Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00956592
Other study ID # IRB00003272
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received August 10, 2009
Last updated April 3, 2018
Start date October 2009
Est. completion date December 2010

Study information

Verified date April 2018
Source Oregon Health and Science University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aims to evaluate the utility of a video assisted device for intubation (placement of a breathing tube) during surgery. This study specifically aims to compare a video assisted intubation with the CMAC laryngoscope to conventional devices in the setting of intubations predicted to be difficult.


Description:

Patients will be specifically screened for predictors by history and physical exam of potential airway difficulty. The role of video laryngoscopy in airways predicted to be difficult is poorly defined. This study aims to recognize if video laryngoscopy is more useful than conventional laryngoscopy as a first attempt for those with anticipated difficulty.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 300
Est. completion date December 2010
Est. primary completion date December 2010
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 99 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Adult patients presenting for elective surgery who are fasted and who have one of the following difficult airway predictors:

- mallampati classification 3

- mallampati classification 4

- Reduced mouth opening (<3cm)

- reduced cervical motion

- history of previous difficult intubation or multiple laryngoscopy attempts

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients less than 18 years old, patients who are not fasted (>6 hrs. NPO)

- Patients who have contraindications to the administration of neuromuscular blocking drugs

- Patients who have a documented history of intubation on first attempt with C-L grade 1 laryngeal view

- Patients who are deemed to difficult and dangerous to anesthetize without first securing an airway.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
CMAC video laryngoscope
Intubation utilizing the assistance of video enhancement
Macintosh laryngoscope
Patients will be intubated utilizing either a Macintosh 3 or Macintosh 4 designed blade

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Oregon Health and Science University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (1)

Jungbauer A, Schumann M, Brunkhorst V, Börgers A, Groeben H. Expected difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Apr;102(4):546-50. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep013. Epub 2009 Feb 20. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Measure of Intubation Success Success was measured by confirmed tracheal tube placement with one attempt. Any removal of the laryngoscope blade constituted a failure During each intubation in a 14 month period
Secondary Intubation Time Time was measured as the duration of laryngoscopy defined by blade insertion to tracheal tube cuff inflation During laryngoscopy procedure
Secondary Number of Participants Intubated With a Rescue Device 1 year
Secondary Number of Participants With Complications 1 year
Secondary Number of Participants With a Laryngeal View Grade of 1 or 2 vs. 3 or 4. Grade 1= full view of the glottis achieved Grade 2= partial view of the glottis achieved Grade 3= only the epiglottis visualized Grade 4= no laryngeal view achieved 1 year
Secondary Number of Particpants Requiring Adjuncts to Assist Intubation 1 year
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03277872 - NoL, HR and MABP Responses to Tracheal Intubation Performed With MAC Blade Versus Glidescope N/A
Suspended NCT04253795 - Nonintubated Versus Intubated Anesthesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery N/A
Completed NCT02864017 - Immuno Nutrition by L-citrulline for Critically Ill Patients N/A
Completed NCT02900807 - CT-scan Airways Mensuration - Correlation to External Measurements
Completed NCT01823328 - Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Rapid Sequence Intubation Phase 4
Completed NCT02350933 - Endoscopic Evaluation of the Paediatric Airway After Prior Prolonged (>24 h) Tracheal Intubation N/A
Completed NCT01170455 - Nasal Intubation Using the Blind Intubation Device N/A
Completed NCT00980590 - Airway Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Lying on the Ground N/A
Completed NCT05515107 - The Laryngoscopic View With C-MAC Videolaryngoscope Miller Blade Lifting the Epiglottis or the Vallecula in Children N/A
Completed NCT06249659 - Impact of Extubation Location After Surgery on Perioperative Times
Completed NCT03677505 - KoMAC Videolaryngoscope for Double-lumen Intubation N/A
Completed NCT03328182 - Assessment of an Oral Endotracheal Subglottic Tube Holder N/A
Recruiting NCT02277405 - Pediatric Intubation During Resuscitation N/A
Recruiting NCT02073786 - Rigid Video Stylet Vs Conventional Lightwand Intubation N/A
Recruiting NCT02277652 - Endotracheal Intubation Devices N/A
Completed NCT02277418 - Venner a.p. Advance Video Laryngoscope N/A
Completed NCT01003327 - Comparison of the I-gel Laryngeal Mask and the Classic Laryngeal Mask in Patients With a BMI>25 Phase 4
Completed NCT00783731 - Low Dose of Midazolam is Superior to Conventional Dose for Rapid Sequence Intubation in Emergency Department (ED) N/A
Recruiting NCT03887897 - First Attempt Intubation Rate With Airtraq vs Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope N/A
Completed NCT02931019 - The Effect of Head Position on the Intubating Condition Using Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy N/A