View clinical trials related to Labor Induction.
Filter by:Our hypothesis is that there is one sequence of labour-induction that leads to a better experience of childbirth than others. This is based on the following underlying theories : - Maternal satisfaction depends on the number of labour-inducing sequences - A longer labour-induction would be experienced less positively than a shorter one - The experience is correlated with maternal outcomes ( vaginal / Caesarian delivery, spontaneous birth or instrument-assisted birth, maternal complications ) and neonatal outcomes (neonatal complications, secondary hospitalization).
The primary objective of this study is to determine if planned induction of labor at 39 weeks for nulliparous with pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 reduces the incidence of cesarean section compared to expectant management
Effıcacy of dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double- balloon catheter among women in the induction of labor
The current study is a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial of Obstetric Cook Catheter combined with oral misoprostol for induction of labor in pregnant patients. The primary outcome to be studied is vaginal delivery rate for the Obstetric Cook Catheter in combination with oral placebo and the Obstetric Cook Catheter in combination with oral misoprostol. Secondary outcomes to be studied include the safety of the method, composite maternal morbidity and composite neonatal morbidity. The hypothesis is that there is a higher vaginal delivery rate in the patient whom receive both the Obstetric Cook Catheter and the oral misoprostol.