Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05289089
Other study ID # 2021P002996
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 25, 2022
Est. completion date April 11, 2023

Study information

Verified date May 2024
Source Massachusetts General Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this pilot study is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a customized positive psychology (PP) intervention for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) compared to a wait list control group.


Description:

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI; formerly known as functional gastrointestinal disorder) is characterized by abdominal pain and altered bowel habits, and conceptualized as resulting from complex interactions between biological, psychological, and social factors. The treatment approach for IBS is multifaceted and focused on symptom reduction rather than cure. For mild or infrequent symptoms, lifestyle modification (e.g., diet and exercise), reassurance, and education about the disorder can at times be sufficient. For moderate to severe symptoms, a combination of pharmacotherapy and behavioral health interventions is often required. A growing body of evidence supports the use of behavioral health interventions to target the gut-brain axis in DGBI - aptly referred to as brain-gut behavior therapies (BGBT). Though highly effective, existing BGBT for IBS face important limitations including scalability and acceptability. There is also limited focus among existing BGBT on the promotion of positive psychological (PP) constructs (e.g., optimism), which are deficient in IBS, associated with fewer IBS symptoms, and associated with lower levels of distress in both clinical and non-clinical populations. PP interventions have successfully been implemented in a variety of other chronic medical conditions to improve well-being, health-related quality of life, and health behavior engagement. PP interventions are highly acceptable and easily delivered remotely without extensive specialized training, which increases their scalability and reach. As such, the investigators plan to do the following in this project: 1. Examine the feasibility and acceptability of a 9-week, telephone-delivered PP intervention adapted to the IBS population 2. Explore the impact of the PP intervention on psychological, behavioral, and health-related outcomes, compared to a wait list control group.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 22
Est. completion date April 11, 2023
Est. primary completion date April 11, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - IBS Diagnosis: Adult patients with an IBS diagnosis documented by the patient's primary care or GI clinician and meeting standardized ROME IV diagnostic criteria. - Language and communication: English fluency and access to a telephone. Exclusion Criteria: - Severe psychiatric illness: Current manic episode, psychosis, or active substance use disorder diagnosed via the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). - Cognitive impairment: Assessed using a six-item cognitive screen developed for research.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Behavioral:
Positive Psychology Intervention
Participants will receive a treatment manual. For each session, a PP exercise will be described in the manual, with instruments and space to write about the exercise and its effects. Participants will independently complete PP exercises between phone sessions and review them with their study trainer during phone sessions. A total of 9 sessions will be completed over the course of the program.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Proportion of PP Sessions Completed by Participants Measured by proportion of PP sessions completed by participants in each group. 9 weeks
Secondary Ease of PP Exercises Participants will provide ratings of ease after each PP exercise, measured on a 10-point Likert scale (0=very difficult, 10=very easy). Weekly ratings will be averaged to provide an overall ease of the exercises. Weeks 1-9
Secondary Utility of PP exercises Participants will provide ratings of utility after each PP exercise, measured on a 10-point Likert scale (0=not at all helpful; 10=very helpful). Weekly utility ratings will be averaged to provide an overall utility score of the exercises. Weeks 1-9
Secondary Change in Positive Affect The positive affect items on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), a well-validated scale used in other intervention trials and in patients with medical illnesses, will be used to measure positive affect (Range: 10-50). Higher scores indicate higher levels of positive affect. Change will be calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 9 weeks. Change in score from Baseline to 9 weeks
Secondary Change in Optimism Life Orientation Test-Revised is a well-validated 6-item instrument used to measure dispositional optimism (Range: 0-24). Higher scores indicate higher levels of optimism. Change will be calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 9 weeks. Change in score from Baseline to 9 weeks
Secondary Change in Depression The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-depression subscale will be used to measure depression. This is a well-validated scale with few somatic symptom items that can confound mood/anxiety assessment in medically-ill patients (Range: 0-21). Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression. Change will be calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 9 weeks. Change in score from Baseline to 9 weeks
Secondary Change in Anxiety The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-anxiety subscale will be used to measure anxiety. This is a well-validated scale with few somatic symptom items that can confound mood/anxiety assessment in medically-ill patients (Range: 0-21). Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Change will be calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 9 weeks. Change in score from Baseline to 9 weeks
Secondary Change in Gastrointestinal (GI) symptom specific anxiety Measured by the Visceral Sensitivity Index (VSI) score, a validated self-report measure of anxiety specific to visceral sensations (Range: 0-75). Higher scores indicate higher levels of GI-specific anxiety. Change will be calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 9 weeks. Change in score from Baseline to 9 weeks
Secondary Change in Ability to Bounce Back from Stress Measured by the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) (Range: 6-30), a reliable 6-item measure of the ability to "bounce back" or recover from stress. Higher scores reflect greater bounce back resilience. Change will be calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 9 weeks. Change in score from Baseline to 9 weeks
