Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Labor Analgesia During First Stage of Labor 2

Labor Pain Clinical Trial

Official title:

Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Labor Analgesia During First Stage of Labor: A Sequential Allocation Trial to Determine the Optimum Interval Time Between Boluses of a Fixed Volume of 5 of Bupivacaine 0.125% Plus Fentanyl 2 mcg/ml.

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02758405
• Other study ID #: 16-03
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: April 29, 2016
• Last updated: May 23, 2017
• Start date: May 2016
• Est. completion date: February 2017

Study information

• Verified date: May 2017
• Source: Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Brief Summary:

Until recently, at Mount Sinai Hospital, epidural analgesia for labor pain was delivered with a pump that could only provide continuous infusion of the freezing medication in combination of pushes of medication activated by the patient, a technique called patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). In the last decade or so, the literature has suggested that this continuous infusion of medication is not as effective as previously thought, and suggested that instead of continuous infusion, intermittent programmed pushes should be used. The investigators now have devices that are able to do that. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) is a new technological advance based on the concept that boluses of freezing medication in the epidural space are superior to continuous epidural infusion (CEI). The investigators are currently using pumps set up with PIEB, in addition to what the patient can deliver herself (PCEA). Studies have shown that delivering analgesia in this manner prolong the duration of analgesia, reduce motor block, lower the incidence of breakthrough pain, improve maternal satisfaction and decrease local anesthetic consumption. The investigators have recently concluded a study at MSH using PIEB where they observed excellent results. However, some patients exhibited higher than necessary sensory blocks. The investigators believe that the technique can be optimized by using the same dose of the freezing medication, but using a smaller volume of local anesthetic at a higher concentration. This optimization may also further reduce the amount of medication used by each patient.

The hypothesis of this study is that there is an optimal interval time between PIEB boluses of 30 to 60 minutes at a fixed volume of 5 ml of bupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2mcg/ml that will provide women the necessary drug requirements, thus avoiding breakthrough pain and need for PCEA or physician intervention.

Description:

Studies involving programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) to date have provided an analgesic regimen that delivered an amount of local anesthetic that was below the patient's requirement per hour, as the studies were done in the context of an association with patient controlled epidural anesthesia (PCEA) as a rescue technique. As a result, PCEA requests were frequent and therefore these studies have not been able to truly understand the pharmacology of the bolus technique in the PIEB regimen, as the PCEA utilized by patients added an extra component to the regimen.

At Mount Sinai Hospital, PIEB devices have been recently introduced. Currently our standard epidural mixture is bupivacaine 0.0625% with fentanyl 2mcg/ml. Based on previous research done by the investigators, the current epidural regimen consists of 10 ml PIEB at 40 minute intervals, with PCEA boluses of 5 ml and a lock out interval of 10 minutes, for a maximum of 20 ml of the epidural mixture per hour.

In this study, the investigators will offer patients 5mL PIEBs of bupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2mcg/ml at 4 different intervals. PCEA bolus of 5mL of the same solution will also be available. The goal is to establish the ideal PIEB regimen that will be effective for our patient population using a higher concentration epidural mixture.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 40
• Est. completion date: February 2017
• Est. primary completion date: February 2017
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 16 Years to 55 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• ASA 2 or 3

• Full term (= 37 weeks gestation)

• Nulliparous

• Singleton pregnancy, vertex presentation

• Active labor: regular painful contractions occurring at 3-at least every 5 minutes and change in cervix

• Verbal Numerical Pain Score (VNPS) at requesting analgesia > 5 (VNPS 0-10)

• Cervical dilatation =2 = 5 cm

Exclusion Criteria:

• Refusal to provide written informed consent.

• Any contraindication to epidural anesthesia

• Unintentional dural puncture

• Allergy or hypersensitivity to bupivacaine or fentanyl

• Use of opioids or sedatives within the last 4 hours.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Labor Pain

Intervention

Drug:
• Bupivacaine
0.125% Bupivacaine plus fentanyl 2mcg/ml
• Fentanyl
0.125% Bupivacaine plus fentanyl 2mcg/ml

Device:
• Infusion pump
Infusion pump set to deliver programmed intermittent epidural boluses (PIEB) plus patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA).

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	Mount Sinai Hospital	Toronto	Ontario

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Adequate response of the patient, defined as no request for supplemental analgesia	Adequate response of the patient, defined as no request for supplemental analgesia (PCEA bolus or clinician administered bolus) until the completion of the first stage of labor or until 6 hours following initiation of the programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB).	6 hours
Secondary	Sensory block level	Sensory block to ice will be assessed bilaterally at the mid axillary lines, and the level of block will be the level at which the patient still does not feel cold sensation as compared to a control site (frontal part of the head)	6 hours
Secondary	Motor block level assessed using Bromage score	Motor block will be assessed with the Bromage score: 0 = able to raise the extended leg; 1 = unable to raise the extended leg but able to flex knees; 2 = unable to flex knees, but able to flex ankle; 3 = unable to flex ankle.	6 hours
Secondary	Hypotension	A decrease in systolic blood pressure greater than 20% from baseline (defined as an average of 3 readings prior to epidural).	6 hours
Secondary	Pain score	Pain score measured hourly using VNRS (0-10)	6 hours