View clinical trials related to Labour Induction.
Filter by:Investigation the effect of timing of amniotomy (early versus delayed) after vaginal misoprostol in induced labor. Condition: induction of labour intervention: eary versus late amniotomy on labour induction after vaginal misoprostol Phase: Not applicable
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of the misoprostol vaginal insert (MVI) for labour induction using standard (MVI-24) and adjusted (MVI-10) criteria. Design: Non-interventional observational case control study. Setting: Tertiary-care academic centre in Germany. Population: A cohort of 138 pregnant women ≥ 37/0 weeks undergoing labour induction. Methods: Induction of labour with MVI in a consecutive series of women using standard (MVI-24, n = 69) or adjusted (MVI-10, n = 69) criteria. Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were the time from induction to delivery and the caesarean section rate. The secondary outcomes included the need for additional measures to induce labour, uterine tachysystole, tocolysis, fetal scalp blood testing, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, umbilical arterial pH, and Apgar score.
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of the misoprostol vaginal insert (MVI) with an off-label use of oral misoprostol (OM). Design: Pair-matched case-control study. Setting: Tertiary-care academic centre in Germany. Population: A cohort of 138 women ≥ 37/0 weeks pregnant undergoing labour induction. Methods: The induction of labour with a retrievable prostaglandin vaginal insert in a consecutive series of 69 women was compared with induction using oral misoprostol in a pair-matched cohort. Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were the time from induction to delivery and the caesarean section rate. Secondary outcomes included uterine tachysystole, tocolysis, fetal scalp blood testing, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, umbilical arterial pH, and Apgar score.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of vaginally administered misoprostol (Misodel) versus per orally administered misoprostol (Cytotec) in induction of labour in nulliparous women.
This study is to compare between oral misoprostol in solution and vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labour in primiparous women with singleton pregnancy as regards efficiency and safety to both mother and fetus.