Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03520530
Other study ID # 37133
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 9, 2018
Est. completion date December 1, 2019

Study information

Verified date July 2020
Source Christiana Care Health Services
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Shortening the second stage of labor, the time spent pushing the baby out, is important for positive mother and infant's outcomes. Lack of progress of labor for any reason is the most common reason for cesarean section in women having their first baby and the second most common reason for cesarean section in women who have already had a baby. In 2014, a large study done across the United States showed increases in complications in both mother and infant when pushing was prolonged, including uterine infection, postpartum hemorrhage, more extensive vaginal tearing, shoulder dystocia, 5 minute Apgar score less than 4, infant admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and neonatal infections. Therefore, the challenge is to consider alternative practices in order to maximize a mother's chance of a vaginal delivery and minimize these associated risks to both mother and baby.

Mouth guards are used primarily in contact sports, and have been demonstrated to reduce or prevent injury to the teeth. Additionally, it has been proposed that wearing a mouth guard increases the strength of different muscle groups. A recent randomized controlled pilot study including women with their first pregnancy using a dental support device (DSD) during the second stage of labor evaluated the length of the second stage and outcomes. They found a significant decrease of 38% in the length of pushing time in the group that used a DSD. Additionally, there was a decreased rate of cesarean section in this group, however a p-value was not reported. This study only included 64 patients. A second, larger trial did not find a significant difference in pushing time, however the rate of interventions such as a vacuum or forceps-assisted vaginal delivery and cesarean section were much higher in the control group due to prolonged pushing. The results of the second study are contradictory in nature, yet the researchers do not provide hypotheses into why this may be.

It is clear from the previously mentioned studies that further research is needed. Our hypothesis is that using such a device would help women to push more effectively during the second stage of labor thus shortening the time needed to push the baby out and increasing the rate of vaginal delivery. The purpose of this study is to determine whether wearing a mouth guard in the second stage of labor affects the length of the second stage of labor and improves mother & infant outcomes.


Description:

Optimizing the second stage of labor is important for positive maternal and neonatal outcomes. Dystocia of labor refers to a lack of progress of labor for any reason, and it is the most common indication for cesarean delivery in nulliparous women and the second most common indication for cesarean delivery in multiparous women. In 2014, a large US multicenter cohort study showed increases in maternal and neonatal morbidities when the second stage was prolonged, including chorioamnionitis, postpartum hemorrhage, 3rd and 4th degree perineal laceration, shoulder dystocia, 5 minute Apgar score less than 4, neonatal admission to NICU and neonatal sepsis. Therefore, clinicians are challenged to consider alternative practices in order to maximize a mother's chance of a normal delivery and minimize these associated risks to both mother and baby.

Mouth guards are used primarily in contact sports, and have been demonstrated to reduce or prevent injury to the teeth. Most commonly made of synthetic polymers, mouth guards function as a shock-absorber. Even among sports medicine literature, there is a call for more research into use and education about protective gear. Previous studies have shown that wearing a mouth guard increases the isometric strength of different muscle groups. Recent studies have begun to explore whether wearing a similar style mouth guard will shorten the duration of the second stage of labor. A recent randomized controlled pilot study including nulliparous women using a dental support device (DSD) during the second stage evaluated the length of the second stage and outcome thereof. They defined the second stage of labor as the time between complete cervical dilation and fetal expulsion. They found a significant decrease of 38% in the length of the second stage in the group that used a DSD. Additionally, there was a decreased rate of cesarean section in this group, however a p-value was not reported. This study only included 64 patients. A second, larger trial also looking at nulliparous women did not find a significant difference in length of second stage of labor however the rate of obstetrical interventions such as operative vaginal delivery and cesarean section were much higher in the control group due to prolonged second stage of labor. Though the results of the second study are contradictory in nature, the researchers do not provide hypotheses into why this may be.

Our hypothesis is that using such a device would help women to push more effectively during the second stage of labor thus shortening the second stage and increasing the rate of spontaneous vaginal deliveries that do not require operative intervention. Developing a way to shorten the second stage of labor and reduce the number of cesarean sections or instrumental deliveries could reduce the morbidity of mothers and their infants and decrease health care spending.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 154
Est. completion date December 1, 2019
Est. primary completion date December 1, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years to 55 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Nulliparous women

- Age 18-55

- Presenting for delivery at Christiana Care Health Services

- Singleton pregnancy

- Cephalic pregnancy

- Term pregnancy

Exclusion Criteria:

- Multiple gestation

- Known uterine anomalies, excluding resected uterine septums and fibroids

- Estimated fetal weight less than 10th% for gestation age with abnormal umbilical dopplers

- Estimated fetal weight less than the 5th percentile

- History of cardiac disease requiring assisted second stage of labor

- Oral implants, braces or active dental infection precluding mouth guard use

- Preeclampsia with severe features treated with magnesium sulfate

- History of shoulder dystocia

- History of myomectomy

- Maternal history of myasthenia gravis

- Maternal history of sleep apnea with home CPAP use

- Category III fetal heart tracing

- Active vaginal bleeding consistent with placental abruption

- Diagnosis of chorioamnionitis prior to start of second stage of labor

- Participation in another interventional research study

Study Design


Intervention

Device:
Mouth Guard
Patient will wear mouth guard while pushing in the second stage of labor

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Christiana Care Health System Newark Delaware

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Christiana Care Health Services

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (7)

Arent, S., McKenna, J. and Golem, D. (2010). Effects of a neuromuscular dentistry-designed mouthguard on muscular endurance and anaerobic power. Comparative Exercise Physiology, 7(02), pp.73-79.

