Use of Standardized Algorithm for the Management of Epidural Analgesia for

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus (PIEB) has become a standard technique for labour analgesia in many departments of anesthesia. Advantages to the former standard of care, continued epidural infusion (CEI), include reduced analgesic consumption , better maternal satisfaction and less occurrence of motor block . At Mount Sinai Hospital, the introduction of a bundle of changes in the management of labor analgesia including the use of PIEB, has resulted in an improvement of the quality of labor analgesia. This bundle of changes included labor catheter placement more often at L2/L3 interspace, more frequent use of fentanyl in the epidural loading dose, the implementation of a PIEB regimen and an increase in hourly baseline offer of local anesthetic. A recent before-and-after study conducted by the investigators, comparing the current practice with the previous practice, which was based on CEI, identified that the incidence of women experiencing pain >3 (scale 0-10) (40% vs 30%) and the number of nurse-administered top-ups (24% vs 3%) were significantly reduced. However, despite that significant improvement, some 30% of women undergoing epidural analgesia still experience pain NRS >3 (NRS scale 0-10) during either first or second stage of labor. Although the health care team attempts to manage epidurals as standardized as possible, there is some variation in practice resulting from the many stakeholders involved in the labor analgesia management, including anesthesiologists, obstetricians, nurses and patients. The investigators hypothesized that our most recent results may be explained by the lack of standardization of the management of epidural analgesia and that a standardized epidural catheter placement and a management algorithm may improve the efficacy of our epidural analgesia regimen. The aim of this pilot study is to test the feasibility and efficacy of the use of a standardized algorithm for the management of labor epidural analgesia based on a PIEB regimen.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Labor Pain

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT04814199
Study type	Observational
Source	Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase
Start date	May 4, 2021
Completion date	October 29, 2021

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT03539562` - Therapeutic Rest to Delay Admission in Early Labor: A Prospective Study on Morphine Sleep
Withdrawn	`NCT04662450` - Evaluation and Management of Parturients' Pain Intensity	N/A
Completed	`NCT02885350` - Spinal or Epidural Fentanyl or Sufentanil for Labour Pain in Early Phase of the Labour	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT02550262` - Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Labor Analgesia During First Stage of Labor	N/A
Completed	`NCT01598506` - Intrathecal Hydromorphone for Labor Analgesia	Phase 2
Withdrawn	`NCT01636999` - Comparing Sedara to Butorphanol in Early Labor	N/A
Completed	`NCT00987441` - Epidural Labor Analgesia and Infant Neurobehavior	N/A
Completed	`NCT00755092` - Effect of Doula in Nulliparas and Multiparas	N/A
Terminated	`NCT00787176` - The Association Between Fluid Administration, Oxytocin Administration, and Fetal Heart Rate Changes	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06036797` - Efficacy and Safety of Hydromorphone-ropivacaine Versus Sufentanil-ropivacaine for Epidural Labor Analgesia	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT05512065` - Changes in Velocimetric Indices of Uterine and Umbilical Arteries Before and After Combined Spinal-epidural Analgesia in Laboring Women	N/A
Completed	`NCT05327088` - Epidural Dexmedetomidine vs Nalbuphine for Labor Analgesia	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT03103100` - Comparing Bupivacaine, Lidocaine, and a Combination of Bupivacaine and Lidocaine for Labor Epidural Activation	Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT03623256` - Comparison of Intrathecal Versus Epidural Fentanyl on Fetal Bradycardia in Labor Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesia	Phase 4
Active, not recruiting	`NCT02271100` - Assessment of the Use of Ultrasound for Epidural Catheter Placement and Comparison With Palpation Technique	N/A
Completed	`NCT02926469` - Virtual Reality Analgesia in Labor: The VRAIL Pilot Study	N/A
Completed	`NCT03712735` - Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus For Laboring Obstetrical Women	Phase 4
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05565274` - Outcome of Combined Tramadol and Paracetamol Versus Pentazocine as Labour Analgesia Among Parturients	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT01708668` - The Effects of Intermittent Epidural Bolus on Fever During Labor Analgesia	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT02575677` - Oxycodone in Treatment of Early Labour Pain Efficacy and Safety

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Use of Standardized Algorithm for the Management of Epidural Analgesia for Labor and Delivery

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms