View clinical trials related to Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
Filter by:The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of Tai Chi practice in reducing symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation (IBS-C).
This study will evaluate the effects of ORP-101 versus placebo on stool consistency and abdominal pain in patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea (IBS-D). It will also assess the safety and tolerability of ORP-101 in patients with IBS-D.
Prospective, open label trial to establish the ability of the SIMBA Capsule to accurately obtain a sample from the small bowel of participants with IBS (10 constipation-predominant (IBS-C) and 10 diarrhea-predominant (IBS-D)) and healthy participants (n=10). The accuracy of targeting the small bowel will be established by visual confirmation via X-ray. The clinical utility of the collected sample will be evaluated by analysis with samples obtained by the current gold standard (duodenal aspirate), as well as stool analysis and LBT.
Irritable bowel syndrome is a functional lower gastrointestinal disorder characterised by abdominal pain and altered bowel habit in the absence of organic pathology to explain the symptoms. Irritable bowel syndrome has a prevalence of approximately 10% in adults, shows a female preponderance, and is more common in younger individuals. In clinical practice, Irritable bowel syndrome accounts for almost a third of all gastroenterology cases seen in primary care, with a subsequent third of these being referred onto secondary-care for further evaluation. The economic burden of Irritable bowel syndrome, in terms of medical expense, work absenteeism and loss of productivity, is considerable. The exact cause of irritable bowel syndrome is unknown. Accordingly there has been a huge surge in interest for dietary therapies to help manage Irritable bowel syndrome. To date, there are only a handful of small randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of dietary therapy in Irritable bowel syndrome. In light of this we plan to conduct the first randomized controlled trial directly comparing the effectiveness of the low-FODMAP diet, British Dietetic Association diet, and the gluten free diet in Irritable bowel syndrome. Moreover, such a trial allows for a direct comparison of nutritional and gut microbial changes, both of which can suffer detrimental consequences following the implementation of restrictive dietary therapies. This study is also unique in that it takes into consideration the patients' perspective with regards to the convenience and cost-effectiveness of implementing such diets into routine day-to-day life. The study will aim to recruit 100 patients from Sheffield Teaching Hospitals gastrointestinal clinics. Following recruitment patients will be seen by a hospital dietitian where they will be randomized to one of the 3 diets. Participants will complete a questionnaire portfolio weekly for one month as part of the study
The purpose of this study is study bowel symptoms, quality of life, and personal factors that may affect your health. In Aim 1 of this study participants will be invited to complete 6 survey-based questionnaires online. In Aim 2 of this study will monitor the effectiveness of a 12 week therapy program on bowel symptoms and overall quality of life.
Background: The combination of Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus delbrueckii (Lactobacillus LB) has proven to be effective and safe for the treatment of acute diarrhea in children. Also, a clinical trial in adult patients with chronic diarrhea, showed a reduction in the number of daily stools. However, the evidence is not enough regarding the efficacy and safety of Lactobacillus LB for treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome with predominance of diarrhea (IBS-D). Justification for this study: Lactobacillus LB could be a promising treatment for patients with IBS-D; nevertheless, the scientific evidence in this context is limited and it is not recent. Therefore, is necessary to explore the efficacy and safety of Lactobacillus LB in patients with IBS-D according to Rome IV criteria. Hypothesis: Lactobacillus LB is useful to decrease the frequency and improve the stools consistency of patients diagnosed with IBS-D by Rome IV criteria. Primary Outcome: To compare the treatment with Lactobacillus LB at two different doses: a) 20,000 million / day, vs. b) 10,000 million / day; and to determine if one of them is better than c) placebo, to decrease the frequency (weekly average of the number of stools/day) in patients diagnosed with IBS-D by Rome IV criteria. Design of the study: Clinical trial, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled. Keywords: irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, Lactobacillus LB, treatment, efficacy, safety.
Background. Abdominal distention is produced by an abnormal somatic postural tone. We developed an original biofeedback technique based on electromyography-guided control of abdominothoracic muscular activity. In a randomized, placebo-controlled trial we demonstrated the superiority of biofeedback over placebo for the treatment of abdominal distention. However, the technique is technically complex and unpractical. Aim. To prove the efficacy of a simplified biofeedback technique for the treatment of abdominal distension. Selection criteria. Visible abdominal distension after meal ingestion; patients are able to identify the offending meal. Intervention. Patients will be randomized into biofeedback in placebo groups.Three sessions of either biofeedback or placebo intervention will be performed 30 min after ingestion of the offending meal during the first 3 weeks of the intervention period. Biofeedback: patients will be taught to control abdominal and thoracic muscular activity by providing a visual display of the abdominal and thoracic perimeter; specifically, they will be instructed to reduce the abdominal perimeter (girth); patients will be instructed to perform the same exercises before and after breakfast, lunch and dinner during the 4-week intervention period. Placebo: abdominal and thoracic perimeter will be recorded but not shown to the patient and a pill of placebo containing 0.5 g glucose will be administered; patients will be instructed to take a pill of placebo before breakfast, lunch and dinner during the 4-week intervention period. Primary Outcome Measure: Effect of the probe meal on the activity of thoraco-abdominal muscles (intercostals, external oblique, internal oblique, upper rectus, lower rectus) measured by electromyography before and after the probe meal. The response to the probe meal will be measured before and after treatment. Secondary Outcome Measures: - Effect of the probe meal on sensation of abdominal distension measured by 0-6 scales after the probe meal. - Changes in girth produced by the probe meal measured using a non-stretch belt placed over the umbilicus before and after the probe meal. - Sensation of abdominal distension measured by 0-6 scales after each meal (breakfast, lunch, dinner) over a 7-day clinical evaluation period before and during the 4th week of the intervention.
Randomized, double blind, controlled clinical trial, to evaluate safety and efficacy of L. reuteri DSM 17938 and L. reuteri ATCC PTA 6475 as adjuvant to reduce the severity of symptoms in adults with moderate to severe irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Primary outcome: Global clinical Improve assessed by the GSRS-IBS score. Adults 18-65 years, any gender, with ROME IV criteria for moderate to severe IBS and body max index <36 will be included. Prescreening will be run for 2 weeks, the intervention period will be 2/days for 14t weeks, follow by a 2 weeks period of observation with no intervention. Secondary outcomes include: a) Improvements in the stool patterns evaluated through Bristol Stool Form (BSF); b) Improvement of the quality of life (QoL) measured by Latin-American IBS-QoL questionnaire; c) Improvement of the depression and anxiety severity evaluated by the Goldberg Depression and Anxiety Scale; d) Frequency of rescue medication use and e) Frequency of Adverse Events (AEs)
The objective of LIN-MD-64 is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 12 weeks of linaclotide therapy (72 μg daily) in comparison with placebo in pediatric participants, 6 to 17 years of age, who fulfill modified Rome III Criteria for Child/Adolescent Functional Constipation (FC). The objective of LIN-MD-64 is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 12 weeks of linaclotide therapy (145 μg or 290 μg daily) in pediatric participants, 7 to 17 years of age, who fulfill the Rome III criteria for child/adolescent Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and modified Rome III criteria for child/adolescent Functional Constipation (FC).
The aim of our study will be to establish in how many subjects with gastrointestinal symptoms and previous diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), the clinical picture is attributable to non celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) or fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) intolerance. For this purpose, all subjects with IBS will take a low FODMAPs diet, which implies the absence of cereals and consequently of gluten, and those presenting symptom improvement during this dietary treatment, will be exposed to a double-blind gluten or placebo challenge, to make a diagnosis of NCGS.