Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Pilot Study Evaluating the Feasibility and Usability of the LaparoGuard System During Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures
Verified date | March 2023 |
Source | Mariner Endosurgery |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
LaparoGuard is intended as an adjunctive safety system for laparoscopic surgery. The system allows surgeons to virtually annotate a safe anatomical volume inside the body cavity of the patient during a laparoscopic surgery. The surgeon then receives notification throughout the procedure whenever a tracked rigid instrument has exited that volume. This open label, prospective, feasibility, single site, multi-investigator trial will evaluate the feasibility and usability of the LaparoGuard system during laparoscopic surgical procedures.
Status | Enrolling by invitation |
Enrollment | 60 |
Est. completion date | October 30, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | September 30, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patients undergoing routine laparoscopic procedures. Examples include (non-exhaustive): operative laparoscopy, appendectomy, cholecystectomy, colon resection, inguinal or diaphragmatic hernia repairs. - Ability to read and understand English - Consent to use of the LaparoGuard system in their procedure (18 yrs or older) Exclusion Criteria: - Unwilling to sign informed consent - Simple diagnostic laparoscopy (can be included if conversion to operative laparoscopy) - Surgeries which require conversion to laparotomy for patient safety reasons |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Hamilton General Hospital | Hamilton | Ontario |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Mariner Endosurgery | Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (FedDev Ontario), Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation |
Canada,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Procedural Success | For each surgical procedure conducted, the case will be defined as a technical success if: the surgical team is able to complete the procedure without needing to turn off the LaparoGuard system. Failure will be if the operator deems it necessary to stop utilizing the LaparoGuard system and resort to the standard (non-annotated) endoscopic camera feed. Potential reasons for doing so may be device reporting errors, such as the LaparoGuard system consistently incorrectly reporting that a surgical tool has exited the safe zone.
In emergency situations, such as changes in medical condition unrelated to use of the LaparoGuard system, the operator may also deem it necessary to resort to the standard-of-care; however, these situations will not be judged as failures and the case data will be utilized for study purposes up until that point. |
Intraoperative | |
Secondary | Pre-operative LaparoGuard system setup time | The amount of time taken to setup the LaparoGuard system by the surgical nurses will be recorded | Baseline | |
Secondary | Usability reported pre-operatively by nurses | Following setup of the LaparoGuard system preoperatively, but prior to bringing the patient into the surgical suite, study staff will conduct a short interview with the surgical nurses to evaluate their comfort and ease with the system setup procedures. If any use errors or confusion were observed by the study staff, these shall be discussed in depth. Comments reported by the nurses on difficulties encountered and potential simplifications to the procedures will be recorded. | Baseline | |
Secondary | Safe zone deviations | The total number of safe zone deviations as well the total time each instrument was outside the safe zone will be tracked and evaluated. | Intraoperative | |
Secondary | Usability reported post-operatively by surgical team | Following completion of each surgical procedure, study staff will conduct a short interview with the surgical team to evaluate the ability of the team to interpret the LaparoGuard output, the safe zone and respond to any information provided by system. | Intraoperative | |
Secondary | Clinical utility reported by expert surgeons | Following the completion of all 10 cases, study staff will conduct interviews with the expert surgeons to evaluate their perceived clinical utility of the LaparoGuard system. A qualitative discussion will held around the particular clinical situations in which LaparoGuard may be most useful. Study staff will also record any potential insights by the surgeons on future features which may be incorporated to improve the clinical utility of LaparoGuard. | 2 months | |
Secondary | Training utility reported by novice and expert surgeons | Following the completion of all 10 cases, study staff will conduct interviews with the expert and novice surgeons to evaluate their perceived training utility of the LaparoGuard system. Quantitative rating scales will be used and qualitative discussion will held around the particular training situations in which LaparoGuard may be most useful. Study staff will also record any potential insights by the expert or novice surgeons on future features which may be incorporated to improve the training utility of LaparoGuard. | 2 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03704259 -
Nano-Ceramic Coating for Laparoscope Lens
|
||
Completed |
NCT02320578 -
2D Versus 3D Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: a Prospective Randomized Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02756052 -
Enhancing Laparoscopic Skill Acquisition and Retention With Transcranial Direct-current Stimulation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02417857 -
Comparison of Single İncision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00433316 -
Pain Relief by Intra-Peritoneal Ropivacaine During Gynecological Laparoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00280553 -
A Pilot Study of Bupivacaine Infusion in Abdominal Surgery
|
Phase 2 |