Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05272800 |
Other study ID # |
3.484.130 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 1, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
September 1, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
March 2022 |
Source |
Catholic University of Pelotas |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Hemodialysis (HD) is life-sustaining in kidney failure. However, adequate fluid status
depends on precise estimation of dry weight (DW), which is a goal difficult to achieve. This
randomized open label controlled parallel-group trial aims to compare spectroscopy
bioimpedance (BIS) guided DW estimation with clinical evaluation alone. Maintenance HD
patients above 18 years old were randomized to monthly clinical evaluation (CE) alone or
added to twice a year BIS-guided DW estimation. Randomization was performed through random
number table. Follow-up lasted up to two years. Primary outcome was survival time and
secondary outcomes were rate of hospital admissions, systolic and diastolic blood pressure
(BP) change and number of prescribed antihypertensive drugs.
Description:
The study was designed as a randomized controlled open label and parallel trial, including
adult chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients (older than 18 years) on in-center HD for longer
than three months in the Dialysis and Transplantation unit of a southern Brazilian University
Hospital. The exclusion criteria were less than thrice a week HD session, lower limbs
amputation, pregnancy and pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or orthopedic
protheses use. All eligible patients or their relatives were asked to sign an informed
consent form before inclusion in the trial. The enrollment was performed from September 2019
to September 2021.
The research protocol was approved by the Catholic University of Pelotas Ethics Committee.
The randomization was performed by blocs according to dialysis shifts, using random number
table created in Stata 15.1 statistical software (StataCorp, College Station, TX)
Participants and researchers were not blinded due to the nature of the intervention. The
statistical analysis was performed by a blinded evaluator.
The main outcome was all-cause two-year survival. Secondary outcomes include overall
hospitalization rate and according causes, systolic and diastolic BP change (mean of the
three last post-dialysis BP measurement - mean of the three first post-dialysis BP
measurement), number of anti-hypertensive drug classes used after intervention time.
At inception, eligible patients had their sex, age and dry weigh recorded from electronic
clinical records before the randomization to one of two groups: 1) BIS, whose dry weight is
evaluated monthly by clinical examination and biannually BIS-guided; 2) CE, whose dry weight
is evaluated monthly by clinical examination alone. The follow-up time for primary and
secondary outcomes was two years. Data for hospitalizations, deaths, cause of death, and
anti-hypertensives in use were collected from the electronical medical registry.
Procedures and Equipment Bioimpedance spectroscopy Patients randomized to BIS group were
submitted to an initial evaluation using Body Composition Monitor (BCM) (Fresenius Medical
Care, Bad Homburg, Germany). The BCM provides information on extracellular (ECW),
intracellular (ICW) and total body water through a range of electric frequencies from 5 to
1,000 kilohertz (kHz). Based on these measurements, the equipment calculates parameters such
as overhydration (OH), derived from the difference between the extracellular water measured
and that expected for an individual of the same weight and stature in euvolemia. BCM also
calculates extra- to intracellular water ratio (E/I). The measurement was performed by
previously trained personal before a mid-week HD session, after five minutes of rest in the
supine position, using electrodes placed on ipsilateral high and lower limbs. The patient was
advised to avoid coffee or any meal 30 minutes before the evaluation. The data obtained was
stored in a memory card to be discharged and analyzed with use of an accompanying software
(Fluid Management Tool, Fresenius Medical Care). BIS has been validated as an accurate
estimator of extracellular volume against dilution techniques in HD patients.
1. Clinical Examination The clinical evaluation was performed by a nephrologist with
hemodialysis expertise and includes blood pressure measurements before and after a dialysis
session, lung examination searching for crackles and lower limbs (or sacral region for
bedridden patients) for edema. The aim of the examination is the estimation and/or
revaluation of estimated dry weight. The blood pressure was measured using a sphygmomanometer
(Tycos@, Welch Allyn, EUA) by the auscultatory technique, with the patient seated in the
dialysis chair and upper limb extended. The cuff was placed two to three centimeters from
cubital fossa, and a stethoscope (Litmann@, 3M, EUA) placed over the brachial artery to
detect Korotkoff sounds during inflation and disinflation of the sphygmomanometer cuff. Lung
examination was performed using the same stethoscope placed on posterior and anterior chest
during an entire inspiration and expiration periods. Lower limbs were examined by pressing
the indicator toe over the ankle and pretibial area searching for pitting edema.
Data Analysis The minimal required sample size was calculated based on the expected
difference in the main outcome (survival in two years) between intervention (BIS) and control
(CE) groups. According to previous publications on chronic HD mortality, we intended to find
a difference in survival of 20% between groups, resulting in a minimal sample of 134 patients
(67 in each group), to obtain an alpha error below 5% and an 80% power.
The distribution of the variables was tested by Shapiro-Wilk. Parametric variables were
described as mean and standard deviation and non-parametric by median and interquartile
range. The survival analysis was performed using Cox Proportional Hazard Regression. The
hospitalization density-rate, point estimates and confidence interval for the incidence-rate
ratio was calculated. The number of anti-hypertensive classes (0, 1, ≥2) were compared
between groups by Person's chi-square. The difference between baseline and final systolic and
diastolic blood pressure was tested by student's t test. The statistical package Stata 15.1
(StataCorp, College Station, TX) was used in analysis.