Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06395922
Other study ID # 36264PR526/2/24
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date February 6, 2024
Est. completion date June 1, 2024

Study information

Verified date May 2024
Source Tanta University
Contact Rabab M Mohamed, MD
Phone 00201069122935
Email rabmoh_30@outlook.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aimed to compare the performance and safety profiles of two supraglottic airway devices (SADs), the Blockbuster laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and the Baska Mask (BM), in patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).


Description:

Laparoscopic surgery has become increasingly prevalent across numerous surgical disciplines due to the well-established benefits it offers over traditional open procedures. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the surgical removal of the gallbladder, stands out as one of the most frequently performed laparoscopic operations worldwide. Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) play a crucial role in airway management algorithms, serving as viable alternatives in both anticipated and unanticipated difficult airway situations. The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) can be utilized to establish a routine airway during general anesthesia or, less frequently, as a conduit for tracheal intubation. Newer, improved LMA designs incorporate cuffs that provide higher sealing pressures than classic LMAs, while also allowing for the venting of gastric contents through a dedicated drain tube. The Baska Mask (BM), a second-generation SAD, features a non-inflatable cuff that is continuous with the airway channel, thereby inflating with positive pressure ventilation to improve cuff seal.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 140
Est. completion date June 1, 2024
Est. primary completion date June 1, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 60 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Aged 18-60 years - Both sexes. - American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II. - Scheduled for elective LC under general anesthesia. Exclusion Criteria: - Anticipated difficult airway. - Renal dysfunction. - Hiatus hernia. - Obesity. - Pregnancy. - Patients taking rate-controlling medications, steroids, opioids, or regular antacids.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Blockbuster LMA
The LMA was inserted using the recommended technique, with the patient's head in the sniffing position. The appropriate size was selected based on body weight (size 3 for 30-50 kg, size 4 for 50-70 kg)
Baska Mask
The BM was inserted by opening the mouth, avoiding the tongue, and negotiating the palatopharyngeal curve using the hand-tab.

Locations

Country Name City State
Egypt Tanta University Tanta El-Gharbia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Tanta University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Oropharyngeal leak pressure Oropharyngeal leak pressure was measured Just after insertion and 30 min after insertion. 30 min after insertion
Secondary Device insertion time The time from start of insertion till successful insertion. 5 min after insertion
Secondary The incidence of successful gastric tube placement The incidence of successful gastric tube placement through the device. 10 min after insertion
Secondary Complications Complications such as including pain in the throat, difficulty in swallowing, cough, and blood on the device were measured. 24 hours postoperatively
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03670849 - Image Fusion in the OR N/A
Withdrawn NCT04561583 - Effectiveness and Safety of LED Light Source System for Endoscope N/A
Completed NCT00872287 - Pain in Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery Cholecystectomy Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06017167 - Prophylaxis Against Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Phase 2
Completed NCT05536557 - Bilateral External Oblique Ä°ntercostal (EOI) Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. N/A
Recruiting NCT05794503 - Postoperative Urinary Retention After Reversal of Neuromuscular Block by Neostigmine Versus Sugammadex Early Phase 1
Completed NCT05998317 - Dexamethasone at Night vs at Induction on PONV After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT04759079 - The Effects of Acupuncture Against Postoperative Nausea and Vomit After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Recruiting NCT04138472 - Comparison Of Dexmedetomidine, Fentanyl And Lignocaine In Attenuation Of Hemodynamic Response To Direct Laryngoscopy And Intubation In Patient Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Recruiting NCT06022926 - Investigation of the Intraoperative and Postoperative Effects of Warming Patients in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Completed NCT02469831 - Respiratory Mechanics and Metabolic Changes During Low Pressure Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Phase 2
Completed NCT03067038 - Single Incision Versus Three Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Completed NCT00886210 - Clinical Impact of Routine Abdominal Drainage After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Completed NCT00292214 - Comparing Intravenous and Oral Paracetamol for Cholecystectomy Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05533580 - Differential Effects of Remimazolam and Propofol on Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation During General Anesthesia N/A
Recruiting NCT05533567 - Electroencephalographic Profiles During General Anesthesia: a Comparative Study of Remimazolam and Propofol N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05636475 - The Effect Of Machine-Based And Manually Applied Hand Massage On Pain, Anxiety And Gastrointestinal System Functions After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT05094193 - Trocar-site Infiltration Versus TAP-block N/A
Completed NCT03323684 - Quadratus Lumborum Block vs Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Post-cholecystectomy Analgesia N/A
Recruiting NCT04162106 - Feasibility of the Ultravision™ System in Low Pressure Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared to Airseal® IFS N/A