Labor Epidural Analgesia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparative Study of the Combination of Different Modes of Administration of Local Anesthetics in Labor Analgesia
The investigators have design an observational study to know the anesthetic consumption in
terms of rescue analgesia (Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) and manual boluses)
of the combination of different modes of administration of local anesthetic in the epidural
space during labor analgesia offered by the new version of the CADD® infusion pump.
Also in this pump the anesthetic can be administered across a system of standard flow
(40-250ml/h) or of high flow (40-500ml/h), what according to studies can influence the
diffusion epidural of the anesthetic and therefore the level of sensitive blockade.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 151 |
Est. completion date | February 28, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | February 28, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 45 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Pregnant women in work of established labor and contractions of moderate intensity - Age between 18 and 45 years - ASA I and II - Nulliparity - Pregnancy to term (> 36semanas) - The only fetus of cephalic presentation - Cervical dilation between 2-5cm Exclusion Criteria: - Maternal systemic illness (Diabetes Mellitus, arterial Hypertension, Preeclampsia. . ) - Major or equal weight to 100 Kg - Less height of 150cm - Duration of the equal or major childbearing to 24h - Administration of opioides parenterales in 2-4h before to performing of the epidural - Contraindication for neuroaxial analgesia - Precedents of allergy or hypersensitivity to anesthetic local |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Spain | Hospital Universitario de La Plana | Villarreal | Castellón |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Marian Daras | Hospital Universitario de la Plana |
Spain,
Albright GA, Forster RM. The safety and efficacy of combined spinal and epidural analgesia/anesthesia (6,002 blocks) in a community hospital. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999 Mar-Apr;24(2):117-25. — View Citation
Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5:CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4. Review. — View Citation
Beaubien G, Drolet P, Girard M, Grenier Y. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with fentanyl-bupivacaine: influence of prior dural puncture. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000 May-Jun;25(3):254-8. — View Citation
Beilin Y, Guinn NR, Bernstein HH, Zahn J, Hossain S, Bodian CA. Local anesthetics and mode of delivery: bupivacaine versus ropivacaine versus levobupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2007 Sep;105(3):756-63. — View Citation
Birnbach DJ, Ojea LS. Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) for labor and delivery. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2002 Fall;40(4):27-48. Review. — View Citation
Carvalho B, George RB, Cobb B, McKenzie C, Riley ET. Implementation of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for the Maintenance of Labor Analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2016 Oct;123(4):965-71. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001407. Review. — View Citation
Delgado C, Ciliberto C, Bollag L, Sedensky M, Landau R. Continuous epidural infusion versus programmed intermittent epidural bolus for labor analgesia: optimal configuration of parameters to reduce physician-administered top-ups. Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Apr;34(4):649-656. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1377166. Epub 2017 Oct 6. — View Citation
Epsztein Kanczuk M, Barrett NM, Arzola C, Downey K, Ye XY, Carvalho JC. Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Labor Analgesia During First Stage of Labor: A Biased-Coin Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Trial to Determine the Optimum Interval Time Between Boluses of a Fixed Volume of 10 mL of Bupivacaine 0.0625% With Fentanyl 2 µg/mL. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):537-541. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001655. — View Citation
George RB, Allen TK, Habib AS. Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2013 Jan;116(1):133-44. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182713b26. Epub 2012 Dec 7. Review. Erratum in: Anesth Analg. 2013 Jun;116(6):1385. — View Citation
Johnson RF, Cahana A, Olenick M, Herman N, Paschall RL, Minzter B, Ramasubramanian R, Gonzalez H, Downing JW. A comparison of the placental transfer of ropivacaine versus bupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 1999 Sep;89(3):703-8. — View Citation
Klumpner TT, Lange EM, Ahmed HS, Fitzgerald PC, Wong CA, Toledo P. An in vitro evaluation of the pressure generated during programmed intermittent epidural bolus injection at varying infusion delivery speeds. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:632-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.06.017. Epub 2016 Aug 3. — View Citation
