Knee Surgery Clinical Trial
Official title:
Post Market Clinical Follow-up of Knee Surgery Using FH ORTHO SAS Medical Devices (FH ORTHO SAS Knee Observatory)
NCT number | NCT06207968 |
Other study ID # | 2021-02 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | May 2024 |
Est. completion date | June 2044 |
Verified date | February 2024 |
Source | FH ORTHO |
Contact | Cindy Lai |
Phone | 631315494 |
c.lai[@]fhortho.com | |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational |
The objective of this observatory is to generate additional real life clinical data in accordance with local regulation (i.e. Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) study, a study carried out following the European Conformity (CE) marking of a device and intended to answer specific questions relating to clinical safety or performance (i.e. residual risks) of a device when used in accordance with its approved instructions for use (IFU). The difficulty of such an observatory is to be able to collect data on the different versions of the devices, on the different possible combinations of implants of an knee arthroplasty. The observatory must also be able to cover devices used in ligament reconstruction surgery. The observatory will be based on the principle of a "dynamic" cohort during the inclusion period, i.e. with possible inclusions to replace the premature exits. Technical solutions will be implemented to facilitate data collection from surgeons (electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) and from patients (Electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO) on smartphone/tablet/computer) when feasible. The data to be collected and the different follow-up times are based on our state-of-the-art, clinical evaluation plans and clinical evaluation reports.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 487 |
Est. completion date | June 2044 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2044 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Any patient undergoing or having undergone implantation of medical devices distributed by FH ORTHO SAS for knee arthroplasty and ligament reconstruction, used in accordance with their approved IFU, in one of the centers participating in the Observatory. - Patient is at least 18 years old at the time of surgery - Patient agreeing to participate after having been informed orally and in writing (with written consent if required locally) - In some countries, such as France, the patient will have to be socially insured to be included in the study. Exclusion Criteria: For Arthroplasty: 1. Infection, or latent infection 2. A mental or neuromuscular disorder that might create an unacceptable risk of instability, prosthetic fixation failure, or complications after surgery 3. Insufficient bone stock for proper implant fixation 4. It is the surgeon's responsibility to make sure that the patient does not have any known allergies to one of the compounds of the material listed on the product label. 5. Metabolic diseases that might compromise bone regrowth 6. Drug addiction 7. Incomplete bone growth For Ligament reconstruction: 1. Infection, or latent infection 2. A mental or neuromuscular disorder that might create an unacceptable risk of instability, prosthetic fixation failure, or complications after surgery 3. Insufficient bone stock 4. Known allergies to one of the compounds of the material listed on the product label. 5. Metabolic diseases that might compromise bone regrowth 6. Uncooperative patient unable to follow recommendations As the medical devices are used in real life according to their indications, pregnant or breastfeeding women are not excluded from the study, but for safety reasons it is not advisable to include them in the study. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | Clinique De La Chataigneraie | Beaumont | |
France | Clinique De La Miotte | Belfort | |
France | Polyclinique St Privat | Boujan-sur-Libron | |
France | Clinique Du Val D'Ouest | Ecully | |
France | C.H. Raymond Poincare | Garches | |
France | Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul | Lille | |
France | Hôpital Prive St Grégoire | Saint Gregoire | |
France | Polyclinique De L'Europe | Saint-Nazaire | |
France | Medipole Garonne | Toulouse | |
France | Hôpital Privé Océane | Vannes |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
FH ORTHO |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Patient satisfaction | A simple questionnaire consisting of 3 questions will be proposed to the patient. The 2 first one will be to graduate the satisfaction regarding the mobility and the pain of the operated knee and the last one is the yes/No question regarding the surgery reiteration. | 3-6months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years | |
Other | X-ray | check the position of the prosthesis using medical imaging. Desired position: Yes or No | 3-6months | |
Primary | Revision rate | Evaluate the revision rate at the longest follow-up possible for arthroplasty arm | 2 months, 3-6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years | |
Primary | Revision rate | Evaluate the revision rate at the longest follow-up possible for ligament reconstruction arm | 2 months, 3-6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years | |
Secondary | International Knee Society (IKS 2011) score | Mobility, Pain and Function for Arthroplasty arm.
