly assigned either into
the treatment and control group.
At visit 2 (1week±2days), 1week after the index surgery adverse events and general health
were examined. At visit 3 (8week±5days), 8 weeks after the index surgery, the investigator
inserted endoscope into abdominal cavity and took video clip and still images. If it was
necessary, adhesion was removed surgically. An independent evaluator evaluated the records
and graded the adhesion rate and its severity according to the grading system. If it was
difficult to collect images with endoscope, the investigators recorded his observation for
statistical analysis.
The investigator inserted endoscope into abdominal cavity and took video clip and still
images at 8weeks after total laparoscopic hysterectomy to evaluate the adhesion formation and
its grade. An independent evaluator evaluated the records and graded the adhesion rate and
its severity according to the grading system. If it was difficult to collect images with
endoscope, the investigators recorded his observation for statistical analysis. The adhesion
grading system was proposed by American Fertility Society (AFS) in 1988, grades adhesion with
Grade 0, Grade 1, Grade2 and Grade 3. Grade 0 means there is no adhesion formation, Grade
1~Grade 3 means there is adhesion formed, severity increases with the grade. Adhesion rate
and grade were evaluated between the treatment and control groups suing Grade 0~3 scales.
General safety of the study device was evaluated based on the adverse event rate, laboratory
tests, ECG test. The laboratory tests were conducted before and after the index surgery to
evaluate whether the device cause toxicity such as hepatic and renal toxicity for safety
evaluation.