View clinical trials related to Intravenous Access.
Filter by:The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the functionality of the IV SafeLock in the clinical emergency department setting.
The purpose of this study is to determine if use of the SU-VEID™ in children facilitates an increase success rate of peripheral intravenous starts, in comparison to the conventional method of vein entry techniques.
This study will determine the efficacy of POCUS (Point of Care UltraSound) for intravenous (IV) access during pediatric interfacility transport. The Butterfly iQ+ (Lightning) device will be used. Children requiring IV access for transport will be randomized to POCUS-Assisted IV placement or traditional IV placement. We will examine and compare first attempt success rates with each method.
In pediatric patients with no vascular access, anesthesia induction is usually achieved with sevoflurane. The aim of investigators to evaluate the optimum intravenous access time and the corresponding bispectral index (BIS) value in pediatric surgery under sevoflurane anesthesia.
Overall survival of patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (*OHCA*) is less than 10% worldwide and in Taiwan. Interventions provided by the emergency medical system (*EMS*) before arrival at the hospital are of paramount importance to patient outcomes after OHCA. Among those interventions, the pros-and-cons of different vascular accesses, including intraosseous (*IO*) access or intravenous (*IV*) access, remained the issue of most under debate. The objective of this study is to determine the comparative effectiveness of IO access vs IV access in patients with OHCA by a randomized controlled trial (*RCT*) in Taipei EMS. To name in short, the investigators called it a "*VICTOR* trial" standing for "Venous Injection Compared To intraOsseous injection during Resuscitation of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest".
To establish the IV access strategy for terminally ill cancer patients, using comparisons of the safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction between the initially routine PICC insertion group (routine PICC group) and general IV access group (optional PICC group).
The investigators wish to determine whether passive leg raise allows for easier peripheral vascular access in the pediatric population. The investigators hypothesize that pediatric anesthesiologists will have higher rates of successful intravenous catheterization in children where a passive leg raise is employed.
While peripheral venous cannulation is among the most common procedures performed in clinical settings, it is estimated that PIV insertion fails for 6 million patients annually. Failure to establish peripheral venous access in the emergency department is a costly problem, leading to delays in diagnostics and treatment and requiring alternative sites for vascular access. These alternative methods can lead to higher complications rates, decreased patient satisfaction, and increased utilization of nursing and physician time. Complications from PIV failure also pose a significant financial burden to the healthcare system. Ultrasound guidance has been shown to greatly improve the process of localizing vessels for cannulation. In a healthcare climate that is increasingly focused on outcomes and cost-effectiveness, ultrasound-guided peripheral venous cannulation has become not only a viable but often the preferred method in patients with difficult venous access. Nevertheless, studies to date on ultrasound-guided peripheral venous cannulation have revealed some shortcomings, such as premature failure and low first attempt success rates. The purpose of our study is to assess whether ultrasound-guided cannulation of a AccuCath catheter, which has a coiled tip guidewire, is superior to ultrasound-guided cannulation of a conventional peripheral IV catheter across clinical outcomes relevant to the emergency department setting.