The Use of Tidal Volume Challenge of Dynamic Parameters During

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Laparoscopy is increasingly used for major abdominal and pelvic surgery. As this approach is also recommended in elderly patients with serious comorbidities, optimal fluid therapy guidance during this procedure is important.

Many studies have reported that less invasive dynamic indices such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV), which are derived from the arterial pressure waveform, are superior to static indices to predict fluid responsiveness. PPV and SVV are based on the heart-lung interaction and reflect cyclic changes in stroke volume induced by mechanical ventilation in the closed-chest condition. Therefore, their ability to predict fluid responsiveness can be affected by factors that influence the arterial tone or the compliance of the respiratory system.

Laparoscopic surgery for the abdominal visceral organs requires pneumoperitoneum and the Trendelenburg position to optimize surgical conditions, and can reduce cardiac output and respiratory compliance. Accordingly, the usefulness of PPV and SVV in predicting fluid responsiveness during laparoscopic surgery under these conditions may be questioned.

It has been clearly shown that the values of dynamic parameters are significantly correlated with the magnitude of VT. Min et al. reported that augmentation of PPV and SVV via a temporary increase in VT from 8 to 12 ml/kg improved their predictive power in the inconclusive zone with respect to fluid responsiveness (PPV values of 9% and 13%, respectively). Another recent study reported that on increasing VT from 6 to 8 ml/kg, augmented PPV and SVV, as well as their absolute changes, predicted fluid responsiveness with high sensitivity and specificity, even in critically ill patients receiving low VT.

Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate whether increasing VT from 6 to 8 ml/kg would improve the predictive power of PPV and SVV in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position under lung-protective ventilation. We also assessed the ability of absolute changes in PPV and SVV values induced by a temporary increase in VT from 6 to 8 ml/kg to predict fluid responsiveness.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Laparoscopic Surgery

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT03467711
Study type	Observational
Source	Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase
Start date	March 16, 2018
Completion date	May 1, 2018

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT01114971` - Labetalol and Esmolol: Vital Signs and Post Operative Pain Management	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT05624346` - The Effect of Respiratory Exercise After Laparoscopic Surgery	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04999696` - Minimally Invasive Therapy Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Management of Early Stage Cervical Cancer	N/A
Completed	`NCT01084200` - Comparison of Sevoflurane, Propofol, and Sevoflurane Plus Propofol for Maintenance of Anaesthesia	Phase 4
Not yet recruiting	`NCT00731107` - XCEL Bladeless Trocar Versus Veress Needle: A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing These Two Entry Techniques in Gynaecological Laparoscopic Surgery.	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06050161` - Evaluating Artisential Laparoscopic Instruments in Gynecologic Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05005117` - Laparoscopic Approach for Emergency Colon Resection	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05436899` - A Pilot Study on Training Simulator Efficacy	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05542823` - Effect of Cuff Pressure of Endotracheal Tube on POST
Terminated	`NCT03684304` - The Effect of Abdominal Binder Use on Postoperative Pain and Mobility in Patients Undergoing Pelvic Surgery	N/A
Completed	`NCT04146090` - Low-pressure vs Standard-pressure in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy	N/A
Terminated	`NCT01436032` - Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability Study of N1539 in Subjects After Abdominal Laparoscopic Surgery	Phase 3
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05109130` - Change of Circulating Tumor Cells During Laparoscopic or Transanal Endoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.
Completed	`NCT04642118` - Low-pressure Pulmonary Recruitment Maneuver to Decrease Post-laparoscopic Shoulder Pain in Gynecologic Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06150079` - Individualized PEEP Titration on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications	N/A
Completed	`NCT05121454` - Validation of Serenno CUO and IAP Measuring Device
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05092425` - Analysis of Risk Factors for Children With Heterochronous Indirect Hernia
Recruiting	`NCT03318185` - Gasless Single-port Laparoscopic-assisted Radical Resection for Rectal Carcinoma	N/A
Completed	`NCT03506555` - Laparoscopic Access in General Surgery: the Closed (Veress Needle) Technique Versus the Open (Hasson) Technique	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06338865` - Short Title: Standard vs. Lower Pressure Pneumoperitoneum	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

The Use of Tidal Volume Challenge of Dynamic Parameters During Laparoscopic Surgery

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms