View clinical trials related to Intubation;Difficult.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to evaluate if intubation with video laryngoscopy (VL) will result in less head motion and therefore less cervical motion when compared with direct laryngoscopy (DL). The aim of the study is to determine the amount of head motion (extension, flexion and rotation) when using Storz C-Mac® video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopes. Secondarily, the study will also measure the number of attempts to properly intubate and the time required for intubation with either technique.
Tracheal intubation requires alignment of oro-pharyngeal-laryngeal axes. When these three axes are not aligned, intubation becomes difficult. In the researchers' study, the investigators simulated difficult laryngoscopy situation by using a rigid neck collar. This neck collar renders intubation difficult not only by restricting neck movement, but also reducing mouth opening. The investigators compared the performance of Macintosh, MacCoy and Airtraq laryngoscope in simulated difficult laryngoscopy using a rigid neck collar.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether using the flexible Trachway(R) intubating stylet could facilitate and promote the accurate placement of double-lumen endobronchial tube.
The purpose of this study is to determine if cervical ultrasound exploration can predict difficult intubation better than main validated clinical criteria.
Previous study showed that McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope is an alternative tool for double-lumen tube intubation. We have compared it with traditional Macintosh laryngoscopefor double-lumen tube intubation. In this study, we will investigate its role in double-lumen tube intubation by comparison with another videolarygoscope.
Risk factors for difficult intubation are well described in anesthesiology. But intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a challenging issue, associated with severe life-threatening complications. Non-anesthesiologist trainees performing ICU intubation may not fully appreciate the potential difficulty and complications. Therefore in this retrospective analysis the MACOCHA score will be used to determine difficult intubation in the ICU and predict intubation failure.
Background and aims: Glidescope and Airtraq were designed to facilitate intubation and to improve teaching intubation. The investigators want to find their efficacy in normal airway, tongue edema and face-to-face orotracheal intubation models by novice personal. Material and Methods: After Kocaeli Human Researches Ethics Committee approval, thirty six medical students who were on the beginning of their third year were enrolled in this study. After watching a video about the intubation of one of these devices, they attempted to intubate an adult manikin in three different airway models in a random order; first in normal airway, second, tongue edema and finally, in an entrapped manikin by face-to-face approach with Glidescope or Airtraq. Intubation attempts, insertion and intubation times, success rates, Cormack-Lehane grades, need of maneuvers of these devices were recorded.
Trauma victims had to be intubated at the scene of area in different conditions. Face-to-face intubation in an entrapped patient is one of these situations. The investigators want to compare the efficacy of Glidescope, Airtraq and Fastrach in simulating face-ro-face intubation in adult patients aged between 18-60 years.
This study was designed to determine the first attempt success rate of tracheal intubation with the McGRATH™ MAC laryngoscope using direct visualization in patients with known difficult airways, as well as exploring the possibility of identifying a particular direct Cormack-Lehane (C-L) grade view where indirect (video) visualization can be most beneficial during laryngoscopy and intubation.
The study is a randomized crossover study where anesthesia practitioners will intubate three different pediatric infant mannequins (normal airway, anterior larynx, Pierre Robin syndrome anatomy) using three different intubation devices (the Miller blade, the Truview VL, the Glidescope Cobalt video-laryngoscope) in two different scenarios (normal neck and with an immobile neck). The order of presentation will be randomized. As this is a cross over study, all subjects will complete all scenarios. There is no placebo group, and each subject wil be his or her own control.