Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment method in symptomatic gallstone disease. However, complications that develop due to being a technical procedure tend to be more complex and more morbid-estimating how difficult the surgery will be before the operation will enable us to be more prepared both in terms of patient counseling and surgical team selection. Such a prediction will minimize the risk of complications and morbidity. In our study, investigators used the scoring system "How to predict difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Proposal for a simple preoperative scoring system?" which was published in "The American Journal of Surgery" in November 2016. Investigators wanted to evaluate prospectively adequate "Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Difficulty Score," which was developed retrospectively, in determining the surgical difficulty preoperatively.


Clinical Trial Description

ETHICAL BOARD APPROVAL Konya Chamber of Commerce Education and Health Foundation was found ethically appropriate for the study according to the decision of Karatay University Ethical Board Presidency dated 18.06.2019 and numbered 2019/0051. FEATURES OF THE STUDY AND SELECTION OF PATIENTS Patients who were to be operated due to symptomatic cholelithiasis between 01.03.2020 and 31.07.2020 at the Health Sciences University (SBU) Konya Training and Research Hospital (KEAH) were included in the study. The study was done prospectively. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Difficulty Score (DSLC) developed in the reference study will be used. The sex of the patients and whether they had an attack of cholecystitis will be recorded. Neutrophil count, fibrinogen, and ALP levels will be recorded from preoperatively routine blood tests. DSLC score will be calculated before the patient goes into surgery. How successful the scoring system is in determining the difficulty of the operation in the postoperative period will be analyzed statistically. Thirteen surgeons will be included in the study. Based on the last ten surgery times, where each surgeon has no problems and has no technical difficulties, the average operation time will be calculated for each surgeon individually. In the reference study, it has been accepted that the surgeon's duration is more than 1.5 times or challenging to undergo open surgery. In our study, it will be considered as a difficult operation to exceed or exceed 1.5 times the surgeon's duration. Other than that, it will be considered a smooth operation. The biliary tract injuries that occurred in exposed cases will be classified according to the Strasberg classification. In the reference study, statistically significant score groups were formed as low risk of 0 points, medium risk of 1-4 points, high risk of 5-9 points, and a very high risk of 10 points. In our study, these score groups will be created, and statistical analysis will be made. Also, ROC (Reciever Operator Characteristics Curve) curve will be created with the scores obtained from the scoring system, and the specificity and sensitivity of the scoring system will be statistically put. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04282759
Study type Observational
Source Konya Training and Research Hospital
Contact
Status Completed
Phase
Start date March 1, 2020
Completion date August 20, 2020

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03670849 - Image Fusion in the OR N/A
Withdrawn NCT04561583 - Effectiveness and Safety of LED Light Source System for Endoscope N/A
Completed NCT00872287 - Pain in Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery Cholecystectomy Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06017167 - Prophylaxis Against Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Phase 2
Completed NCT05536557 - Bilateral External Oblique Ä°ntercostal (EOI) Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. N/A
Recruiting NCT05794503 - Postoperative Urinary Retention After Reversal of Neuromuscular Block by Neostigmine Versus Sugammadex Early Phase 1
Completed NCT05998317 - Dexamethasone at Night vs at Induction on PONV After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT04759079 - The Effects of Acupuncture Against Postoperative Nausea and Vomit After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Recruiting NCT04138472 - Comparison Of Dexmedetomidine, Fentanyl And Lignocaine In Attenuation Of Hemodynamic Response To Direct Laryngoscopy And Intubation In Patient Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Recruiting NCT06022926 - Investigation of the Intraoperative and Postoperative Effects of Warming Patients in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Completed NCT03067038 - Single Incision Versus Three Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Completed NCT02469831 - Respiratory Mechanics and Metabolic Changes During Low Pressure Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Phase 2
Completed NCT00886210 - Clinical Impact of Routine Abdominal Drainage After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Completed NCT00292214 - Comparing Intravenous and Oral Paracetamol for Cholecystectomy Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05533567 - Electroencephalographic Profiles During General Anesthesia: a Comparative Study of Remimazolam and Propofol N/A
Recruiting NCT05533580 - Differential Effects of Remimazolam and Propofol on Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation During General Anesthesia N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05636475 - The Effect Of Machine-Based And Manually Applied Hand Massage On Pain, Anxiety And Gastrointestinal System Functions After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT05094193 - Trocar-site Infiltration Versus TAP-block N/A
Completed NCT03323684 - Quadratus Lumborum Block vs Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Post-cholecystectomy Analgesia N/A
Recruiting NCT04162106 - Feasibility of the Ultravision™ System in Low Pressure Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared to Airseal® IFS N/A