Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will compare vaginal and oral misoprostol, to determine whether a vaginal misoprostol regimen achieves a higher vaginal delivery rate in a real-world, high-volume setting, and whether this regimen reduces time and oxytocin need on a high-volume Labor and Delivery unit at Parkland Hospital. Our primary hypothesis is that among women with singleton, term pregnancies, cervical dilation 2cm or less, and indicated labor induction, the rate of vaginal delivery is significantly increased when a standardized vaginal misoprostol regimen is used, compared with a standardized oral misoprostol regimen.


Clinical Trial Description

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of a standardized vaginal misoprostol regimen will result in a decreased primary cesarean delivery rate among women with a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters of less who require induction of labor at term, compared with the currently used oral misoprostol regimen. We also aim to evaluate oxytocin use, time to delivery, uterine activity, indication for cesarean delivery, intrapartum and postpartum infectious morbidities, excess blood loss at delivery, and adverse neonatal outcomes in the overall population as well as nulliparous women specifically. This will be a prospective, cluster-randomized clinical trial to compare the rate of vaginal delivery achieved when two standards of care are used across a large population of women with indication for labor induction at Parkland Hospital. Eligible participants will include nulliparous and multiparous women at 37 weeks gestation or greater, with a living, singleton fetus and no major fetal malformations, in cephalic presentation, with intact membranes, no prior uterine scar, who qualify for prostaglandin administration and who have a cervical dilation of 2 centimeters or less, measured at the level of the internal os. Patients with non-reassuring fetal status, active herpes outbreak, a prior uterine scar, or any contraindication to prostaglandins (including 4 or more painful contractions per 10 minutes prior to prostaglandin administration) will be excluded from participation in the study. Computer-generated cluster randomization will occur on a weekly basis for all study participants, to either the vaginal misoprostol regimen (study group) or to oral misoprostol regimen (control group). According to the randomization protocol each week, participants will be randomized to either the oral misoprostol standard of care (control group) or vaginal misoprostol standard of care (study group). The study group will receive vaginal misoprostol 25 mcg every 3 hours for a maximum of 5 doses in those who meet criteria for prostaglandin administration. The control group will receive oral misoprostol 100 micrograms given every 4 hours for a maximum of 2 doses. Misoprostol will not be administered to patients who have progressed to active labor, defined as 4 centimeters cervical dilation. Intravenous oxytocin will be administered according to current PHHS protocol for both groups. No direct contact between the research team and patients will be required, as this is a systematic comparison of two standards of care. The primary outcome will be the rate of vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes will include maternal and neonatal outcomes. Maternal outcomes will include time to delivery, time (hours) of oxytocin, need for oxytocin, indication for cesarean delivery, labor analgesia, clinical chorioamnionitis, tachysystole, hyperstimulation syndrome, excess estimated blood loss, transfusion at delivery, endometritis, surgical site infection, uterine rupture, and unplanned hysterectomy. Neonatal outcomes will include meconium-stained amniotic fluid, umbilical cord pH <7.0, 5-minute Apgar <4, neonatal intubation or ventilation in the delivery room, neonatal sepsis, and neonatal intensive care (NICU) admission. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04755218
Study type Observational
Source University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Contact
Status Completed
Phase
Start date May 24, 2021
Completion date July 7, 2023

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03442582 - Afluria Pregnancy Registry
Terminated NCT02161861 - Improvement of IVF Fertilization Rates, by the Cyclic Tripeptide FEE - Prospective Randomized Study N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05934318 - L-ArGinine to pRevent advErse prEgnancy Outcomes (AGREE) N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05415371 - Persistent Poverty Counties Pregnant Women With Medicaid N/A
Completed NCT04548102 - Effects of Fetal Movement Counting on Maternal and Fetal Outcome Among High Risk Pregnant Woman N/A
Completed NCT03218956 - Protein Requirement During Lactation N/A
Completed NCT02191605 - Computer-delivered Screening & Brief Intervention for Marijuana Use in Pregnancy N/A
Completed NCT02223637 - Meningococcal Quadrivalent CRM-197 Conjugate Vaccine Pregnancy Registry
Recruiting NCT06049953 - Maternal And Infant Antipsychotic Study
Completed NCT02577536 - PregSource: Crowdsourcing to Understand Pregnancy
Not yet recruiting NCT06336434 - CREATE - Cabotegravir & Rilpivirine Antiretroviral Therapy in Pregnancy Phase 1/Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT05412238 - Formulation and Evaluation of the Efficacy of Macro- and Micronutrient Sachets on Pregnant Mothers and Children Aged 6-60 Months N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04786587 - Alcohol Self-reporting During Pregnancy. AUTOQUEST Study.
Not yet recruiting NCT05028387 - Telemedicine Medical Abortion Service Using the "No-test" Protocol in Ukraine and Uzbekistan.
Completed NCT02783170 - Safety and Immunogenicity of Simultaneous Tdap and IIV in Pregnant Women Phase 4
Completed NCT02683005 - Study of Hepatitis C Treatment During Pregnancy Phase 1
Recruiting NCT02507180 - Safely Ruling Out Deep Vein Thrombosis in Pregnancy With the LEFt Clinical Decision Rule and D-Dimer
Recruiting NCT02619188 - Nutritional Markers in Normal and Hyperemesis Pregnancies N/A
Recruiting NCT02564250 - Maternal Metabolism and Pregnancy Outcomes in Obese Pregnant Women N/A
Terminated NCT02546193 - Outpatient Foley Catheter Compared to Usual Inpatient Care for Labor Induction N/A