Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03503279
Other study ID # 2017H0236
Secondary ID
Status Withdrawn
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 1, 2021
Est. completion date March 1, 2021

Study information

Verified date May 2020
Source Ohio State University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aims...

- To assess the difference in intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score following ETT placement using McGrath MAC® video laryngoscope versus conventional intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope for bariatric surgery patients

- To assess the difference in hemodynamic stimulation (airway manipulation) events in both groups

- To assess the overall difference of the duration (seconds) of ETT placement between both groups

- To assess the difference of the duration (seconds) of ETT placement during every attempt (maximum of three attempts) between both groups.

- To assess the difference of STOP BANG score between both groups

- To assess the number of intubation attempts between both groups


Description:

The failure to place properly an endotracheal tube (ETT) and to secure the airway is still significantly impacting morbidity and mortality in surgical and critical care settings. In addition, no assertive predictor factor will foresee the presence of difficult airway, most of them being acknowledged after anesthesia induction. The incidence of difficult intubation reported in different studies varies from 0.1% to 13%.

The gold standard device to place an ETT that has been used since 1943 is the Macintosh laryngoscope (ML). However, in contemplation of addressing these challenging factors related to endotracheal intubation failure, modern airway devices technology has been developed in order to improve orotracheal visualization, reduce orotracehal manipulation and ensure airway patency.

As part of these novel devices, several video laryngoscopies (VL) have s been developed to secure the airway and improve the management of difficult intubation. Difficult Airway Society (DAS) guidelines recognizes the usefulness of VL in difficult intubation by providing an improved view of the airway to clinicians and directly observe/report the effects of laryngeal manipulation.

Among several VL introduced recently, a McGrath MAC® VL was announced in 2012. McGrath MAC® is a self-contained VL with a single-use blade; its structure is similar to the ML, but without the channel that guides the tube and a mounted LCD screen on the handle that is connected to a miniature camera with a light source at the tip of the blade, allowing the clinicians to directly observe surrounding anatomical airway structures during a tracheal intubation. These features have shown a better glottis visualization and to be supportive during tracheal intubation of difficult airways.

The McGrath MAC® VL and ML are standard of care devices used according to anesthesia care providers' criteria at our institution.

A single-center, prospective, randomized, double arm study, will be conducted in order to test the following hypothesis:

Reduced manipulation of the airway using McGrath MAC® VL will lead to less hemodynamic stimulation events following intubation when compared to ML.

The non-disposable portion of the McGrath MAC® VL (upper mounted reusable video camera and the optic guide) will be cleaned between usages in accordance to manufacture catalogue and institutional policy (using disinfectants such as CIDEXTM OPA, a 0.08% paracetic acid solution or disinfecting wipes).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Withdrawn
Enrollment 0
Est. completion date March 1, 2021
Est. primary completion date February 2, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility 2.2. Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients (male or female) admitted for elective bariatric surgery under general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation

2. Age > 18 years old

3. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score 1-3

4. Patients capable of consenting in English language

2.3. Exclusion Criteria

1. Potential or history of difficult airway (see pages 11 and 12)

2. Past medical history of confirmed uncontrolled gastrointestinal diseases including delayed gastric emptying, dysphagia, or other gastrointestinal motility disorders that according to the investigator will not qualify for the study

3. Patients with uncontrolled metabolic disorders (e.g., diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease) or conditions that according to the investigator will not qualify for the study

4. Pregnant women

5. Prisoners

6. Surgery requiring patient positioning other than supine

7. Other mental, physical, and medical conditions where subject participation is inadvisable according to the investigator judgment

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
McGrath MAC® Video Laryngoscope
McGrath MAC® Video Laryngoscope have been developed to secure the airway and improve the management of difficult intubation. McGrath MAC® is a self-contained VL with a single-use blade; its structure is similar to the ML, but without the channel that guides the tube and a mounted LCD screen on the handle that is connected to a miniature camera with a light source at the tip of the blade, allowing the clinicians to directly observe surrounding anatomical airway structures during a tracheal intubation

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Ohio State University Columbus Ohio

