Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Brånemark System® dental implant osseointegration was introduced in 1965 as a novel approach to the replacement of missing teeth. Although this implant's machined, screw-shaped surface had excellent, well-documented, short- and long-term clinical success (Adell, R. 1987; Albrektsson, T., et al., 1981; Albrektsson, T., et al., 1986; Brånemark, P-I. , 1983; Brånemark P-I. 1987), newer implant designs were introduced that could enhance fusion of the implant to jaw bones, and better resist functional forces. One such implant, Screw-Vent®, has a fixture macro structure very similar to that of the Brånemark® implant. However, its fixture surface was acid etched (1-3µm) which could enhance osseointegration, and it has a longer, narrower machined internal-hex, friction-fit collar that could better resist functional forces.These characteristics should lead to less bone loss (Niznick, G. A., 1989). However, one clinical study (De Bruyen, et al., 1992) reported greater short-term bone loss with this implant compared to the Brånemark® implant, possibly due to its longer machined collar, and advocated long-term clinical studies. Therefore, this prospective within-subject clinical trial was undertaken in 1993 to first compare the Brånemark® implant with another implant, Swede-Vent®, a copy of the Brånemark® macro structure except for its fixture surface that was identically micro textured as that of Screw-Vent® by the same manufacturer. The effect on bone healing could then be compared between Brånemark®'s machined and Swede-Vent®'s micro textured fixture surfaces in the short- and long-terms. Since Screw-Vent®'s fixture surface was identically micro textured as that of Swede-Vent®, the investigators could then evaluate and compare the effects on bone healing of Screw-Vent®'s longer, narrower, internal-connection machined collar to the identical shorter, wider, external-connection machined collars of the Swede-Vent® and Brånemark® implants. All three two-part, platform-matched, parallel-wall implants were made of commercially pure titanium, had a very similar fixture macro design, were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (USA) and Health and Welfare Canada, and were commercially available in North America. Brånemark® and Screw-Vent® implants are still available, but the Swede-Vent® implant is not.


Clinical Trial Description

Therefore, between 1993 and 1996, 58 of 60 eligible participants had been recruited into a prospective, randomized clinical trial. This trial had been peer reviewed, had received ethical approval, and had taken place at the Université de Montréal's Faculty of Dental Medicine and its affiliated hospital dental department. Follow-up documentation occurred at one year, two years, and 15 to 20 years following prostheses attachment (ClinicalTrials Identification Number NCT01641198), and the results were published (Camarda, et al., 2018). The present study reports on data collected at the 25-year (24.6 ± 0.19 years, mean ± SE) follow-up (ClinicalTrials Identification Number NCT03862482), focusing specifically on the evaluation and comparison of the effects on peri-implant healing and functional osseointegration of the two different machined collar designs. That is to say, the identical shorter, wider, external-connection Brånemark® and Swede-Vent® collars versus the longer, narrower, internal-connection Screw-Vent® collar. Twenty-two of the original participants (41.5%, age 71.1 ± 1.2 years, 11 women, 110 implants) were enrolled into this study. All study procedures were performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments, and all participants signed informed consent documents prior to inclusion into this study. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03862482
Study type Interventional
Source Université de Montréal
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date June 3, 2019
Completion date December 31, 2019

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT06408506 - In-patient Comparison of Immediately Loaded and Non-loaded Submerged and Transgingival Healed Implants Within 4 Months N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05355792 - Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Clinical Outcome of the OmniTaper EV Implant in Single Tooth Restorations N/A
Terminated NCT00748670 - Treatment With Fixture Microthread™ in Patients With Poor Bone Quality and no Teeth in the Upper Jaw, When Using Two-Stage Surgery N/A
Completed NCT04873219 - Milled Versus Printed CAD/CAM Complete Dentures N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04545840 - Prospective Neodent® Zirconia System Study
Completed NCT00922935 - Comparison of Early and Late Loading in the Edentulous Upper Jaw Using Cresco Prosthetic System on Straumann Implants Phase 4
Completed NCT00905840 - A Study to Treat Patients With Edentulous Mandibles With Two Straumann 3.3mm Diameter Bone Level Implants N/A
Completed NCT00959530 - Comparison of Lingualized and Full Bilaterally Balanced Articulation N/A
Completed NCT00711022 - Study on ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ Implants in Patients Missing All Teeth in the Upper Jaw, Restored With Provisional Teeth Within 24 Hours N/A
Terminated NCT00295126 - REPI : a Randomized Open Label Trial Evaluating the Use of APC in Pre-Implantation Reconstruction of Maxilla Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03957265 - Prospective Observational Study of SynCone® Concept Phase 1
Completed NCT01909999 - Release of Osteogenic Markers in Immediately and Non-loaded Dental Implants N/A
Completed NCT00901017 - Comparison of Synthetic Bone Substitute and a Bovine-derived Xenograft in Horizontal Bone Augmentation N/A
Completed NCT01641198 - An Implant With an Acid-etched Fixture Surface and Internal-hex Collar May Achieve Greater Osseointegration. N/A
Completed NCT01878331 - Long-term Study to Evaluate Different Dental Implant Alloys in Straumann 3.3mm Diameter Bone Level Implants
Completed NCT02418117 - Accuracy of Computer Guided Implant Surgery N/A
Completed NCT02107612 - Randomized Study For Minimally Invasive Splinted Implants N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05007691 - Comparative Study of Maxillary and Mandibular Splints Used for the Treatment of Masticatory Muscle Parafunction (FEA) N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04328116 - Study of Neodent Implantable Devices of GM Zygomatic Line
Completed NCT05032170 - Intraoral Scanning Accuracy in the Edentulous Mandible