Krawczyk P, Piwowar P, Salapa K, Lonc T, Andres J. Do Epidural Catheter Size and Flow Rate Affect Bolus Injection Pressure in Different Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Regimens? An In Vitro Study. Anesth Analg. 2019 Dec;129(6):1587-1594. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003650. — View Citation
Loubert C, Hinova A, Fernando R. Update on modern neuraxial analgesia in labour: a review of the literature of the last 5 years. Anaesthesia. 2011 Mar;66(3):191-212. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06616.x. Review. — View Citation
Patel NP, El-Wahab N, Fernando R, Wilson S, Robson SC, Columb MO, Lyons GR. Fetal effects of combined spinal-epidural vs epidural labour analgesia: a prospective, randomised double-blind study. Anaesthesia. 2014 May;69(5):458-67. doi: 10.1111/anae.12602. — View Citation
Polley LS, Columb MO, Naughton NN, Wagner DS, van de Ven CJ. Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor: implications for therapeutic indexes. Anesthesiology. 1999 Apr;90(4):944-50. — View Citation
Simmons SW, Taghizadeh N, Dennis AT, Hughes D, Cyna AM. Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD003401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003401.pub3. Review. — View Citation
Sng BL, Zeng Y, de Souza NNA, Leong WL, Oh TT, Siddiqui FJ, Assam PN, Han NR, Chan ES, Sia AT. Automated mandatory bolus versus basal infusion for maintenance of epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 17;5:CD011344. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011344.pub2. Review. — View Citation
* Note: There are 17 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Weight in kilograms | The weight in kilograms will be noted on the epidural record sheet | Just before epidural administration | |
Other | Size in centimeters | The height in centimeters will be noted on the epidural record sheet | Just before epidural administration | |
Other | ASA from one to five | The ASA classification will be noted on the epidural record sheet | Just before epidural administration | |
Other | Gestational week in number | The Gestational week in number will be noted on the epidural record sheet | Just before epidural administration | |
Other | Cervical dilatation at the time of performing the epidural technique in centimeters | The dilatation in centimeters will be noted on the epidural record sheet | Just before epidural administration | |
Other | Administration of parenteral opioids and the time of administration | In the epidural record sheet if opioids have been administered it will be recorded as YES and if they have not been administered it will be recorded as NO. If it has been administered, the time of its admnistracion will be indicated numerically | Just before epidural administration | |
Primary | anesthetic consumption in milliliters | The anesthetic consumption in terms of analgesia of rescue of the combination of different ways of administration of anesthetic in the space epidural. The quantity of extra analgesic is already by means of boluses of PCEA or by means of clinical boluses measured in milliliters | at the end of labour | |
Secondary | analgesic effectiveness with AVE | Measurement by means of the evaluation of the intensity of the pain that will be evaluated according to the analogical visual scale (AVE) with values between 0 and 10 | Baseline (just after epidural administration) | |
Secondary | analgesic effectiveness with AVE | Measurement by means of the evaluation of the intensity of the pain that will be evaluated according to the analogical visual scale (AVE) with values between 0 and 10 | 15 minutes after epidural administration | |
Secondary | analgesic effectiveness with AVE | Measurement by means of the evaluation of the intensity of the pain that will be evaluated according to the analogical visual scale (AVE) with values between 0 and 10 | 30 minutes after epidural administration | |
Secondary | analgesic effectiveness with AVE | Measurement by means of the evaluation of the intensity of the pain that will be evaluated according to the analogical visual scale (AVE) with values between 0 and 10 | every 2 hours until the end of labor | |
Secondary | Motor blockade from zero to four | The grade of motive blockade registers according to the modified scale of Bromage (from 0 to 3): 0 = it can raise the low extremities of the bed = it can bend knees and ankles = it can bend ankles but not the knees = it can bend neither ankles nor knees |
Baseline (just after epidural administration) | |
Secondary | Motor blockade from zero to four | The grade of motive blockade registers according to the modified scale of Bromage (from 0 to 3): 0 = it can raise the low extremities of the bed = it can bend knees and ankles = it can bend ankles but not the knees = it can bend neither ankles nor knees |
15 minutes after epidural administration | |
Secondary | Motor blockade from zero to four | The grade of motive blockade registers according to the modified scale of Bromage (from 0 to 3): 0 = it can raise the low extremities of the bed = it can bend knees and ankles = it can bend ankles but not the knees = it can bend neither ankles nor knees |
