Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Time Interval and Injection Volume

Labor Pain Clinical Trial

Official title: Effect of Manipulation of the Programmed Intermittent Bolus Time Interval and Injection Volume on Total Drug Use for Labor Epidural Analgesia: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Studies suggest that administration of maintenance epidural solutions as programmed or automated intermittent boluses, rather than continuous infusions, result in lower bupivacaine consumption, decreased need for manual boluses by the anesthesiologist, and greater patient satisfaction. In this technique, the epidural maintenance dose is administered as a bolus by the infusion pump at regular intervals instead of as a continuous infusion. However, the optimal combination of bolus volume and dosing interval has not been determined. At one end of the spectrum, a small volume and short bolus dose interval will likely behave like a continuous infusion. At the other end of the spectrum, a large volume and long bolus dose interval may lead to an increased incidence of breakthrough pain. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind trial was to determine how manipulation of the programmed intermittent time interval and volume influences total drug use, quality of analgesia, and patient satisfaction during maintenance of labor analgesia. We hypothesized that manipulation of the programmed intermittent bolus time interval and volume during the maintenance of epidural labor analgesia influences total drug use, quality of analgesia and patient satisfaction.

Clinical Trial Description

Traditionally, neuraxial labor analgesia was maintained for the duration of labor with manual intermittent bolus injection of anesthetic by the anesthesiologist via an in-dwelling epidural catheter. During the last decade, there has been a transition to maintenance of analgesia with a continuous epidural infusion. Analgesia is maintained with fewer episodes of breakthrough pain and parturient satisfaction is increased. The anesthesiologists' workload is less. More recently, use of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) has become popular; usually a continuous infusion is supplemented by patient-activated bolus injections.

Studies have compared the intermittent manual epidural bolus technique to continuous infusion, continuous infusion to PCEA without a background infusion, and PCEA with and without a background infusion. Studies vary in the epidural solution local anesthetic mass (volume and concentration), and lock-out intervals. The incidence and intensity of motor blockade is greater with continuous infusion compared to bolus administration of the same concentration/mass local anesthetic per unit time, whether the bolus is administered manually or by PCEA. Consumption of local anesthetic is less with bolus administration (manual or PCEA) compared to continuous infusion. Therefore, lower concentrations of local anesthetic are frequently used for continuous infusions.

Current pump technology supports continuous epidural infusion, PCEA without a background infusion, and PCEA with a background infusion. Current pump technology does not support programmed intermittent bolus administration with or without supplemental PCEA. Further study in this area may motivate pump manufacturers to redesign their pumps to support this type of drug administration.

The purpose of the study is to determine how manipulation of the programmed intermittent time interval and volume influences total drug use, quality of analgesia, and patient satisfaction during maintenance of labor analgesia.

Eligible women were asked to participate shortly after admission to the Labor and Delivery Unit at Prentice Women's Hospital immediately following the routine preanesthetic interview. Informed, written consent was obtained. At the time of request for labor analgesia the cervix was examined and a baseline Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain (100 mm unmarked line with the end points labeled "no pain" and "worst pain imaginable") was determined. Labor analgesia was initiated with a routine combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique. The VAS for pain was determined 10 minutes after the intrathecal injection. If the VAS was less than 10 mm, the parturient was randomized (by a computer generated random number table) to one of three programmed intermittent epidural bolus analgesia maintenance techniques: 2.5 mL every 15 minutes, 5 mL every 30 minutes, or 10 mL every 60 minutes. All epidural solutions consisted of bupivacaine 0.0625% with fentanyl 1.95 micrograms/mL. The initial programmed intermittent bolus dose was initiated 30 minutes after the intrathecal injection in all groups.

Programmed intermittent epidural doses were administered via a Hospira Gemstar infusion pump. A commercial pump that can be programmed to administer intermittent boluses and patient controlled boluses does not exist. Thus two pumps were prepared for each subject with the same epidural solution. One pump was programmed to administer the programmed intermittent boluses at a rate of 300 ml/hr at regular intervals. The second pump was programmed to administer the patient's controlled epidural analgesia.

VAS scores for pain were determined every 120 minutes until complete cervical dilation beginning 60 minutes after the intrathecal injection. A modified Bromage score was determined every 120 minutes during the 1st stage of labor (0=no motor paralysis; 1=inability to raise extended leg, but able to move knee and foot; 2=inability to raise extended leg and to move knee, but able to move foot; 3=inability to raise extended leg or to move knee and foot). Sensory threshold to a rigid von Frye filament (pressure applied with the rigid tip until the subject reported feeling pressure at the thoracic dermatome of T12, T10, T7, and T4) was determined bilaterally at initiation of epidural and 3 hours after the intrathecal injection. Epidural infusion was discontinued shortly after delivery. Prior to discharge from the Labor and Delivery Unit the parturient was asked to mark her overall satisfaction with labor analgesia using a 100 mm unmarked line with the left end labeled "not satisfied at all" and the right end labeled "extremely satisfied". ;

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Labor Pain

• NCT number: NCT00417027
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Northwestern University
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: August 2006
• Completion date: April 2009