Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02988167
Other study ID # 20160740-01H
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date June 1, 2017
Est. completion date October 26, 2018

Study information

Verified date March 2019
Source Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Knowing when to liberate critically ill patients from mechanical ventilation (i.e. extubation) is of great importance as both prolonged ventilation and failed extubation are associated with increased morbidity, mortality & costs. The study objective is to improve the safety of extubation by harnessing hidden information contained in the patterns of variation of heart and respiratory rate measured over intervals-in-time.


Description:

As a standard of care for patients who are intubated in the ICU; to assess ability to be extubated, a Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) is performed, where the level of ventilator support is reduced, and patient's response is observed to predict if they will tolerate extubation.

Spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) are standard of care in assessing extubation readiness; however, there are no universally accepted guidelines regarding their precise performance and reporting.

Given that health is associated with a high degree of variation of physiologic parameters (e.g. heart and respiratory rate), and illness & stress are associated with a loss of variability, the investigators have demonstrated that maintaining a high level of heart rate (HRV) and respiratory rate variability (RRV) prior to and throughout the Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) will predict successful extubation, and a reduction in heart rate (HRV) and respiratory rate variability (RRV) predicts extubation failure.

Research to date has already demonstrated the added prognostic value and the investigators have derived a predictive model based on continuous monitoring of respiratory rate variability (RRV). The investigators are now poised to evaluate Extubation Advisor (EA) software with the overall goal to transform monitoring and improve care.

This study is a mixed methods, pilot phase I observational study of the clinical implementation of a novel clinical decision support product, Extubation Advisor.TM In this study the investigators will evaluate the feedback of RTs as well as the feedback of MDs post-treatment (extubation) decision.

Questionnaires will be sent to Respiratory Therapists (RT's) and Medical Doctors (MD's) to solicit feedback on the electronic Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) Case Report Form (CRF) and the Extubation Advisor TM (EA) report. All questionnaires will be answered based on a rating scale of 1-5 where 1 is unacceptable and 5 is excellent.

As this proposed study is observational and has no impact on patient care/outcomes, and to avoid bias associated with requiring consent, the investigators believe this study represents one of the limited circumstances under which waived consent may be permitted.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 121
Est. completion date October 26, 2018
Est. primary completion date October 26, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. patients who have been or are expected to be on mechanical ventilation for > 48 hours in total prior to extubation,

2. patients who are ready for Spontaneous Breathing Test (SBT) for assessment for extubation,

3. the patients who are able to tolerate pressure support ventilation = 14 cm H2O (SpO2 = 90% with FiO2 = 40% and PEEP 10 = cm H20,

4. patients who are hemodynamically stable (off vasopressors or on low levels of vasopressors: phenylephrine < 50 ug/min; norepinephrine < 5 ug/min; dobutamine < 5 ug/kg/min; milrinone< 0.4 ug/kg/min),

5. patients whose neurological status is stable (no deterioration in the last 24 hrs, intact respiratory drive and ICP <20),

6. patients who have intact airway reflexes (adequate cough with suctioning and a gag reflex), and

7. patient who are in normal sinus rhythm at the time of the SBT (no pacemaker).

Exclusion Criteria:

1. patients who have "do not re-intubate" order documented on their chart or if withdrawal of life support is anticipated,

2. patients who have a tracheostomy,

3. patients who suffer from known or suspected severe myopathy or neuropathy (i.e. myasthenia gravis, Guillain-Barré syndrome) or quadriplegia,

4. patients who have been previously extubated during the same ICU admission.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Locations

Country Name City State
Canada The Ottawa Hospital General Campus Ottawa Ontario

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Introduce Extubation Advisor TM (EA) Introduce Extubation Advisor TM (EA) in an observational study in patients being evaluated for extubation, specifically by: (i) engaging RTs to ensure waveform (EKG, CO2) monitoring is in place during spontaneous Breathing Trials (SBTs) and enter clinical data and assessment into the EA data entry screens, (ii) providing RTs and MDs with the EA report at least 48 hours after extubation. 1 year
Primary Evaluate Respiratory Therapist (RTs) feedback on the Extubation Advisor TM (EA) Evaluate: quality and completeness of data elements and process of data entry, integration with existing RT clinical practice and workflow, time to completion of data entry, 48 hours post extubation/treatment decision obtain RT feedback on quality and overall impression of the report. 1 year
Primary Evaluate Intensivist (MD) feedback on the Extubation Advisor TM (EA) Report Evaluate quality and completeness of report, ease of integration into existing MD clinical practice and workflow, overall impression and potential impact on decision making. 1 year
Primary Evaluate technical feasibility of future real-time implementation of Extubation Advisor TM (EA) 1 year
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03277872 - NoL, HR and MABP Responses to Tracheal Intubation Performed With MAC Blade Versus Glidescope N/A
Suspended NCT04253795 - Nonintubated Versus Intubated Anesthesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery N/A
Completed NCT02864017 - Immuno Nutrition by L-citrulline for Critically Ill Patients N/A
Completed NCT02900807 - CT-scan Airways Mensuration - Correlation to External Measurements
Completed NCT01823328 - Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Rapid Sequence Intubation Phase 4
Completed NCT02350933 - Endoscopic Evaluation of the Paediatric Airway After Prior Prolonged (>24 h) Tracheal Intubation N/A
Completed NCT01170455 - Nasal Intubation Using the Blind Intubation Device N/A
Completed NCT00980590 - Airway Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Lying on the Ground N/A
Completed NCT05515107 - The Laryngoscopic View With C-MAC Videolaryngoscope Miller Blade Lifting the Epiglottis or the Vallecula in Children N/A
Completed NCT06249659 - Impact of Extubation Location After Surgery on Perioperative Times
Completed NCT03677505 - KoMAC Videolaryngoscope for Double-lumen Intubation N/A
Completed NCT03328182 - Assessment of an Oral Endotracheal Subglottic Tube Holder N/A
Recruiting NCT02277405 - Pediatric Intubation During Resuscitation N/A
Recruiting NCT02277652 - Endotracheal Intubation Devices N/A
Recruiting NCT02073786 - Rigid Video Stylet Vs Conventional Lightwand Intubation N/A
Completed NCT02277418 - Venner a.p. Advance Video Laryngoscope N/A
Completed NCT01003327 - Comparison of the I-gel Laryngeal Mask and the Classic Laryngeal Mask in Patients With a BMI>25 Phase 4
Completed NCT00956592 - Clinical Evaluation of the Storz CMAC Laryngoscope N/A
Completed NCT00783731 - Low Dose of Midazolam is Superior to Conventional Dose for Rapid Sequence Intubation in Emergency Department (ED) N/A
Recruiting NCT03887897 - First Attempt Intubation Rate With Airtraq vs Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope N/A