Secondary Change in Ability to Cope with Stress and Adversity Measured by the 25-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) (Range: 0-100), a reliable and validated measure of resilience, defined as the ability to cope with stress and adversity. Higher scores reflect greater resilience. Change will be calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 9 weeks. Change in score from Baseline to 9 weeks
Secondary Change in Response to Pain Measured by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), a widely used tool to assess cognitive and affective responses to pain (Range: 0-52). Higher scores indicate higher levels of pain-related anxiety. Change will be calculated by subtracting the scores at baseline from the scores at 9 weeks. Change in score from Baseline to 9 weeks
Secondary Change in Perceived Stress Measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (Range: 0-40). Higher scores indicate higher perceived stress. Change will be calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 9 weeks. Change in score from Baseline to 9 weeks
Secondary Change in IBS Health-related Quality of Life Measured by the IBS Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) score (Range: 0-100), a validated disease-specific instrument measuring quality of life. Higher scores indicate better IBS-specific quality of life. Change will be calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 9 weeks. Change in score from Baseline to 9 weeks
Secondary Change in IBS Symptom Severity Measured by the IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) score (Range: 0-500), a validated disease-specific instrument measuring symptom severity. Change will be calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 9 weeks. Change in score from Baseline to 9 weeks
Secondary Change in Self-Reported Physical Activity Measured by the self-report International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). This measure assesses the types of intensity of physical activity that people do as part of their daily lives. All activities are converted to multiples of resting energy expenditure (MET) minutes per week. Change will be calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 9 weeks. Change in score from Baseline to 9 weeks
Secondary Change in Adherence to a Physician-Recommended Diet Measured with a single question inquiring if the participant followed the diet with possible responses including: never, a quarter of the time, half of the time, three-quarters of the time, or always. A score of 0-4 (0=never, 4=always) will be applied. Change will be calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 9 weeks. Change in score from Baseline to 9 weeks
Secondary Change in Adherence to Medications Measured with a 3-item questionnaire from the Heart and Soul study. Participants will be categorized as adherent (>75% of the time) versus non-adherent (<75% of the time), and this will be compared between baseline and 9 weeks. Change in score from Baseline to 9 weeks
Secondary Change in Avoidant and Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Symptoms Measured by the Nine Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder screen (NIAS) (Range: 0-45), a validated tool to assess avoidant/restrictive eating patterns. Higher scores indicate higher levels of avoidant/restrictive eating patterns. Change will be calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 9 weeks. Change in score from Baseline to 9 weeks
Secondary Change in Eating Behaviors Measured by the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 8 (EDE-Q8) (Range: 0-6), an 8-item questionnaire that assesses eating disorder symptoms over the past 28 days. Higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disordered symptoms. Change will be calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 9 weeks. Change in score from Baseline to 9 weeks
Secondary Change in IBS diagnostic criteria Measured by the Rome IV Diagnostic Questionnaire - Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) Module. This questionnaire provides inclusion criteria for IBS for clinical research studies. To meet criteria for IBS, participants must have the following for the past 3 months: (1) recurrent abdominal pain at least weekly; (2) pain associated with 2 or more of the following criteria: (a) related to defecation at least 30% of occasions; (b) associated with change in stool frequency at least 30% of occasions; (c) associated with change in stool form at least 30% of occasions; and (3) symptom onset at least 6 months prior to diagnosis. Change in score from Baseline to 9 weeks
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03720314 - Microbiota Profiling in IBS
Recruiting NCT06166563 - Exercise, Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Fibromyalgia N/A
Completed NCT05213910 - Study of a Management Strategy of Functional Bowel Disordes Related to Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) With a Mixture of 8 Microbiotic Strains N/A
Recruiting NCT05985018 - Traditional Dietary Advice Vs. Mediterranean Diet in IBS N/A
Completed NCT04486469 - Efficacy of Physiotherapy Techniques on Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). Pilot Study. N/A
Completed NCT06407609 - Positive Outcomes of the Supplementation With Lecithin-based Delivery Form of Curcuma Longa and of Boswellia Serrata in IBS N/A
Completed NCT04656730 - Effect of STW5 (Iberogast ®) and STW5-II (Iberogast N®) on Transit and Tolerance of Intestinal Gas Phase 4
Completed NCT04145856 - Combination of Alverine-simeticone and i3.1 Probiotic in IBS-D and IBS-M in Mexico Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04138225 - The Ecological Role of Yeasts in the Human Gut
Active, not recruiting NCT03586622 - One Year Home Monitoring and Treatment of IBS Patients N/A
Completed NCT05207618 - Utility of the Administration of Chesnut and Quebracho Extract for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Diarrhea Predominant N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06369753 - Visible Abdominal Distension N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05157867 - In Vivo Effects of Amylase Trypsin Inhibitors N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05100719 - The Role of Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Lactose Intolerance (LION) N/A
Recruiting NCT05001997 - Effects of Lactose-free Dairy Products on Athletes With Irritable Bowel Syndrome N/A
Recruiting NCT02953171 - Probiotics in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome N/A
Completed NCT03266068 - Epidemiology and Pathophysiology of Post-Infectious Functional GI Disorders
Completed NCT02977975 - Lacto-fermented Sauerkraut in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome N/A
Completed NCT02980406 - The Role of FODMAPs in Upper GI Effects, Colonic Motor Activity and Gut-brain Signaling at the Behavioral Level N/A
Completed NCT03318614 - Bifidobacterium Infantis M-63 Improves Mental Health in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Developed After a Major Flood Disaster Phase 2/Phase 3