Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

This study investigates the effect of ambulation (walking) during first stage of labour on maternal and neonatal outcomes. In the intervention group women will be encouraged to ambulate and women in the control group will receive usual maternity care.


Clinical Trial Description

Walking and upright positions in the first stage of labour reduces the duration of labour, the risk of caesarean birth, and the need for epidurals. Movement is a safe and healthy coping strategy for pain, and confining labouring women to bed increases pain and decreases women's satisfaction with their birth experience . Despite that ambulation and upright positioning during labour does not harm mother, fetus, or newborn, women are still largely confined to bed during the first stage of labour. The increased use of medical interventions such as epidural analgesia, continuous electronic fetal monitoring, intravenous infusions for fluids and electrolytes, and a restrictive birthing environment limits women's instinctive responses to labour pain and contractions rather than assisting the woman to cope with the pain and anxiety of labour .

In Jordan practices in maternity wards are not based on best evidence.The majority of health facilities restrict movement during labour, women were confined to bed in the lithotomy position and most of these facilities strap women in the delivery position, women have no choice to assume the position they prefer during labour and delivery. The practice of restricting women's movement in labour is contrary to the statements and recommendations of professional organizations advocate for women to move about during the first stage of labour, as long as they remain low-risk. Implementing evidence-based maternity care in developing countries with limited resources such as Jordan is particularly challenging, and requires commitment to applying the most up to date evidence to clinical decisions.

The purpose of this study is to begin investigation that could help provide a better quality of care during birth and improve maternity outcomes in one Jordanian hospital. The process was introducing an evidence-based practice of encouraging women to ambulate and assume the upright position during the first stage of labour and observing if results would suggest low cost modifications for the maternity health service environment, especially the labour ward. This is the first study that has attempted to implement and evaluate such an intervention in Jordan.

Methods A randomised controlled study will be conducted with primiparous women who come to give birth at Al- Karak Hospital in Jordan. Women will be subsequently randomised into the groups using a table of random numbers. "Ambulation during labour" here will refer to moving from place to place during the first stage of labour that reduces the amount of time a woman spends laying down during this stage (measured by recording the number of minutes spend on walking).

The setting for this study will be the maternity ward at Al-Karak hospital, the main governmental and teaching hospital in the southern region of Jordan. In 2016 2,808 births occurred in this hospital, 59% were caesarean births . In this hospital, the woman usually labours in 26- bed ward with restrictions on movement. This is consistent practice nationally. Certified midwives, resident physicians, and obstetricians provide care. Midwives in this hospital work with uncomplicated labours and help obstetricians with complicated cases.

The sample size was calculated using the G power version 3.1. Based on difference between two independent groups, alpha= 0.05, median effect size 0.3, power =95%, sample size required for each group is 88 women. To overcome attrition, 25% of the calculated sample will be added, the final sample size will be 110 women in each group.

Data will be collected using structured tool developed by the researchers based on literature review of research related to the current topic. The tool composed of section collecting the socio-demographic data and another section collecting maternal and neonatal outcomes. The research tool was reviewed by a panel (n=3) of experts in maternity health field. Before starting the study, the final version of the tool will be tested in a pilot study to evaluate its feasibility, clarity, and reliability. Assistant researcher (midwife) will complete the first section of the tool, which related to socio-demographic data, and will allocate participants to control and intervention group according to the randomization list. The principal researcher will be kept blind for those participants who are in the intervention and control groups. Completing the second part of the study tool, which is related to maternal and infant health outcomes, will be in maternal ward and by the primary investigators 24 to 48 hours after birth. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03447015
Study type Interventional
Source Mutah University
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date March 1, 2018
Completion date February 20, 2019

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03539562 - Therapeutic Rest to Delay Admission in Early Labor: A Prospective Study on Morphine Sleep
Withdrawn NCT04662450 - Evaluation and Management of Parturients' Pain Intensity N/A
Completed NCT02885350 - Spinal or Epidural Fentanyl or Sufentanil for Labour Pain in Early Phase of the Labour Phase 4
Completed NCT02550262 - Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Labor Analgesia During First Stage of Labor N/A
Completed NCT01598506 - Intrathecal Hydromorphone for Labor Analgesia Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT01636999 - Comparing Sedara to Butorphanol in Early Labor N/A
Completed NCT00987441 - Epidural Labor Analgesia and Infant Neurobehavior N/A
Completed NCT00755092 - Effect of Doula in Nulliparas and Multiparas N/A
Terminated NCT00787176 - The Association Between Fluid Administration, Oxytocin Administration, and Fetal Heart Rate Changes N/A
Recruiting NCT06036797 - Efficacy and Safety of Hydromorphone-ropivacaine Versus Sufentanil-ropivacaine for Epidural Labor Analgesia Phase 2
Completed NCT05512065 - Changes in Velocimetric Indices of Uterine and Umbilical Arteries Before and After Combined Spinal-epidural Analgesia in Laboring Women N/A
Completed NCT05327088 - Epidural Dexmedetomidine vs Nalbuphine for Labor Analgesia Phase 2
Completed NCT03103100 - Comparing Bupivacaine, Lidocaine, and a Combination of Bupivacaine and Lidocaine for Labor Epidural Activation Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03623256 - Comparison of Intrathecal Versus Epidural Fentanyl on Fetal Bradycardia in Labor Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesia Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT02271100 - Assessment of the Use of Ultrasound for Epidural Catheter Placement and Comparison With Palpation Technique N/A
Completed NCT02926469 - Virtual Reality Analgesia in Labor: The VRAIL Pilot Study N/A
Completed NCT03712735 - Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus For Laboring Obstetrical Women Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT05565274 - Outcome of Combined Tramadol and Paracetamol Versus Pentazocine as Labour Analgesia Among Parturients N/A
Recruiting NCT02575677 - Oxycodone in Treatment of Early Labour Pain Efficacy and Safety
Recruiting NCT01708668 - The Effects of Intermittent Epidural Bolus on Fever During Labor Analgesia N/A