Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01375634
Other study ID # CHRMS:M11-131-NIMED
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received June 3, 2011
Last updated July 19, 2013
Start date May 2011
Est. completion date April 2013

Study information

Verified date July 2013
Source University of Vermont
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Nasogastric tube placement involves insertion of a flexible tube through the nose into the stomach. Placement of the tube can irritate the nose and palate and trigger gagging, causing discomfort, even if topical or local anesthetics are used. This study aims to determine if administration of an ultra-short acting sedative agent (midazolam) into a vein before the procedure, in addition to topical local anesthetic, will decrease the level of discomfort.


Description:

Our overall objective is to improve patient satisfaction with nasogastric (NG) tube placement (placement of a flexible tube through the nose into the stomach) in the emergency department. Placement of an NG tube into the stomach is often performed in the emergency department (ED) setting to evacuate air, blood, or other contents. Generally performed by nursing staff at the bedside in the emergency department, the procedure may produce significant pain and discomfort for the patient despite typical measures including local medications to constrict and numb the nasal mucosa. In one questionnaire of emergency department patients at a large university hospital, placement of an NG tube was reported to be the most painful procedure, ahead of fracture reduction, abscess drainage, and urethral catheterization (Singer et al. 1999). The typical medication used for placement of an NG tube placement is administration of local, topical medications; the use of intravenous drugs to improve patient tolerance of the procedure varies widely in clinical practice (Juhl and Conners 2005). Midazolam (Versed) is an FDA-approved agent for procedural sedation, which has been used frequently at this institution for the placement of NG tubes in the emergency department. In our experience, it facilitates placement by relaxing muscles, thereby decreasing gag, and its anxiolytic and amnestic properties improve patient satisfaction. However, there are no published studies of midazolam for NG tube placement in the ED or any other setting.

The investigators will perform a randomized controlled trial to determine if a single 2mg unit midazolam dose administered intravenously decreases discomfort for patients undergoing nasogastric tube placement in the emergency department. Adult emergency department patients who require NG tubes will be screened and following informed consent they will be randomly assigned to receive either midazolam or saline control. Medications are provided by pharmacy. Registered nurses will perform the placement and administer medications; researcher, nurse and subject will be blinded to the treatment arm. Following the procedure, subjects will be asked to assess their level of discomfort and complete a brief researcher-assisted questionnaire about their experience. The nurse will also complete a questionnaire that addresses the difficulty of the procedure, level of success, and occurrence of unanticipated problems or adverse events. This study may provide support for a clinical practice to improve care for patients requiring NG tube placement in the ED.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 49
Est. completion date April 2013
Est. primary completion date April 2013
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- at least 18 years old

- Receiving a nasogastric tube by a registered nurse at Fletcher Allen Health Care

Exclusion Criteria:

- less than 18 years old

- weight < 40 kg

- Need immediate nasogastric tube placement

- Endotracheal intubation

- Hemodynamically unstable

- Non-English speaking

- Without capacity to provide informed consent

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Midazolam
2 mg intravenous over 2 minutes For patients >60 years of age or with history of pulmonary disease, 1 mg intravenous over 2 minutes

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Fletcher Allen Health Care Emergency Department Burlington Vermont

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Vermont

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (3)

Cullen L, Taylor D, Taylor S, Chu K. Nebulized lidocaine decreases the discomfort of nasogastric tube insertion: a randomized, double-blind trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Aug;44(2):131-7. — View Citation

Juhl GA, Conners GP. Emergency physicians' practices and attitudes regarding procedural anaesthesia for nasogastric tube insertion. Emerg Med J. 2005 Apr;22(4):243-5. — View Citation

Singer AJ, Richman PB, Kowalska A, Thode HC Jr. Comparison of patient and practitioner assessments of pain from commonly performed emergency department procedures. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Jun;33(6):652-8. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Pain score on the visual analog scale reported by patient Degree of pain reported by subject on a visual analog scale and a five point scale Within 30 minutes after completion of procedure
Primary Discomfort score on the visual analog scale reported by patient Degree of discomfort reported by subject on a visual analog scale and a five point scale Within 30 minutes after completion of procedure
Secondary Difficulty of tube placement Difficulty of nasogastric tube insertion as reported by RN on a five point scale Within 30 minutes after completion of procedure
Secondary Complications Number of complications as evaluated by RN, including vomiting, epistaxis or other bleeding, gagging/choking, tracheal misplacement or knotting/kinking/coiling of tube. Within 30 minutes after completion of procedure
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT02922595 - Comparison of iLTS-D® and ILMA® for Intubation With Fiberoptic Control N/A
Completed NCT02051400 - Evaluation of McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope N/A
Completed NCT01965938 - RIFL (Rigid and Flexing Laryngoscope) vs. Fiberoptic Bronchoscope N/A
Completed NCT02769819 - Identification of Morphological Characteristics to Predict Difficult Endotracheal Intubation Using a Flexible Fiberscope N/A
Completed NCT02362568 - Study of Interest on Cervical Ultrasound Exploration for Association With Difficult Intubation N/A
Completed NCT01692522 - Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Ambu Aura-i Versus AirQ in Children N/A
Recruiting NCT03035786 - Airway Code Calls - Survey of Management N/A
Completed NCT02290249 - Intubation of a Pediatric Manikin in Difficult Airway by Novice Personnel: A Comparison of Glidescope and Airtraq Phase 4
Completed NCT02326896 - MACOCHA Score Predicts Intubation Failure N/A
Completed NCT01984970 - McGrath Series 5 Videolaryngoscope for Double-lumen Tube Intubation N/A
Completed NCT01474213 - Sedation Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Remifentanil to Fibreoptic Intubation Phase 4
Terminated NCT00464490 - Use of Dexmedetomidine to Facilitate Extubation in Surgical ICU Patients Who Failed Previous Weaning Attempts N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02430415 - Laryngoscope-assisted Lightwand Intubation and Cervical Spine Motion N/A
Completed NCT01464489 - Intubation Time With Low Dose Rocuronium N/A
Terminated NCT01075789 - Using Lignocaine Spray and Gel to Reduce the Pain Associated With Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Children N/A
Recruiting NCT02501577 - Comparison of Various Supraglottic Airway Devices for Fiberoptical Guided Tracheal Intubation N/A
Completed NCT02566135 - I-gel Versus Classic-Laryngeal Mask Airway (C-LMA) as a Conduit for Tracheal Intubation Using Ventilating Bougie N/A
Recruiting NCT02493478 - Improving Safety and Quality of Tracheal Intubation Practice in Pediatric ICUs
Completed NCT02198742 - A Comparison Between Two Video Laryngoscopes,in Successfully Intubating Pediatric Mannequins w/wo Difficult Airways Phase 1
Completed NCT02788253 - Mallampati Classification vs Best Visible Mallampati for Prediction of Difficult Tracheal Intubation