It includes a 100-point objective score and a subjective score made up of 3 domains evaluating satisfaction on 40 points, patient expectations on 15 points using different items between the pre- and post-operative phases, as well as functional activities on 100 points. The total score was 255 points. There are no levels and the results are expressed as raw scores. Higher scores mean a better outcome. |
Pre-operative, 3-6months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years | |
Secondary | Complications/Adverse events | any adverse events leading or not to re-intervention (with or without change of the implant), including device malfunctions | During surgery, Immediate (0-2months), 3-6months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years | |
Secondary | International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC 2000) score | Mobility, Pain and Function for Ligament Reconstruction arm
This self-questionnaire is divided into three parts (symptoms, sporting activities, function) and gives a score between 0 (worst) and 100 (best). This score is interpreted as a measure of functional capacity, with the highest scores representing the best levels of function and the lowest levels representing symptoms. A score of 100 means that there are no limits to daily activities and sports and that symptoms are non-existent. |
Pre-operative, 1 year, 2 years | |
Secondary | Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale | Mobility, Pain and Function for Ligament Reconstruction arm The Lysholm Knee Score is a questionnaire that the patient completes with the therapist. The questionnaire is designed to assess the degree of knee instability, in terms of both impairment and limitation.
The Lysholm Knee Score calculates and rates an overall score from 0 to 100 based on 8 domains: squatting, locking, pain, stair climbing, weight bearing, instability and oedema. Doctors use this condition-specific subjective outcome score to assess a patient's progress after knee surgery or injury. Scores between 95 and 100 are considered exceptional, those between 84 and 94 acceptable, those between 65 and 83 fair and those below 65 poor. |
Pre-operative, 1 year, 2 years | |
Secondary | Tegner activity level scale | Mobility, Pain and Function for Ligament Reconstruction arm
The Tegner activity scale is a numerical scale with values ranging from 0 to 10, each representing a different activity. A person is considered to have an activity level of 10 if they play highly competitive sports such as rugby, football and soccer. A person who plays the above sports recreationally is considered to have an activity level of 6. A person with knee problems who is on sick leave or receiving a disability pension is considered to have an activity level of 0. |
Pre-operative, 1 year, 2 years | |
Secondary | Knee laxity (clinical section) | Mobility, Pain and Function for Ligament Reconstruction arm.
This questionnaire is completed by the physician. He will assessed laxity of operated knee, as: Pivot Shift test: absent (0), grade 1 (+), grade 2 (++), grade 3 (+++). |
Pre-operative, 3-6 months | |
Secondary | Complications/Adverse events | Any adverse events leading or not to re-intervention (with or without change of the implant), including device malfunctions | During surgery, Immediate (0-2months), 3-6months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years | |
Secondary | Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | for arthroplasty arm Pain rating scale. A straight horizontal line of fixed length, usually 100 mm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the pain to be measured orientated from the left (worst) to the right (best).
The scale is given to the patient during the consultation, the patient indicates his/her level of pain and the surgeon then transcribes the score. |
1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years | |
Secondary | Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | for ligament reconstruction arm Pain rating scale. A straight horizontal line of fixed length, usually 100 mm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the pain to be measured orientated from the left (worst) to the right (best).
The scale is given to the patient during the consultation, the patient indicates his/her level of pain and the surgeon then transcribes the score. |
1 year, 2 years, 5 years | |
Secondary | ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists)-score | The American Society of Anesthesiologists proposes five classes of patients requiring anaesthesia.
Class 1: patient in good health. Class 2: patient with moderate general illness. Class 3: patient with a serious but not incapacitating general illness. Class 4: patient with a life-threatening general illness. Class 5: a moribund patient who would not survive 24 hours without the procedure, the outcome of which is uncertain. |
Pre-operative |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT04752917 -
Do Noise Cancelling Headphones Reduce Sedation Requirements in Primary Knee Arthoplasty
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02918383 -
Subchondral Perfusion Mapping Using Indocyanin Green Laser
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05297539 -
Optimization of the Role of Action Observation in the Post-operative Rehabilitation of the Total Knee Prosthesis: (LOARAL 2)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01875289 -
Efficacy of a Modified Obturator Nerve Block Technique
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01685645 -
Does the Measurement of Pupillary Reactivity by an Automated Pupillometer Determine the Effectiveness of Local Anesthesia Under General Anesthesia?
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02124005 -
Evaluation of the Minimum Effective Concentration of Bupivacaine (EC50) in Femoral Block for Analgesia by Ultrasound After Knee Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02435251 -
Changes in Anthropometry Following Ambulatory Orthopaedic Surgery
|
||
Completed |
NCT03856983 -
Benefits of Observing Point-light Displays in Postoperative Rehabilitation of the Total Knee Prosthesis.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03190447 -
Wich is the Best Dressing in Wounds by Primary Surgery of THA and / or TKA?
|
N/A |