Oral Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone For Induction Of Labour: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Labour Induction Clinical Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02168881
• Other study ID #: Misoprostol-2014
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• First received: June 19, 2014
• Last updated: June 19, 2014
• Start date: May 2014

Study information

• Verified date: June 2014
• Source: Ain Shams University
• Contact: Marwan Osama Elkady
• Phone: +201205533315
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Ain Shams University: Obstetrics and Gynecology department
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is to compare between oral misoprostol in solution and vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labour in primiparous women with singleton pregnancy as regards efficiency and safety to both mother and fetus.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 342
• Est. primary completion date: January 2016
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Female
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Primigravida

• >37 wks

Exclusion Criteria:

• Scarred uterus

• Macrosomia

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Labour Induction

Intervention

Drug:
• Misoprostol

• Dinoprostone

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Egypt	Ain Shams Maternity hospital	Cairo

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Ain Shams University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	induction delivery time		2 hourly	No