Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02495259
Other study ID # IRB00081067
Secondary ID
Status Terminated
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 2015
Est. completion date July 27, 2017

Study information

Verified date June 2018
Source Emory University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare three different standard of care methods of double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) placement in patients who are scheduled to have thoracic surgery in which lung isolation is required.


Description:

The purpose of this study is to compare three different standard of care methods of double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) placement in patients who are scheduled to have thoracic surgery in which lung isolation is required. The investigators want to evaluate the technique of placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) using an included stylet that has been radically bent (ZU-bend) as compared to a commercial GlideRite stylet with the GlideScope and direct laryngoscopy using the Macintosh laryngoscope. A double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) is a breathing tube utilized to manage the airway when lung separation is needed for a surgical procedure. The investigator wants to evaluate how long it takes for successful placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) and assess the difficulty of the procedure experienced by the physician performing the intubation.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 19
Est. completion date July 27, 2017
Est. primary completion date July 27, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. Male and female patients requiring a double-lumen endobronchial tube placement for surgery at Emory University Hospital or Emory University Hospital Midtown

2. Patients willing and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients in whom a previously difficult airway manipulation was recorded on an anesthetic record

2. Lung transplantation procedures, as underlying pulmonary disorder that will confound the SpO2 (peripheral capillary oxygen saturation) metric

3. Any patient who is receiving anticoagulants in excess of a daily aspirin, patients with an International Normalized Ratio or INR >1

