IUD Clinical Trial
— IUDinsertionOfficial title:
Trans Caesarean Intra Uterine Contraceptive Device Insertion Versus Conventional Postpartum 6 Weeks Insertion
To compare immediate post-placental intrauterine contraceptive device insertion versus conventional placement at 6 weeks interval (often referred to as delayed or interval insertion) as regard to:- 1. Patient satisfaction. 2. Expulsion rate. 3. Complications
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 20 |
Est. completion date | September 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | August 30, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 40 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age: 18-40years. - Full term pregnancies delivered by cesarean section. - Desire to have intrauterine contraceptive device (Cu T) as a contraceptive option. - Agree to participate in the study. Exclusion Criteria: - Allergy to copper. - Ante- or intra-partum hemorrhage. - Ruptured of membranes for more than 18 h prior to delivery or Chorioamnionitis. - Known uterine abnormalities e.g., Bicornuate/septate Uterus, uterine myoma. - History of ectopic pregnancy. - Desire for pregnancy within 1 year of delivery. - Intrapartum fever >38 c. - Sever thrombocytopenia. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | Faculty of Medicin | Assiut |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Al-Azhar University |
Egypt,
Hem E, Bordahl PE. Max Sanger - father of the modern caesarean section. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2003;55(3):127-9. doi: 10.1159/000071524. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | 1-Patient satisfaction and complication. | assessment of patient satisfaction using a questionnaire as follow:
Will you use the same method of contraception after the next delivery? Will you recommend the same method to your fellows? Are you happy or not with this procedure? give score from 1 to 10, 1 mean you are very unhappy while 10 mean you are very happy. have you developed any complication? |
6 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03868137 -
Multi-dose Ibuprofen Prophylaxis for IUD-insertion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04539899 -
Evaluation of the Influence of the Virtual Reality Helmet on Pain During IUD Insertion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04932382 -
Misoprostol Prior to Intrauterine Device Insertion
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04927741 -
Essential Oils Following IUD Insertion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05383924 -
Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion During Cesarean Section (CS) Versus Delayed Insertion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04389021 -
Virtual Reality Simulation for Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Clinical Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05187078 -
Allis Clamp Versus Single-tooth Tenaculum
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05339555 -
IUD Self-Removal Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04379102 -
The Role Of Local Anesthetics in the Management of Adverse Effects Associated With Intrauterine Device Application
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05875571 -
Intravenous Ketorolac Administration to Attenuate Post-procedural Pain Associated With Intrauterine Device Placement
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02076217 -
Quick Start of Highly Effective Contraception
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05700812 -
IUD Placement Without Sounding
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05252117 -
Uterovaginal Plexus Block With Articaine for Intrauterine Device Placement Patients Who Are Indicated for the Use of Copper IUD as a Contraceptive Method Will be Invited to Participate in This Research.
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05471362 -
Barriers of Immediate Postpartum Intrauterine Device Uptake
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04630548 -
Safety and Efficacy of Immediate Post Placental IUD Insertion in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05283798 -
Insertion of Copper T380 Versus Multiload IUD Post Partum
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06240260 -
TENS Unit for Analgesia During IUD Insertion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06042556 -
IUD Self-Removal: Evaluating an Online Guide for Self-removal in Clinical and Non-clinical Settings
|
N/A |