Impact of Covid-19 Aerosol Box On Intubation Success Rate

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The safety of novel medical device must be assessed before being implemented into clinical practice. In the case of aerosol box, one of the safety features concerned includes its impact on intubation and how it affect the probability of efficient intubation in order to avoid risk of hypoxia to patient. As the barrier box is newly invented, there have been limited studies published. This study aims to compare intubation success rate between intubation with and without aerosol box in real patients, which will determine the chances of efficient intubation and reflect the safety features of the aerosol box.

Clinical Trial Description

General Objective To determine whether intubation performed using aerosol box will have a lower chance of success as compared to intubation without using the box. Specific Objectives 1. To determine whether intubation with aerosol box will require more time for successful intubation as compared to intubation without the box. 2. To compare the ease of intubation and determine whether intubation using aerosol box will require additional airway manipulation as compared to intubation without using the box. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT06042829
Study type	Interventional
Source	Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	November 23, 2020
Completion date	November 22, 2021

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05535127` - Sequential Strategy vs Palpation vs Routine Ultrasound for Detection of Cricothyroid Membrane	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05036460` - Real-time Sonography in Detecting Inadvertent Esophageal Intubation Among Difficult Intubation Patients	N/A
Completed	`NCT05303948` - Evaluation of Two Positions for Free Floating Tracheal Intubation in Weightlessness	N/A
Completed	`NCT06107751` - Ramped and Sniffing Position for Cesarean Section Intubation.	N/A
Completed	`NCT04089540` - New Intubation Method to Achieve Circulatory Stability and to Reduce Number of Intubation Attempts in Neonates	N/A
Completed	`NCT05522049` - Videolaryngoscopic Intubation Using Macintosh vs.Hyperangulated Blades in Patients With Expected Difficult Intubation	N/A
Completed	`NCT03046966` - Manikin To Patient Intubation: Does It Translate?	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05130645` - Evaluation of Mandibular Mental Angle and Mandibular Profile Angle
Completed	`NCT06138119` - The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Fiberoptic Intubation Performance	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06115694` - Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy With Rigid Stylet vs Video Laryngoscopy With the TCI Articulating Introducer for Endotracheal Intubation in Simulated Difficult Airways	N/A
Completed	`NCT05243758` - Who is Rapid And Success? The Comparison Of Video Fiberscope And Video Laryngoscope	N/A
Completed	`NCT04833166` - Comparing Full vs. Partial Glottis View Using CMAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope in Simulated Cervical Injury Patient	N/A
Completed	`NCT03118596` - Fibre-optic Guided Tracheal Intubation Through SADs	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05680909` - Evaluation of SaCo Videolaryngeal Mask Airway in Morbidly Obese
Recruiting	`NCT05429112` - Flexible Tip Bougie vs Tube With Stylet for Intubation With a Videolaryngoscopy in ICU (VIDEOL-FLEXTIP)	N/A
Completed	`NCT05833347` - Evaluation of Difficult Laryngoscopy With Ultrasonography in Pediatric Patients
Completed	`NCT05366582` - Neural Integrity Monitor Electromyogram (NIM-EMG) Endotracheal Tube Intubation With Video Laryngoscope	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06322719` - Hyperangulated vs Macintosh Blades for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy in ICU	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06213389` - Comparison of EzVision® Videolaryngoscope and Gum Elastic Bougie-Assisted Machintosh Laryngoscopy	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05884645` - Video Intelligence intubaTION (VITION)