Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03975816
Other study ID # ANIpainlesslabor
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date November 17, 2019
Est. completion date August 21, 2023

Study information

Verified date August 2021
Source Changhua Christian Hospital
Contact Min-Ling Chen, MD
Phone +886-910-183-202
Email u9701401@cmu.edu.tw
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Epidural analgesia is considered an effective and safe method for obstetric pain control. Currently, self-assessment pain scales remain to be the gold standard in labor pain evaluation after the administration of epidural analgesia. However, individual patient susceptibility to pain perception makes difficulties for the clinicians to assess the effectiveness of painless labor precisely. The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity of ANI in obstetric pain monitoring during epidural analgesia.


Description:

Epidural analgesia is considered an effective and safe method for obstetric pain control. Currently, self-assessment pain scales remain to be the gold standard in labor pain evaluation after the administration of epidural analgesia. However, individual patient susceptibility to pain perception makes difficulties for the clinicians to assess the effectiveness of painless labor precisely. Without a convincing objective tool for obstetric pain evaluation during epidural analgesia, the clinicians are hard to adjust adequate epidural drug dosage. Establishing an objective pain index would help the clinicians to have a better pain management during labor. In 2012, M. Le Guen et al. demonstrated a linear relationship between visual analogical pain scores(VAS) and Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) values during labor. Their efforts started the application of ANI in obstetric pain monitoring. However, the reliability of ANI in obstetric pain monitoring under epidural analgesia have not yet been verified. The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity of ANI in obstetric pain monitoring during epidural analgesia.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 100
Est. completion date August 21, 2023
Est. primary completion date August 21, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 20 Years to 50 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Parturients with gestational age more than 35 weeks - Ages between 20 to 50 - Received epidural analgesia - American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I or II. Exclusion Criteria: - 1. Who refused to join the study - 2. With a history of arrhythmia - 3. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)Classification >= III - 4. With a history of cardiovascular, pulmonary, endocrine, neurologic or psychiatric disease - 5.Using medications that affecting heart rate - 6. Cannot understand the explanation of the study - 7. High-risk gestation - 8. Known fetal anomaly

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Analgesia nociception index
Monitor the maternity with Analgesia nociception index

Locations

Country Name City State
Taiwan Changhua Christian hospital Changhua City

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Changhua Christian Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Taiwan, 

References & Publications (1)

Le Guen M, Jeanne M, Sievert K, Al Moubarik M, Chazot T, Laloë PA, Dreyfus JF, Fischler M. The Analgesia Nociception Index: a pilot study to evaluation of a new pain parameter during labor. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012 Apr;21(2):146-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Feb 21. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The correlation of subjective pain measurement by the VAS score and objective pain measurement by the ANI(Analgesia Nociception Index) score The VAS(visual analog scale) score is a subjective measure for pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark by the patient on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain." The score will be transferred to a 0-100 index by divided 10 with the distance from the starting point to the written mark (in centimeter) and multiplied by 100. The ANI (Analgesia Nociception Index) score is a 0-100 index derived from heart rate variability which was applied as an objective pain measurement. The larger the index indicated less pain. The correlation of the VAS score and the ANI score will be analyzed to verified the strength of the ANI score in evaluating labor pain during epidural analgesia. 90 minutes
Secondary The correlation of uterine contraction strength measured by cardiotocography and the ANI (Analgesia Nociception Index) score Uterine contraction strength was measured by external cardiotocography with a scare from 0-100.The ANI (Analgesia Nociception Index) score is a 0-100 index derived from heart rate variability which was applied as an objective pain measurement. The larger the index indicated less pain. The correlation of the uterine contraction strength and the ANI score will be analyzed to verified if the ANI score changing with related to uterine contraction. 90 Minutes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03539562 - Therapeutic Rest to Delay Admission in Early Labor: A Prospective Study on Morphine Sleep
Withdrawn NCT04662450 - Evaluation and Management of Parturients' Pain Intensity N/A
Completed NCT02885350 - Spinal or Epidural Fentanyl or Sufentanil for Labour Pain in Early Phase of the Labour Phase 4
Completed NCT02550262 - Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Labor Analgesia During First Stage of Labor N/A
Completed NCT01598506 - Intrathecal Hydromorphone for Labor Analgesia Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT01636999 - Comparing Sedara to Butorphanol in Early Labor N/A
Completed NCT00987441 - Epidural Labor Analgesia and Infant Neurobehavior N/A
Completed NCT00755092 - Effect of Doula in Nulliparas and Multiparas N/A
Terminated NCT00787176 - The Association Between Fluid Administration, Oxytocin Administration, and Fetal Heart Rate Changes N/A
Recruiting NCT06036797 - Efficacy and Safety of Hydromorphone-ropivacaine Versus Sufentanil-ropivacaine for Epidural Labor Analgesia Phase 2
Completed NCT05512065 - Changes in Velocimetric Indices of Uterine and Umbilical Arteries Before and After Combined Spinal-epidural Analgesia in Laboring Women N/A
Completed NCT05327088 - Epidural Dexmedetomidine vs Nalbuphine for Labor Analgesia Phase 2
Completed NCT03103100 - Comparing Bupivacaine, Lidocaine, and a Combination of Bupivacaine and Lidocaine for Labor Epidural Activation Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03623256 - Comparison of Intrathecal Versus Epidural Fentanyl on Fetal Bradycardia in Labor Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesia Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT02271100 - Assessment of the Use of Ultrasound for Epidural Catheter Placement and Comparison With Palpation Technique N/A
Completed NCT02926469 - Virtual Reality Analgesia in Labor: The VRAIL Pilot Study N/A
Completed NCT03712735 - Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus For Laboring Obstetrical Women Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT05565274 - Outcome of Combined Tramadol and Paracetamol Versus Pentazocine as Labour Analgesia Among Parturients N/A
Recruiting NCT02575677 - Oxycodone in Treatment of Early Labour Pain Efficacy and Safety
Recruiting NCT01708668 - The Effects of Intermittent Epidural Bolus on Fever During Labor Analgesia N/A