Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Withdrawn
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04936971 |
Other study ID # |
ACTIVA |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Withdrawn |
Phase |
Phase 4
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 2021 |
Est. completion date |
September 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2021 |
Source |
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Kidney transplant patients under an immunosuppressive treatment based on anti-calcineurin and
mycophenolate-mofetil and induction therapy with rATG who suffer from early systemic viral
replication by the CMV virus could benefit from the introduction of an i-mTor drug.
(everolimus) to replace mycophenolate mofetil. This conversion would be effective in slowing
down and controlling viral expansion without the need to initiate any prophylactic anti-viral
therapy thanks to the activation of the CMV-specific cellular effector response or to an
antiviral effect of i-Mtor itself.
Description:
Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common opportunistic pathogen in the first months
after solid organ transplantation, being associated with an increased risk of acute and
chronic graft rejection, graft loss and an increase in patient mortality.
The susceptibility to developing CMV infection is essentially determined by the host's immune
status against the virus, with seronegative recipients (IgG-) receiving a graft from a
seropositive donor (IgG +) (R- / D +) being the group with an especially high risk of
developing CMV infection and disease after transplantation. In fact, without the
administration of a preventive therapy for CMV, around 60-70% of this risk group will present
viral infection (replication of copies of CMV in blood) and up to 30% will develop systemic
disease (viral invasion of the tissue). However, the incidence of infection among R + / D +
seropositive (IgG +) patients under treatment with induction with anti-IL2RA and the
combination of mycophenolate mofetil (MPA) and anti-calcineurin drugs (CNI), can reach up to
40%, and up to 60% if induction therapies are administered with T-lymphocyte depletors with
polyclonal antibodies (Thymoglobulin®, rATG) (6). All this suggests that the assessment of
the immunological risk of developing post-transplant CMV infection is relatively poor and
that the humoral response to the virus does not fully explain the patient's immunological
susceptibility to the virus.
In this sense, it is well known that the subpopulation of CMV-specific memory / effector T
cells plays a key role in the control of viral survival replication in general and of CMV in
particular. While it has been reported that CD8 + cytotoxic T cells have the ability to
activate against a wide range of immunogenic proteins of the CMV virus, it appears that high
frequencies directed against the major CMV antigens such as those of immediate expression-1
(IE-1) and phosphoprotein 65 (pp65) play a critical role in the control of CMV viral
replication. One of the most precise functional techniques to study the cellular memory
immune response is the IFN-γ ELISPOT test, which allows knowing the antigen-specific response
at the individual cellular level, thus providing high sensitivity and specificity. Along
these lines, our group and others have shown how the monitoring of the CMV-specific cell
response with the IFN-γ ELISPOT test, both before and after transplantation, is capable of
identifying those patients with a high risk of developing infection by CMV, regardless of
immunization status. In addition, data from a prospective, randomized clinical trial led by
our group, evaluating the cellular response to CMV before transplantation using the IFN-γ
ELISPOT test, have confirmed the high negative predictive power in identifying those patients
with high risk of developing viral infection after transplantation, despite being
serologically positive.
Mtor (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitors, everolimus and sirolimus, are a class of
immunosuppressants commonly used in kidney transplantation both in the initial phase (de
novo) and in the maintenance phase. In addition, today it is considered routine clinical
practice in case of side effects mediated by CNI (tacrolimus or cyclosporine) or by
antimetabolites (mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolic acid) to replace the latter with iMtor
(conversion to iMtor).
Interestingly, recently reported clinical studies have shown a significant decrease in the
rate of both CMV infection and disease in patients treated with mTor inhibitors (i-mTOR)
after kidney transplantation, both in combination with MPA. as in combination with CNI drugs.
A recently published randomized clinical trial that included more than 2000 kidney transplant
patients has reported that the incidence of CMV viral infection in the CNI plus everolimus
group in the Serology D / R + / + group was 3.6% compared to 13.3% of the control group
treated with CNI plus mycophenolate mofetil. (RR 0.27 - CI 0.19-0.38) This effect has been
reported mainly among R + / D + patients, and even in those after receiving induction
treatment with rATG.
Although the mechanism through which i-mTORs can inhibit and block viral replication after
transplantation is unknown, it is suggested that it could be through their ability to
directly inhibit proliferation on the virus, or well, through some of the immunomodulatory
pleiotropic effects that they exert on the adaptive immune response. Along these lines,
beyond its immunosuppressive capacity by inhibiting the lymphocyte proliferation signal