Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ Clinical Trial
Official title:
Mechanical vs. Alcohol Separation of the Corneal Epithelium During Surface Ablation Refractive Procedures
Verified date | July 2006 |
Source | Medical University of South Carolina |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
A recent survey of trends among the members of the American Society of Cataract and
Refractive Surgery determined that laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is the leading
surgical procedure for photorefractive corrections ranging from −0 to 3 diopters (D).1 The
same survey, however, showed a clear trend of participating refractive surgeons toward
surface ablation. Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was the first refractive surgery
procedure approved and performed using the excimer laser. Several techniques of epithelial
debridement have been tried with PRK-type surgery including mechanical debridement, laser
transepithelial ablation, a rotating brush, and alcohol debridement.
The Amadeus II microkeratome (Advanced Medical Optics Inc, Irvine, CA, USA) used for the
creation of a LASIK flap has an upgradeable platform that will allow the user to perform
mechanical separation of the corneal epithelium before photorefractive treatments. With the
use of this device, the corneal epithelium can be separated from the underlying stroma
without previous preparation of the corneal surface with alcohol. The separated epithelial
sheet can either be removed or replaced on the operated cornea after photoablation. This
surgical procedure, which has been called Epi-LASIK, represents an advanced alternative
surface ablation photorefractive procedure for the correction of ametropia. The purpose of
this study is to evaluate the clinical visual outcomes, healing rates, and patient
satisfaction when performing surface ablation procedures using mechanical vs. alcohol
separation of the epithelium.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 10 |
Est. completion date | August 2007 |
Est. primary completion date | |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Subject must be a candidate for surface ablation procedures in both eyes. - = 18 years of age or older. - Myopia = -6.00 D. - Astigmatism = - 3.00 D. - Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) of -6.00 D. - Capable of wearing a bandage contact lens. - Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits and other study procedures. Exclusion Criteria: - History of ocular pathology. - Very large pupils (greater than 8mm diameter, infrared measurement). - Thin corneas (preoperatively calculated minimal residual bed < 250 um). - If patient fit into the group of the usual exclusionary criteria (e.g. irregular astigmatism, asymmetric astigmatism, unstable refraction - most of these patients would not typically be considered LASIK candidates under normal circumstances). - History of previous refractive surgery. - Corneal irregularities potentially affecting visual acuity: keratoconus, corneal dystrophy, corneal opacities. - Participation in (or current participation) any investigational drug or device trial within the previous 30 days prior to the start date of this trial. - Intraocular conventional surgery within the past three months or intraocular laser surgery within one month in the operated eye. - Use of any systemic or topical drug known to interfere with visual performance. - Pregnant or nursing mothers and females of childbearing potential not practicing a reliable and medically acceptable method of birth control - Inability or unwillingness of subjects to give written informed consent. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Magill Laser Center, Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Medical University of South Carolina |
United States,
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04919291 -
Direct Comparison of TG and WFO LASIK
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT00344604 -
The Role of Psychosocial and Other Quality of Life Parameters in Evaluating Functional Changes Prior to and Following Laser In-situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)Changes Laser In-situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)
|