4. Patients in whom one lung ventilation or placement of a double-lumen endobronchial tube is contraindicated

5. Patients who require a rapid-sequence intubation

6. Patients undergoing emergency procedures

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
ZU-bend stylet
Laryngoscopy and intubation after induction of anesthesia will be done using the GlideScope and the ZU-bend stylet. The ZU-bend is a specific shaping technique of the intubating stylet that is closely related to the GlideScope blade curvature. Zu-bend stylet is withdrawn as a part of placement procedure during the DLT advancement. Thereafter, GlideScope is removed and placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube is verified with capnography and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the usual manner.
GlideScope
Laryngoscopy and intubation after induction of anesthesia will be done using the the GlideScope technique. The GlideScope is a video laryngoscope that provides a real-time view of the airway and tube placement during intubation. GlideScope is removed after DLT is in the trachea, and placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube is verified with capnography and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the usual manner.
GlideRite stylet
Laryngoscopy and intubation after induction of anesthesia will be done with the GlideScope using the GlideRite stylet. The GlideRite stylet is specifically designed to work with the GlideScope and provides the necessary rigidity and curvature to an otherwise flexible tube. GlideRite stylet is withdrawn as a part of placement procedure during the DLT advancement. Thereafter, GlideScope is removed and placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube is verified with capnography and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the usual manner.
Macintosh blade
Direct laryngoscopy and intubation after induction of anesthesia will be done with the Macintosh blade and a regular double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) stylet. The Macintosh blade is used to facilitate visualization of the larynx during double or single lumen endobronchial tube placement. After intubation the Macintosh laryngoscope is removed and the confirmation of the successful placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube in done in the standard fashion.
Regular Double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) Stylet
Direct laryngoscopy and intubation after induction of anesthesia will be done with a regular double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) stylet and the Macintosh blade. The DLT stylet is withdrawn as a part of placement procedure during the DLT advancement. Thereafter, Macintosh laryngoscope is removed and placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube is verified with capnography and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the usual manner.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Emory University Hospital Atlanta Georgia
United States Emory University Hospital Midtown Atlanta Georgia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Emory University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Mean Time to Place the Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube The time taken for successful intubation will be recorded by the anesthetist. The total duration from the time the laryngoscope is placed at the patient's lips to the first detection of End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2), an average of 120 seconds, will be recorded in seconds. A higher duration noted is indicative of a longer time taken for successful intubation. 0 seconds (laryngoscope at patient's lips), (first End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) detection) during laryngoscope placement, up to 120 seconds
Secondary Success Rate of First Endobronchial Intubation Attempt The rate of first intubation attempt success will be recorded by the anesthetist. A successful first attempt intubation is when the double-lumen endobronchial tube is placed during the initial laryngoscopy within 120 seconds. The average time for successful intubation is 120 seconds, which is the time from when the laryngoscope is placed at the patient's lips to the first detection of End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2). Higher numbers of successful first attempt intubations indicate better rates of success of first endobronchial intubation attempts . during laryngoscope placement, up to 120 seconds
Secondary Assessment of Difficulty of Intubation The ease of successful placement of the double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) will be assessed by the anesthetist's responses to a multi-question form which includes the following items that are scored; overall ease of intubation, laryngoscope insertion, glottic view, double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) delivery and placement. The subjective scores range from 0-10; where 0=worst, 10=best. The average time for successful intubation is 120 seconds, which is the time from when the laryngoscope is placed at the patient's lips to the first detection of End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2). during laryngoscope placement, up to 120 seconds
Secondary Number of Cases With Complications Number of cases with complications during intubation will be will be assessed by the anesthetist's responses to a multi-question form which includes the following items; blood on device, SpO2 (peripheral capillary oxygen saturation) <96%, lip and dental trauma and double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) cuff rupture. The responses are recorded as Yes or No for each item. A 'yes' response indicates a complication. The average time for successful intubation is 120 seconds, which is the time from when the laryngoscope is placed at the patient's lips to the first detection of End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2). during laryngoscope placement, up to 120 seconds
Secondary Number of Cases of Voice Change Any voice change in the patient after extubation will be assessed in the Post-Operative Admission Unit (PACU) by asking the patient if any change in voice is experienced (Yes/No). The subjective answer given by the patient will be recorded. The average time for the patient to sufficiently recover to respond is expected to be 60 minutes after extubation. Up to 60 minutes after extubation
Secondary Throat Pain Any voice change in the patient after extubation will be assessed in the Post-Operative Admission Unit (PACU) by recording the patient's response to the degree of pain experienced. An analog pain scale will be used for scoring where: 0= no pain and 10= severe pain. The average time for the patient to sufficiently recover to respond is expected to be 60 minutes after extubation. Up to 60 minutes after extubation
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT05717907 - Suction Catheter as a Guide for Nasotracheal Intubation Under General Anesthesia N/A
Completed NCT03653910 - Effect-site Concentration of Remifentanil for Double-lumen Tubes Intubation: Airtraq VS Macintosh Laryngoscope N/A
Recruiting NCT04190524 - Sonographic Assessment of Cricoid Pressure N/A
Completed NCT02359370 - The Effects of Lidocaine and Magnesium Sulphate on the Attenuation of the Hemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT05036460 - Real-time Sonography in Detecting Inadvertent Esophageal Intubation Among Difficult Intubation Patients N/A
Completed NCT05502120 - A Comparison of Vie-Scope and Macintosh Blade Laryngoscopes in Morbidly Obese. N/A
Completed NCT03992950 - Effectiveness of Cricoid and Paratracheal Pressures for Occluding Esophagus N/A
Completed NCT05303948 - Evaluation of Two Positions for Free Floating Tracheal Intubation in Weightlessness N/A
Completed NCT03720093 - Exploratory Analysis of Pulmonary Microbiome in Intubated Patients
Recruiting NCT03031808 - Comparison of Two Induction Regimens Using Topical Lidocaine or Muscle Relaxant on Sore Throat and Hemodynamics Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT02918526 - Hemodynamic Study With PRAM of the Cardiovascular Response to the Positioning of the Extraglottic Device N/A
Completed NCT02364622 - The Effects of Flexible Intubating Stylet in the Accurate Placement of Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube N/A
Completed NCT05249738 - Tongue Edema Caused by Intubation Tube in Intensive Care Unit Patients
Completed NCT03842306 - End-tidal Oxygen Can Reliably Predict the Arterial Partial Pressure of Oxygen Among Emergency Department Patients
Terminated NCT03340207 - Novel Airway Device to Aid Endotracheal Intubations N/A
Recruiting NCT05782517 - I-gel vs. Endotracheal Intubation for Laparoscopic Gynaecological Procedures N/A
Recruiting NCT06085326 - Smart Checklist Implementation for Pediatric Tracheal Intubations in the ICU- Multicenter Study N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06108271 - Innovative Endotracheal Tube Design Reduces Postoperative Laryngeal Injury N/A
Completed NCT05668299 - Determining the Appropriate Setting of an Automated Secretion Removal Technology (TrachFlush) N/A
Completed NCT04079387 - Effect of Endotracheal Tube Plus STYLET Versus Endotracheal Tube Alone N/A