Aviram A, Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Hadar E, Wiznitzer A, Yogev Y. The effect of intrapartum dental support use among nulliparous during the second stage of labor - a randomized controlled study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Mar;29(6):868-71. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1024648. Epub 2015 Mar 19. — View Citation

Farrington T, Onambele-Pearson G, Taylor RL, Earl P, Winwood K. A review of facial protective equipment use in sport and the impact on injury incidence. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;50(3):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.11.020. Epub 2011 Feb 3. Review. — View Citation

Gabbe, Steven G., Jennifer R. Niebyl, Joe Leigh Simpson, and Garland D. Anderson. 1991. Obstetrics: normal and problem pregnancies. New York: Churchill Livingstone.

Laughon SK, Berghella V, Reddy UM, Sundaram R, Lu Z, Hoffman MK. Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;124(1):57-67. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000278. Erratum in: Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;124(4):842. — View Citation

Matsuo K, Mudd JV, Kopelman JN, Atlas RO. Duration of the second stage of labor while wearing a dental support device: a pilot study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009 Aug;35(4):672-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.01010.x. — View Citation

Vidovic-Stesevic V, Verna C, Krastl G, Kuhl S, Filippi A. Facial and Dental Injuries Facial and Dental Injuries in Karate. Swiss Dent J. 2015;125(7-8):810-4. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Time of Second Stage of Labor Time in minutes Time from full cervical dilation (10cm) to delivery of the fetal head, approximately 2 hours
Secondary Mode of Delivery Spontaneous vaginal delivery, assisted vaginal delivery, cesarean section From time of randomization until delivery, up to one week
Secondary Instrumental Delivery Type of instrument used in assisting delivery From time of randomization until delivery, up to one week
Secondary Patient Satisfaction Patient satisfaction with device as measured by survey From time of randomization until delivery, up to one week
Secondary Perineal Laceration Degree of perineal laceration with vaginal delivery From time of randomization until delivery, up to one week
Secondary Apgar Score Apgar scores of infants at 1, 5, and 10 minutes From 0 to 10 minutes after delivery
Secondary Percentage of Time Spent Using Device Provider will estimate percentage of second stage that patient used device From time of randomization until delivery, up to one week
Secondary Neonatal ICU Admission Rate Number of infants admitted to the NICU From time of randomization until delivery, up to one week
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT05080309 - Effect of Oral Carbohydrate Intake > 44kCal Per Hour During Labour on the Rate of Instrumental Vaginal Delivery N/A
Completed NCT05276947 - The Use of Peanut Ball in Labor in Obese Women N/A
Completed NCT04756089 - Stimulation Therapy for Inducing Mothers N/A
Recruiting NCT03607929 - HIDRATA Study: Efficacy of a Hydration Protocol in Nulliparous Women During Labor N/A
Recruiting NCT05489315 - Quantifying the Impact of the Peanut Ball on the Duration of the Active Stage of Labor N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03600272 - Comparison of Combined Spinal-epidural Analgesia Versus Epidural Analgesia for Pain Management During Labor N/A
Recruiting NCT03471780 - Evaluation of Transperineal US in Labour
Completed NCT06387680 - The Peanut Ball Use on Labor N/A
Completed NCT05105893 - Effect of Date Fruit Consumption in Later Pregnancy N/A
Completed NCT06420453 - How Long Can Labor Last? Person Centred Care During Labor to Increase Safety for Women and Newborn
Completed NCT04729426 - Birthing Ball (Peanut Ball) Positions N/A
Completed NCT05196841 - The Effect of Fatima Ana's Hand on Birth Pain and Duration N/A
Recruiting NCT04771325 - Assessment of the Effectiveness of Continuous Labour Support by a Trained Companion of Choice on Events of Labor and Maternal Satisfaction in the Bugisu Sub Region, Uganda N/A
Completed NCT04349722 - The Effect of Hyoscine-N-butylbromide (HBB, Buscopan) in Augmented Labour Among Primigravidae Phase 4
Completed NCT04210908 - Biofeedback for Second Stage of Labor N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04548453 - Establish the uSI Values and End-user Training Material That Will be Used to Guide Oxytocin Dosing Actions Early Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05782816 - Low-Dose Versus High-Dose Oxytocin Dosing for Induction and Augmentation of Labor Phase 4