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Ohio State University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Difference in intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score following ETT placement using McGrath MAC® video laryngoscope versus conventional intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope for bariatric surgery patients The Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) is a mixture of subjective and objective conditions that allows a qualitative and quantitative methodology to the progressive nature of the difficulty of intubation (easy=0, slightly difficult= 0 Through study completion, on average of 1 week
Secondary Difference in hemodynamic stimulation (airway manipulation) events in both groupsmanipulation in both groups Hemodynamic events are defined as:
Significant variation in heart rate (HR) (defined as an increase/ decrease in HR greater than 20% of the baseline HR levels during airway management, within 5 minutes after orotracheal intubation) and,
Significant variations in mean blood pressure (MBP) (defined as an increase/ decrease in MBP greater than 20% of the baseline MBP levels during airway management, within 5 minutes after orotracheal intubation).
within 5 minutes after orotracheal intubation
Secondary Overall difference of the duration (seconds) of ETT placement between both groups • The duration of intubation is defined as the time taken from the insertion of the blade beyond the incisors until the verification of the presence of three consecutive normal capnography wave forms. The length of time between the date and time when the start of endotracheal tube descent maneuver until the date and time when the tube is considered well positioned in the trachea, assessed up to 10 minutes
Secondary Difference of the duration (seconds) of ETT placement during every attempt (maximum of three attempts) between both groups. Difference of the duration (seconds) of ETT placement Procedure (The duration of intubation is defined as the time taken from the insertion of the blade beyond the incisors until the verification of the presence of three consecutive normal capnography wave forms.)
Secondary Difference of STOP BANG score between both groups Do you SNORE loudly (louder than talking or loud enough to be heard through closed doors)? Yes = 1 No = 0 Do you often feel TIRED, fatigued, or sleepy during daytime? Yes = 1 No = 0 Has anyone OBSERVED you stop breathing during your sleep? Yes = 1 No = 0 Do you have or are you being treated for high blood PRESSURE? Yes = 1 No = 0
BANG BMI more than 35kg/m2? Yes = 1 No = 0 AGE over 50 years old? Yes = 1 No = 0 NECK circumference > 16 inches (40cm)? Yes = 1 No = 0 GENDER: Male? Yes = 1 No = 0
Baseline (Preoperative)
Secondary Number of intubation attempts between both groups Number of intubation attempts Procedure (Time starting at first attempt to successful attempt)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03277872 - NoL, HR and MABP Responses to Tracheal Intubation Performed With MAC Blade Versus Glidescope N/A
Suspended NCT04253795 - Nonintubated Versus Intubated Anesthesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery N/A
Completed NCT02864017 - Immuno Nutrition by L-citrulline for Critically Ill Patients N/A
Completed NCT02900807 - CT-scan Airways Mensuration - Correlation to External Measurements
Completed NCT01823328 - Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Rapid Sequence Intubation Phase 4
Completed NCT02350933 - Endoscopic Evaluation of the Paediatric Airway After Prior Prolonged (>24 h) Tracheal Intubation N/A
Completed NCT01170455 - Nasal Intubation Using the Blind Intubation Device N/A
Completed NCT00980590 - Airway Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Lying on the Ground N/A
Completed NCT05515107 - The Laryngoscopic View With C-MAC Videolaryngoscope Miller Blade Lifting the Epiglottis or the Vallecula in Children N/A
Completed NCT06249659 - Impact of Extubation Location After Surgery on Perioperative Times
Completed NCT03677505 - KoMAC Videolaryngoscope for Double-lumen Intubation N/A
Completed NCT03328182 - Assessment of an Oral Endotracheal Subglottic Tube Holder N/A
Recruiting NCT02277405 - Pediatric Intubation During Resuscitation N/A
Recruiting NCT02277652 - Endotracheal Intubation Devices N/A
Recruiting NCT02073786 - Rigid Video Stylet Vs Conventional Lightwand Intubation N/A
Completed NCT02277418 - Venner a.p. Advance Video Laryngoscope N/A
Completed NCT01003327 - Comparison of the I-gel Laryngeal Mask and the Classic Laryngeal Mask in Patients With a BMI>25 Phase 4
Completed NCT00956592 - Clinical Evaluation of the Storz CMAC Laryngoscope N/A
Completed NCT00783731 - Low Dose of Midazolam is Superior to Conventional Dose for Rapid Sequence Intubation in Emergency Department (ED) N/A
Recruiting NCT03887897 - First Attempt Intubation Rate With Airtraq vs Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope N/A