30 minutes after epidural administration | |
Secondary | Motor blockade from zero to four | The grade of motive blockade registers according to the modified scale of Bromage (from 0 to 3): 0 = it can raise the low extremities of the bed = it can bend knees and ankles = it can bend ankles but not the knees = it can bend neither ankles nor knees |
every 2 hours until the end of labor | |
Secondary | Sensitive blockade from T12 to T4 | The sensory level reached will be valued according to the loss of sensibility to the cold by means of a cotton with alcohol, noting down the dermatoma where it does not exist or diminishes the sensibility (T4: nipples level, T10: level of the bellybutton, T12: groin region). For statistical analysis of this variable a numerical value was given to each dermatome so that the highest value represents a higher sensory level and therefore more dermatomes with sensitive block (T12 = 0 and T4 = 8). | Baseline (just after epidural administration) | |
Secondary | Sensitive blockade from T12 to T4 | The sensory level reached will be valued according to the loss of sensibility to the cold by means of a cotton with alcohol, noting down the dermatoma where it does not exist or diminishes the sensibility (T4: nipples level, T10: level of the bellybutton, T12: groin region ). For statistical analysis of this variable a numerical value was given to each dermatome so that the highest value represents a higher sensory level and therefore more dermatomes with sensitive block (T12 = 0 and T4 = 8). | 15 minutes after epidural administration | |
Secondary | Sensitive blockade from T12 to T4 | The sensory level reached will be valued according to the loss of sensibility to the cold by means of a cotton with alcohol, noting down the dermatoma where it does not exist or diminishes the sensibility (T4: nipples level, T10: level of the bellybutton, T12: groin region). For statistical analysis of this variable a numerical value was given to each dermatome so that the highest value represents a higher sensory level and therefore more dermatomes with sensitive block (T12 = 0 and T4 = 8). | 30 minutes after epidural administration | |
Secondary | Sensitive blockade from T12 to T4 | The sensory level reached will be valued according to the loss of sensibility to the cold by means of a cotton with alcohol, noting down the dermatoma where it does not exist or diminishes the sensibility (T4: nipples level, T10: level of the bellybutton, T12: groin region). For statistical analysis of this variable a numerical value was given to each dermatome so that the highest value represents a higher sensory level and therefore more dermatomes with sensitive block (T12 = 0 and T4 = 8). | every 2 hours until the end of labor | |
Secondary | Blood pressure | The patient will be evaluated and there will register the blood pressure in mm of mercury | Baseline (just after epidural administration) | |
Secondary | Blood pressure | The patient will be evaluated and there will register the blood pressure in mm of mercury | 15 minutes after epidural administration | |
Secondary | Blood pressure | The patient will be evaluated and there will register the blood pressure in mm of mercury | 30 minutes after epidural administration | |
Secondary | Blood pressure | The patient will be evaluated and there will register the blood pressure in mm of mercury | every 2 hours until the end of labor | |
Secondary | Maternal heart rate | The patient will be evaluated and there will register the maternal heart rate in beats per minute | Baseline (just after epidural administration) | |
Secondary | Maternal heart rate | The patient will be evaluated and there will register the maternal heart rate in beats per minute | 15 minutes after epidural administration | |
Secondary | Maternal heart rate | The patient will be evaluated and there will register the maternal heart rate in beats per minute | 30 minutes after epidural administration | |
Secondary | Maternal heart rate | The patient will be evaluated and there will register the maternal heart rate in beats per minute | every 2 hours until the end of labor | |
Secondary | maternal satisfaction | On having finished the childbearing, from 0 to 100 will value the grade of maternal satisfaction as an evaluation scale: 0 = very unsatisfied with the analgesia provided by the treatment 100 = extremely satisfied with the analgesia provided by the treatment |
at the end of labor | |
Secondary | adverse effects | There will be noted down also the appearance of adverse effects as the sickness and vomiting, urinal retention, pruritus and fever. | at the end of labor |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06403982 -
The Influence of Oxytocin on Intrapartum Fetal Well-being and Delivery Outcomes in Patients Receiving Epidural Analgesia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02768272 -
PIEB vs PCEA With Epidural or CSE Technique. A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial
|
Phase 4 |