Language Delay Clinical Trial
Official title:
Identification of Hereditary Auditory Temporal Processing Deficits
Some children with certain language disorders may not properly process the sounds they hear,
resulting in language impairments. The purpose of this study is to determine if deficits in
auditory temporal processing the way the brain analyzes the timing and patterns of sounds are
an inherited trait.
Families with auditory temporal processing deficits are sought in order to identify the genes
responsible for auditory temporal processing deficits. Children and adults with a diagnosis
or history of language impairment in the family and their family members both affected and
non-affected are eligible for this two-part study. In Part 1, participants undergo a series
of language tests and listening tests to measure various characteristics of how they perceive
sound. In Part 2, they are interviewed about language disorders, learning disabilities, and
other medical problems of family members. This information is used to construct a pedigree
(family tree diagram) showing the pattern of inheritance of family traits. Study subjects
whose pedigree indicates that language disorders may be hereditary in their family will
provide either a small blood sample (1 to 2 tablespoons) or a tissue specimen obtained from a
cheek swab (rubbing the inside of the cheek with a small brush or cotton swabs). The sample
will be used to isolate DNA for genetic analysis.
Objective
Recent research implicates auditory processing deficits in the etiology of language
impairments, but no standard methodology has been employed to determine whether auditory
processing deficits are heritable traits. We will investigate whether auditory processing
skills and auditory processing disorders (APDs) are hereditary.
Study Population
We will study same-sex twins (healthy volunteers) and individuals who score in the top or
bottom 10th percentile on auditory processing tests and their first-degree family members.
Design: A Two-Phase, Staged Study
Our approach uses the two classical methods of demonstrating heritability: comparison of
monozygotic (MZ) to dizygotic (DZ) concordance rates in twins and measuring familial
aggregation of a trait. While there are a variety of auditory processing tests in common use,
there is no standard battery of tests for the diagnosis of APD.
Moreover, the normal variation in performance on many of these tests is not known. We will
systematically evaluate tests of auditory processing for variation in the general population
and for evidence of heritability.
Phase 1 Twin study
We will evaluate a variety of auditory processing tests in MZ and same-sex DZ twins. This
initial phase of the study is designed to provide data so that the performance of MZ twin
pairs can be compared to the performance of DZ twin pairs. Statistical modeling will be used
to estimate the relative contributions of heredity and environment to auditory processing
skills. In addition, we will examine variation in auditory processing skills in the general
population of twins. This will allow us to identify auditory processing skills and tests that
have the greatest heritable components, and to establish normative data for the tests we
administer.
Phase 2 Family aggregation study
Based on the outcomes of Phase 1, auditory processing tests of skills with the highest
heritable component will be selected for evaluation of probands. Those who score in the top
and bottom 10th percentile will be eligible for participation as probands in this phase of
the study. Variation of these skills in the general population, as determined by the twin
data (Phase 1) or published norms, when they are available, will be used to determine the top
and bottom 10th percentiles. This same test set will be administered to probands and at least
two first-degree relatives allowing us to determine whether traits related to auditory
processing occur within the family at a rate greater than chance.
Outcome Measures
Phase 1 outcome measures will be individual performance on tests of auditory processing
skills and comparative performance of MZ and DZ co-twin pairs on these tests. Phase II
outcome measures will be the performance on auditory processing measures of probands and
their family members, and affectance rates observed in these families.<TAB>
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00625261 -
Effectiveness of Early Parent-Based Language Intervention
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03379818 -
Vocabulary Intervention for Late Talkers
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05861531 -
Learning to Talk, Learning to Eat: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve NICU Oral Feeding and Language Outcomes
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03547492 -
Developmental Intervention for Infants of Adolescent Mothers
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04358484 -
Implementation of Incredible Years for Autism and Language Delay Program in Spain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06156865 -
Using Neuroimaging and Behavioral Assessments to Understand Late Talking
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06110884 -
Music Therapy for Speech and Prosody in Autistic Children (MTSPAC)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04252807 -
A Common Elements-based Intervention to Improve Maternal Psychological Well-being and Mother-infant Interaction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04255472 -
Effectiveness of the WHO Caregivers Skills Training Program
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04689282 -
Intranasal Inhalations of M2 Macrophage Soluble Factors in Children With Developmental Speech Disorders
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03688386 -
A Language Intervention Study of Preterm Infants
|
N/A |